2,243 words
Part 2 of 2 (Part 1 here)
The Gospel of Christ
The Roman Army, led by Pompey, conquered Syria and the Levant in 63 BC. Less than three decades later, Julius Caesar conquered Egypt. The Romans indirectly ruled Judea through a client king, Herod the Great, an Idumean. As in Idumean, he was not racially Jewish and only nominally practiced the Jewish pseudo-religion.
Herod the Great was a Hellenist who wanted to increase the use of the Greek language and the standing of Greek culture in the region. But he had to buy off the local ethnonationalist Jews, so he rebuilt Zerubbabel’s Temple with the enormous funds coming into the region through the Jews’ predatory moneylending. Herod claimed he found gold for his temple and other projects, such as the construction of the fortress at Masada, by raiding the gold hidden in “King David’s tomb.”
For their part, the organized Jewish community, who were well-governed by King Herod and secured by Rome’s legions, had the chance to plunder the Roman Empire by currying favor with Roman officials through bribes. When Caesar Augustus took the purple, the Jews had the chance to make slaves of the whole civilized world. Delaney writes:
Then Jesus arose and tore away their masks, exposing the Jews as liars, deceivers, hypocrites, murderers, and the very children of the devil that they truly are. And, proving that his accusations were entirely true, the Monsters of Babylon murdered him. (Vol. 2, p. 129)
The Gospels tell the story of Jesus’ life and ministry through four different voices. The first three contain mostly the same stories in mostly the same order. They are called the Synoptic Gospels and were written between 40 and 70 AD. The last one, John, was written later, perhaps even after the Book of Revelation, which I believe was written around 65 AD. Delaney believes that Revelation was not written until 95, and that it was written by someone other than the Apostle John, the son of Zebedee. Delaney’s view makes Revelation difficult to understand, and he correctly points out that Revelation’s unclear message is easily used by con artists to deceive Christians. However, given the view that the book was written earlier, Revelation becomes a clear account of Nero’s persecutions and the Siege of Jerusalem in 70 AD.
Delaney believes that Mary was impregnated after a heavy petting session with Joseph that was short of penetration. Some semen was able to enter Mary’s womb and she conceived. Mary’s pregnancy was therefore a surprise, and a gynecological exam would have proved her to be intact.
Jesus thus fulfilled the primary prophetic criteria to be the Messiah — virgin birth — and he grew up in a religious household in a religious extended family. John the Baptist was the same age and was Jesus’ cousin of Jesus, while his father was a priest. Jesus also had siblings who joined the movement he founded. His family lived in a heavily Greek-influenced part of Palestine. Christ’s family were builders and were not involved in moneylending.
Jesus was thus convinced of his mission from early childhood, and he worked as hard as he could at understanding the Old Testament, which I believe was the Greek Septuagint. He came to understand its universalist messages as those parts of the text which were of primary importance rather than the dishonest behavior of those such as Jacob and his uncle. Christ’s message of forgiveness and his rejection of the in-group/out-group morality of the Jews put him on a collusion course with the organized Jewish community, who eventually conspired to have the Romans kill him.
Delaney interprets most Christ’s miracles from a scientific point of view, but he believes that the healings, exorcisms, walking on water, transfiguration, and his appearances after the resurrection were due to Jesus’s mastery of his Qi (vital force.)
Delaney makes the same mistake that Revilo P. Oliver made when he argues that the Apostle Paul shaped Christ’s movement in order to benefit Jews. In fact, Paul might have been the figure who ended any budding Judaizing forces in the early Christian movement. The figure who Judaized Christianity is John Nelson Darby, inventor of the Dispensationalist theological school of thought in the 1830s. Darby’s theology was a dominant force in Anglo-Christianity until very recently.
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/counter-currents.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/St_Paul_Stoned.jpg)
The Apostle Paul was nearly stoned to death by a Jewish-organized mob in Lystra. The event is described in Acts 14:19-20.
Delaney’s criticism of the Apostle Paul does have merit when he points out that one should not take the word of a racial Jew at face value, however. The stories of Anne Frank and Elie Wiesel are lies. So of course, are the lies about “October 7.”
Delaney examines the other letters in the New Testament and tells the story of the lives of each of Christ’s Twelve Disciples. Although they were faced with hardships due to their views, none reverted to the pseudo-religion of Judaism even when faced with torture and death.
The best of Christ’s teachings is to forgive one’s neighbor. Carrying a grudge over small insults, real or imagined, can harm one’s personal and professional life. Nonetheless, Delaney is correct when he writes, “Being mild in rebuking your neighbors or your brothers is not the same as allowing demons and devils to attack and destroy your family or your country” (p. 146).
