User talk:PailSimon: Difference between revisions

Hello, PailSimon! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Devokewater (talk) 11:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 12:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you felt the need to post this. PailSimon (talk) 13:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's an informational notice, posted because you've edited pages related to that subject. You might think of it as a sort of speed limit sign. It's to let you know that this is an area of Wikipedia with more stringent rules about editing behaviour. Welcome to Wikipedia, and happy editing! BlackcurrantTea (talk) 01:18, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop injecting wholly irrelevant items into unrelated pages. Every opinion a journalist has expressed does not warrant a section on their Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sniper247 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop editing your own wiki page, Anne.PailSimon (talk) 21:39, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not Anne Applebaum, please stop trying to vandalize her page.Sniper247 (talk) 18:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're really fooling nobody here.PailSimon (talk) 19:02, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Anne Applebaum. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 01:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there

I have again reverted your edits to the Salvador Dali page. See MOS:POPCULT I take you point that the article already contains two references to the portrayal of Salvador Dali in films. However, recent portrayals of an artist in major films, where the artist is a major character, is arguably more relevant and worthy of note than a "mention" in a 50 year old pop song. I realize that it's difficult to draw a line, but we need to avoid articles on famous figures becoming magnets for disjointed trivia. If you would like to develop an article on the representation of Salvador Dali in popular culture that is comprehensive that would be more productive than adding disjointed bits of trivia to an existing article. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 23:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	Cathedral Builder
	Hi PailSimon. I've noticed how you fix up lots of little things - even on contested articles. And they come out the better for it. I dip my lid. The Little Platoon (talk) 20:50, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Horse Eye's Back. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Zhao Lijian‎, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that I was soliciting feedback about how to refer to Brereton's findings at Talk:Brereton_Report#Allegation_vs._conclusion. Your comments would be welcome. TheFeds 12:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zhao Lijian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patient zero. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

=

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:2021 storming of the United States Capitol. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. As an admin, it is my job to maintain decorum and to ensure that edits are according to guidelines. The editor equated mostly peaceful BLM protesters with "riotous mobs": that is unacceptable. Drmies (talk) 01:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you do that again I will block you. Drmies (talk) 01:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{ping|User:Drmies]] You're an involved admin, you're not allowed.PailSimon (talk) 01:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 02:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]