2015-06-03 UTC
# 00:00 kylewm KevinMarks: fixed the Woodwind crash, sorry about that
# 00:04 bret did you ever set up a way for the bearer token to get back to the CLI?
# 00:05 kylewm yes, it temporarily runs a localhost server, gives you a link to click and then when indieauth redirects back to localhost, it gets the auth code and shuts down the server
# 00:10 bret can you register a uri handler? e.g. micropub://?bearer=xxx without having to launch a local host server i wonder?
benwerd joined the channel
# 00:13 kylewm I think I might have looked at aaronpk's pushups app to see the protocol handler thing
bengo joined the channel
Unifex and snarfed joined the channel
KartikPrabhu, endi, FergusL and snarfed joined the channel
frzn joined the channel
bengo, snarfed, nloadholtes, Zegnat, mlncn, JasonO, benwerd, KartikPrabhu, Mark87_, rbrt, frzn, awolf, tantek and lukebrooker joined the channel
friedcell and KevinMarks_ joined the channel
evalica, bengo and KevinMarks__ joined the channel
# 05:34 KevinMarks__ I think Hugh captures the feeling that Facebook is too Public for most people whereas the web feels smaller and more intimate again
# 05:42 benwerd tantek: my server was having a "moment" yesterday. Should be okay now.
# 05:44 tantek cool. I still suspect a problem with my code - but that inconsitency really confused me! :)
bengo joined the channel
# 05:45 benwerd Everything on that server runs behind Squid, and it's really picky about what it thinks might be security issues; had a very similar problem with OwnYourGram a while back.
bengo, snarfed, cweiske, KevinMarks_, lukebrooker and jciv joined the channel
# 06:29 snarfed.org created /offline (+898) "Created page with "{{stub}}
'''<dfn>offline</dfn>''' is anytime you're not online and connected to the internet. It's similar to intermittent connectivity, like using a network with high latency ..."" (
view diff )
snarfed, pfefferle and Jihaisse joined the channel
gRegorLove joined the channel
eschnou and scoates_ joined the channel
fkooman, arlen, interactivist, petermolnar, KevinMarks__, KevinMarks_, benborges, j12t and pfefferle joined the channel
adactio, evalica, KevinMarks_, elima, e-lima, stream7, tvn, j12t, frzn, pfefferle and LanceyWork joined the channel
# 11:08 acegiak anyone able to help me work out why mobile users keep getting an untrusted warning for https on acegiak.net?
# 11:11 cweiske I can guess that they still do it today, and even with https
# 11:12 cweiske acegiak, there are non-https resources on your site
# 11:15 petermolnar since he didn't specify mobile users in case it's old (ie 2.3 android) this could be an issue
pfefferle joined the channel
# 11:30 GWG acegiak: I've been meaning to ask you, are you keeping up with mf2_s?
# 11:48 petermolnar does anyone know how to renew a startssl certificate before the previous runs out without needing to pay for revoking the previous?
# 11:51 GWG THey usually send a notice to renew
# 11:51 GWG I'm sure I did it, but can't recall.
# 11:53 petermolnar I'll just bypass it with an ssl.com cert for a while and get a new from startssl when that runs out
KartikPrabhu and pfefferle joined the channel
# 12:12 acegiak petermolnar: it's a nexus 5 I'm seeing the issue on at the moment but I've seen it on others so If the thing you're referring to is only on older android that's not the problem
# 12:12 acegiak cweiske: I'll have a look at what I can do about that
# 12:13 acegiak GWG: I've been updating to the MF2_s updates you push to wordpress.org
# 12:13 acegiak GWG: nothing has broken my child theme yet which is great
# 12:16 GWG acegiak: I don't have it on WordPress.org,just Github
jansauer joined the channel
# 12:27 acegiak I thought I'd gotten updates for it through wordpress a couple of times
Zegnat and Sebastien-L joined the channel
csarven joined the channel
# 13:00 GWG acegiak: Planning to do some rewriting on my vacation
mlncn, fkooman, tmro and adactio_ joined the channel
# 13:37 GWG I want to improve my microformats structure on my site
wolftune joined the channel
# 13:42 GWG I may need some help once I get into it.
pfefferle, fourtonfish, adactio, loic_m, shiflett and snarfed joined the channel
# 14:13 kylewm petermolnar: I was able to renew my startssl certificate just recently, had to wait until the old cert was within 4 weeks of expiring
# 14:15 Zegnat It is the one reason I am still considering what CA to go with, I am not sure I like StartSSL’s limit on revocations and reissues
# 14:16 petermolnar I walked over to ssl.com this time, the startssl ux pisses me off every single time
eschnou joined the channel
# 14:20 Zegnat I was considering namecheap, they seem to have a Comodo cert for < 10 USD. What is the consensus on them as SSL provider?
