Switzerland's controversial invention designed to facilitate assisted suicide, the "Sarco" pod, has been blocked by prosecutors in the country just weeks before its planned rollout in euthanasia clinics.
This decision throws a wrench into the plans of Dr. Philip Nitschke, a vocal advocate for assisted dying, who designed the device as a more streamlined and supposedly painless method for ending one's life.
It's important to note that active euthanasia is illegal in Switzerland, but assisted dying is legal.
The Sarco: A Futuristic Euthanasia Device
(Photo : Exit International)
Dubbed the "Tesla of Euthanasia," the suicide capsule has been a hot topic in Switzerland. Now, prosecutors decided to finally ban it before it can be used this month.
The Sarco, named after the ancient Egyptian burial containers (sarcophagi), resembles a futuristic capsule. It appears to be taken out of a sci-fi book as if a person is just sleeping inside a space capsule.
According to Exit International, the euthanasia advocacy group behind it, the user enters and triggers a mechanism that floods the chamber with nitrogen, rapidly reducing oxygen levels.
This supposedly renders the person unconscious before death. Dr. Nitschke has touted the Sarco as a quick and painless method for individuals seeking assisted suicide.
Related Article: 104-Year-Old Australian Scientist Commits Assisted Suicide In Switzerland
Legal Hurdles Surrounding Suicide Pods
Prosecutors in Schaffhausen Canton, Switzerland, however, raised legal and ethical concerns about the Sarco, according to Blick, a local news outlet. They cited the ambiguity surrounding the device's operation and the potential difficulty in establishing who is ultimately responsible for the death that occurs within it.
This uncertainty violates a section of the canton's penal code. Additionally, concerns arose regarding the potential for coercion or manipulation of vulnerable individuals seeking assisted suicide.
Pro-Life Groups Criticize the Sarco's Aesthetics
Beyond legal concerns, pro-life organizations condemned the Sarco for its sleek and futuristic design. They believe such a design could trivialize or even glamorize suicide, potentially encouraging individuals to choose this path without fully exploring other options.
James Mildred, director of engagement at CARE, said that many have been condemning Nitschke's device for assisted suicide.
'We believe that suicide is a tragedy that good societies seek to prevent in every circumstance. There are ethical ways to help human beings that don't involve the destruction of life," Mildred said.
Uncertain Future for the Sarco
The ban on the Sarco's use in Switzerland comes despite claims from its creators that it had passed legal review. The legality of assisted suicide itself is not in question, as Switzerland has established laws permitting it under specific conditions. However, the Sarco seems to fall into a legal gray area due to its unique design and operational specifics.
Dr. Nitschke has not yet commented on the ban, and the future of the Sarco remains unclear. The controversy is expected to continue with ongoing debate surrounding this topic. Truly, ethical considerations should be heard that pro-life individuals want to convey to the public.