Christ’s movement as a form of Greek ethnonationalist defense?
Delaney sees Christ’s ministry from a New Age point of view. An examination of Christianity’s conception and growth should also be looked at from an ethnonationalist point of view. The lingua franca of the Eastern Roman Empire was Greek, which was populated by Greeks and related peoples. The Greeks were similar to Anglo-Saxons in that they could easily assimilate related peoples and had the ability to build an empire.
The people who were most similar to the Greeks in the Eastern Mediterranean were the Indo-European Philistines, the descendants of the Hittites, such as the Lycaonians, as well as Armenians and others. Greek settlers also colonized parts of Syria, Sicily, Italy, North Africa, and the coast of the Black Sea.
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/counter-currents.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Greek_East_Roman_Empire.png)
The Roman Empire consisted of two linguistic zones. In the west, Latin was the favored language, while Greek was used in the east. The Greeks were an important part of the Roman Empire, but they were wedged between tyrannical “globalist” Roman overlords and wealthy Jewish moneylenders who had enough money to buy any official. Source: Pressbooks
The wider Greek world was under the control of the Romans. By the first century, the Roman Empire was an autocracy where every official could be bribed. The Greeks were a cultured, industrious, but politically dispossessed people caught between the pincers of a tyrannical government whose leader was considered a god and a wealthy, vicious, and coddled Jewish minority that was highly skilled in financial swindling, slave trading, and manipulating the government.
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/counter-currents.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/SolereResistanceFrontMedium-207x300.jpg)
You can buy Fenek Solère’s Resistance here.
Christ’s command to “render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s” is a moral rejection of allowing the government to serve in the role of the divine. Rousas J. Rushdoony was right when he said, “Western Liberty began when the claim of the state to be man’s savior was denied.”[1] The Greeks could use Christ’s message to free themselves from the tyranny of Caesar.
Delaney is hostile to the author of Hebrews, who he believes is Paul. I consider this hostility to be unwarranted, as it misses the point, which is easily seen if one considers Christianity as a form of metapolitical ethnic defense employed by the Greeks and related peoples. The author of Hebrews compares Christ to the High Priest Melchizedek, who was a Canaanite. This comparison shows that Christ’s message was based on the universal truths of the Egyptian, Canaanite, and Akkadian religious thinkers rather than the swindling ideas of the Pharisees and ethnonationalist Jews. Christ’s message therefore also liberates the Greeks from the tyranny of the Jews.
That the Latin peoples in the Western Empire took to Christ’s teachings shows that they were subject to the same forces, if to a lesser degree. The Jews didn’t bedevil Iberia or Britain until later. The Roman government was also more “their” government in that most of the emperors were ethnically Latin.
After Christ
Unfortunately, the only surviving account of the Roman-Jewish War of 66-70 AD comes from a Jew. Nonetheless, the Greek and Roman point of view on it is easy enough to reconstruct The Greeks built Caesarea and Jews were permitted to live there. The Jews behaved obnoxiously, and eventually the local Greeks pushed back. One humorist mocked their religious practices with an animal sacrifice which led to rioting. The rioting eventually became a major war.
Greeks were attacked by Jews across Palestine, but they successfully appealed to Rome for aid. The Greeks in Syria used the conflict to rid their towns of Jews and appealed, ultimately unsuccessfully, to have the special rights granted to the Jews repealed by the Emperor. The Temple of Jerusalem was then destroyed by the Romans. While besieged in Jerusalem, the Jews carried out an internal political revolution the violence of which was remarkably similar to the Bolshevik killings in Russia. Every Jewish political scheme ends in blood and tears.
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/counter-currents.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Christians_Leaving.jpg)
Simon, the “brother” of Jesus leading the Christians out of Jerusalem during the First Roman-Jewish War. There was not a “Judeo-Christian” army resisting the Romans. All “Roman” oppression of Christians at this time was instigated by Jews.