adactio joined the channel
# 14:21 cweiske until then, cacert.org suffices for me and my users
# 14:22 Zegnat I looked at CAcert for a second but I want to go SSL only and the fact they aren’t shipped anywhere didn’t sound so good
# 14:22 cweiske yes, but there are no alternatives currently in my eyes
# 14:23 petermolnar but I've been on https for years now, I do need a "fully" valid one :(
cmhobbs joined the channel
adactio, chalettu and pfefferle joined the channel
# 15:03 acegiak Uhhh. I'm guessing my /etc/SSL/certs shouldn't contain like 50 .pem files and that has something to do with last week's intrusion?
# 15:04 petermolnar acegiak key-only ssh, fail2ban and regex patterns mailing you in case syslog gets nasty
cmhobbs joined the channel
# 15:05 acegiak Every time I clean up the server gets hammered until it breaks again
# 15:07 acegiak Linux. My plan for the last few months has been to wait until my internet is connected here and then when I move the server here do the wipe and reinstall game again
# 15:08 petermolnar what security plugins are you using for your wordpress or what other stuff is in place?
# 15:08 acegiak At the moment its hosted on my parents fibre connection
# 15:09 aaronpk acegiak: would you consider just using something like Dreampress?
# 15:09 aaronpk i haven't actually used it before but i keep getting emails from them
# 15:10 aaronpk and i'm curious what people who are more familiar with wordpress think of it
mlncn and interactivist joined the channel
# 15:11 acegiak Ah. I host my own because whisper follow is a massive resource hog
# 15:11 petermolnar aaronpk dreampress looks much like manages containers, but it looks ok
# 15:12 petermolnar why whisperfollow? an rss aggregator would be much more effective
# 15:13 acegiak WhisperFollow does RSS aggregate with magpie as well as mf2
# 15:13 acegiak But yeah its a testament to my awful software building skills
# 15:14 petermolnar in that case stick to it; I thought it's rss only, but if not, I don't have better ideas
# 15:15 acegiak Like, the biggest problem I have with it is that I do the reddit thing of "finished reading my feed. Guess I'll close that tab and open a tab to check my feed"
j12t joined the channel
# 15:15 acegiak Tempted to switch to known and rebuild the experience though
# 15:16 petermolnar althought with that simplicity - for now - you'll get some restrictions
# 15:17 acegiak And less prone to nonsensical explosions and security holes
# 15:17 acegiak Yeah I think wordpress's flexibility will keep me on it
# 15:18 petermolnar but with not too problematic combination of iptables, syslog, nginx rules & fail2ban, you're pretty good to go
# 15:19 acegiak I'll probably seek your wisdom once I do this cleanup when we get fibre here
# 15:20 acegiak We were promised fibre in three months when we moved in in march last year
# 15:21 acegiak Actual street works started two weeks ago. A neighbour has been graciously lending her WiFi to us the whole time
# 15:35 kylewm LanceyWork: upload an image, then click the preview, and the markup should be added to the content textarea.
# 15:36 LanceyWork the markup doesn't do anything, the html content doesn't include it
tvn joined the channel
# 15:37 bret i want to open up my gust wifi, but the tools for monitoring what kind of activity are going through it are nonexistant
# 15:37 kylewm LanceyWork: oh but you are probably saving as a draft? that might not work... :/
wrk3 joined the channel
# 15:38 aaronpk bret: there are some really good tools actually! I used to run them in my dorm room
# 15:38 kylewm LanceyWork: good catch, mind filing an issue?
# 15:38 bret any articles or project you know of, IM all ears!
# 15:39 aaronpk oh man i can't remember what it was called, but it showed you all sorts of information
# 15:42 LanceyWork kylewm, publishing doesn't work either. it uploads the note but doesn't insert the markdown. maybe something i'm doing wrong
snarfed, wolftune and pfefferle joined the channel
# 15:57 LanceyWork i reverted to an earlier version and it's still not working, even with publishing
tantek joined the channel
tilgovi, KevinMarks__, snarfed, wolftune, newbie|2 and j12t joined the channel
# 16:23 tantek that's great LanceyWork! I OTOH have not yet figure out automatic sending of webmentions.
# 16:24 LanceyWork oh yeah i was having trouble getting redwind to include images properly
KevinMarks_ and danlyke joined the channel
# 16:38 tantek been trying to preview edited stuff on the wiki for many minutes now and getting timeouts
# 16:39 tantek "Secure Connection Failed \ The connection to indiewebcamp.com was interrupted while the page was loading. \ The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified. "
# 16:39 tantek I'm really starting to anecdotally believe that SSL everywhere is making the web more fragile
# 16:39 tantek from stuff like that on our wiki, to long periods of FB not loading for the same reason
# 16:40 tantek some kind of SSL thing gets screwed up en route, and everything breaks
# 16:40 tantek it's like another form of XML fragility stupidity
ALomax joined the channel
# 16:41 aaronpk isn't http 2 supposed to fix that or something? :P
# 16:41 tantek some sort of sustained MiTM attempted attack?
# 16:46 bear ignores the straw man comparison to xml "fragility"
# 16:46 bear tantek - most likely it was something in your path to the server trying to inject js or otherwise mess with the data
# 16:47 bear very common in open wifi environments or with vendors like comcast or other isps
# 16:47 bear your connection changed routes, their mitm to insert js broke and you got that error
# 16:48 tantek bear this is with a direct ISP connection - not some open wifi
# 16:49 bear ok - I was just listing some of the more common reasons why i've seen that error happen
endi and interactivist joined the channel
# 16:56 tantek hmm - going to try turning the modem/router off and back on again (with like a 30 seconds downtime just to hopefully get any attackers to give up at least for a bit) to see if it makes any difference
gRegorLove, wolftune, bengo and snarfed joined the channel
benwerd and tantek joined the channel
# 17:28 tantek.com edited /XMPP (-67) "Undo revision 19728 by Wwelves.org perpetual-tripper because looks like wiki noise: "Social Platforms" is meaningless, movim page says nothing about XMPP other than having a chatroom, buddycloud page says nothing about XMPP" (
view diff )
# 17:29 bear tantek - buddycloud is all about XMPP as is movim - why remove them from the XMPP page?
# 17:29 tantek because buddycloud home page is ZERO about XMPP
# 17:30 bear yea, the movim not saying "hey we used XMPP" is a sort point with us xmpp types
bengo joined the channel
# 17:32 tantek it looked like a nonsensical edit from review of the links
# 17:32 tantek also "Social Platforms" is totally meaningless
# 17:32 tantek also - relevance of those sites? are they silos, open source, what?
# 17:32 bear I see your point about buddycloud not explicitely saying "hey we use XMPP" but that doesn't change the fact that it's core *is* XMPP
# 17:32 tantek presumably there's a list somewhere else of XMPP implementations that we could link to?
# 17:33 tantek (since they're not "web" per se - no permalinks)
# 17:33 tantek now if someone here has a deployment of one of these on their own site - they we should create a page for that project and put an "IndieWeb Examples" section on it
# 17:34 bear hmm, i'll take that task on - I know the web site folks at the XSF are redoing the web site for that purpose
# 17:34 tantek if no one here is using any of them, we could document that too - that no one here cares
# 17:34 tantek but do they want that? no reason to try to document everything no one here cares about
# 17:34 tantek (except if something is hyped, and we want to deflate the hype a bit)
# 17:35 bear I just don't like the out-of-hand dismissal of xmpp as not being indieweb when it's the only messaging platform that is completely open source and not a silo
# 17:35 aaronpk well it's definitely not "web", but is very "indie"
# 17:36 bear the core xmpp servers now all have web methods for interacting
# 17:36 tantek bear - so because that's so unclear except to those inside xmpp - perhaps that's something the xmpp community needs to make very clear in a *simple* explanation somewhere
# 17:36 bear you can connect to an xmpp server using pure web tech
# 17:36 aaronpk maybe i would be more interested in xmpp if i knew about that
# 17:36 bear tantek - yep, that's why I erased a whole bunch of responses and realized that we still haven't gotten that new info out into the web
# 17:36 bret my use of IM has gone way down as my use if IRC has gone way up
# 17:36 aaronpk my only experience with xmpp was trying and miserably failing to set up a jabber server on parecki.com like 10 years ago
# 17:37 bear yea, you can now use pure javascript to interact with xmpp services
# 17:37 tantek bear, right, until there are primary sources about xmpp doing that - no need to document such info on a secondary site like indiewebcamp