The second Jewish revolt of 115–117 was a far more serious crisis for the Romans. Delaney believes that the Jews were encouraged to revolt because the Roman army was positioned to capture Babylon, which was then held by the Parthian (Persian) Empire. Babylon was the financial center of international Jewry, and its Jews didn’t want to be placed under Roman law. Jewish messengers were sent from Mesopotamia to the Jews in the Roman Empire to instruct them to rise up with them simultaneously. The Jews thus revolted in Egypt, Cyrene (near Tripoli), and Cyprus. Thousands of Greeks were killed. Roman historian Dio Casius writes:
Then the Jews in Cyrene (Tripoli) choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and the Greeks, and devoured their bodies, drank the blood, closed themselves in the flayed skins, and sawed many in half from the head downwards; some they threw to the wild beasts and others were compelled to fight in single combat; so that in all, 220,000 were killed. In Egypt they did many similar things, also in Cypress, led by one of them named Artemion, and there another 240,000 were slain. (Vol. 2, p. 281)
The Romans were forced to redeploy troops from the main theater in Babylon in order to put down the rising. Rome started to build defensive border walls and fortresses after this rebellion, and the Roman Empire stopped expanding due to this Jewish stab in the back.
The next Jewish attack on Rome was called the Bar Kokhba revolt of 132-136. The Jewish army didn’t hold any cities; rather, the rebels fought a protracted guerrilla war that was eventually defeated by a large Roman force. Skeletons of the Jewish rebels are still found in caves across the region.
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/counter-currents.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/AntiFeminist-2-200x300.jpg)
You can buy Anthony M. Ludovici’s Confessions of an Anti-Feminist here.
Despite so much Jewish treachery, the Roman government continued to coddle Jews. No emperor ended the special rights granted to Jews that effectively protected them via a two-tiered justice system. Jews continued to gather money through their illicit schemes and were heavily involved in the slave trade. These slaves mostly came from Slavic or Germanic peoples. Likewise, the “Roman” persecution of the Christians at this time was in fact a Jewish-instigated affair.
During the Roman-Persian War of 602-628, the Jews in Palestine took advantage of the Persian victory to massacre the Greeks and Christians living in rebuilt Roman Jerusalem and the surrounding region. The Jews purchased the captured Christian Greeks as slaves from the Persians in order to cut the Christians’ throats. Archaeologists have discovered mass graves from this time, and the skeletons show that the victims were women, children, and old men. The second volume ends it narrative in 1000 AD, with the Jews holding Spain. The Jews collaborated with the Islamic Moors against the Spanish before and during the occupation of Iberia.
Modern lessons
The savagery shown by the Jews toward the Greeks is very similar to the savagery of the Jews in the terror militias of the Zionist Entity today. Additionally, the organized Jewish community has the government of the American Empire of Nothing completely under its thumb. Regardless, there are some things that American white advocates can do.
Jewish power relies on money and lies. Knowing that fact is a major step in reducing Jewish power in America and Europe. White Americans should seek to keep their finances in order and not do business with Jews. If one is in a position to hire or fire, don’t hire Jews. Whites also need to be prepared to defend themselves. The Greeks who were massacred by the Jews in the Eastern Roman Empire thought they were safely secured by Roman law and legions and failed to recognize the danger.
Consider the peaceful pro-Palestine protestors who are being attacked by ethnonationalist Jews today. The Jews recognize that their “golden age” in America is ending, but it doesn’t mean that Jews are “under threat.” The opposite is true: The Jews are the threat.
Note
[1] Rousas J. Rushdoony, The Foundations of Social Order (Vallecito, Calif.: Ross House Books, 1968), p. 67.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
4 comments
Thank you for your detailed review and for bringing this book and the long history of Jewish perfidy it chronicles to our attention. Where can I order it? It does not seem to be in the Clemens & Blair catalog.
Also, did Dara Halley-James ever publish the book you linked to in the article?
One can buy the book on Amazon.com.
Did Dara Halley-James ever publish the book linked to in the article?
I don’t know.
No, we lost touch. She was a very security conscious writer. If she is out there still, I would love to hear from her.
All told, this is a good balance of reverence and the scholarly approach, which I don’t see together very often. The things they don’t discuss in Sunday school!
Other than that, there’s a lot they don’t talk about in history classes either. Even in more advanced presentations, I don’t often see the straight dope discussed plainly and concisely. For instance, I’d heard about a big dust-up in Alexandria back then, but it wasn’t clear what it was all about. I had no idea that this was part of a coordinated series of massacres to protect their foreign business interests while the Romans were at war in Mesopotamia. (I suppose that’s much in the same way that one hears about late 19th century pogroms in Russia, but it’s seldom explained that things got that way because the usual sort of berserk radicalinskis whacked Czar Alexander II.) Given how the Romans handled the Spartacus revolt, the Carthaginians, and the Gallic wars, I’m surprised that they didn’t expel all the empire’s Jews eastward, or worse. Treasonable shenanigans don’t win hearts and minds – maybe they should just stop doing that.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.