# 17:37 bear their are two main libraries to do that - stanza.io and xmppftw
# 17:37 bret bear: are there any trivially set up node xmpp servers?
# 17:37 bret ejabberd was kinda confusing to set up
# 17:38 bear I tell folks to use Prosody now for the server - it's Lua based but easy to setup
# 17:38 bear i'm looking at the software list now to see if their is a nodejs version
# 17:41 tantek KevinMarks: you can lead those temptations to Wikipedia ;)
# 17:42 bear I enjoy being challenged by you all with some of my older proto-assumptions :)
# 17:43 gRegorLove Dreamhost offers basic xmpp service for your domain. I've actually set up a username @gregorlove.com on it and used it for a bit. I haven't used it regularly, though.
# 17:44 tantek bear, if only XMPP had been an MVP with a test suite, and actual complete implementations that interop'd per the test suite
# 17:44 tantek I mean, someone could still subset it to do that, but who will?
# 17:44 bear that is part of what the move to create a web interface has created
# 17:45 bear what exactly is the minum level of protocol required to implement it
benwerd joined the channel
# 17:45 tantek bear - it is a protocol, but it is certainly not minimum, given how everyone implements a different (small) subset
# 17:46 tantek jonnybarnes: great - you'll have to add yourself to the /Prosody page bear is creating
# 17:46 bear tantek - that is a purposeful design decision
# 17:47 bear XMPP at it's core is only a small set of items that allow custom implementations to federate and interoperate even across older servers
# 17:47 aaronpk wonders if anybody would send him jabber messages if he ran a jabber server at aaron@parecki.com
# 17:47 tantek bear - that's poor design and leads to bad implementability and bad interop.
# 17:48 tantek I predict at some point in the future someone *will* subset XMPP in that way, and basically obsolete the existing work to date (maybe wrap legacy implementations behind proxies)
# 17:48 bear it has lead to amazing interop because old and new servers all allow messages to pass thru
# 17:48 bear that's just the point - you don't need to wrap it in a proxy - any subset can pass thru any current server implementation
# 17:49 bear it's the clients that drive what they will respond/react to
# 17:49 kylewm aaronpk: XMPP is lonely for me since GoogleTalk stopped interoping with other servers
# 17:49 tantek so that minimal subset is not documented - that's the point
# 17:49 tantek which makes it too hard to implement = fewer clients / servers
# 17:49 bear google has not dropped it - they just turned off the server-to-server part
# 17:50 bear tantek - the minimal subset is documented as an IETF RFC
# 17:50 bear I don't know how much more standard it can get
# 17:50 tantek and results in people / companies dropping it, or dropping parts of it - but you can't really tell because there's no open test suite nor open source test suite deployment you can test against
# 17:50 aaronpk cause now they can replace XMPP internally and nobody would know
# 17:50 tantek interop done against one implementation at a time != standard
# 17:51 bear i'm tired of debating this - your using strawman arguments that are not even based on fact
# 17:51 bear their are test suites and open implementations of them
# 17:51 tantek then I stand corrected. presumably there's links to them on some XMPP page?
# 17:51 bear now, are they well advertised, that may be a point of contention - but exactly how easy is it to get PHPUnit to work across implementations?
# 17:51 tantek (there didn't used to be, and IETF is notorious for being bad about open test suites)
# 17:52 gRegorLove My outsider impression was google dropped it so they could have more of a walled garden: Google Hangouts
# 17:52 tantek PHPUnit is not a protocol / format standard - it's language-specific
# 17:52 bear my use of phpunit was to point out that not all test suites - even if open - are easy to use or well documented
# 17:53 tantek PHPUnit is not a test suite for formats/protocols - it's a test framework for *code* - very different
# 17:53 bear i'll finish that stub later - right now i'm not in a mood to be writing
shiflett joined the channel
# 17:56 bear i'm not grumpy at anyone here - most of my grump comes from the bad web based documentation - these things do exist but the standard that is set in this channel on things being well documented in a web form can be tedious to defend against
# 17:56 aaronpk ooh is there an XMPP bot I can chat with to get all the docs then? ;)
# 17:56 bear heck, most of the core parts of indieweb are not testable in the same manner your trying to hold XMPP up against
# 17:56 bear yes, in the Prosody chat room their is a bot that will respond to requests for help for all the relevant RFCs
# 17:57 snarfed (minor point: google dropping server-to-server definitely isn't equivalent to dropping xmpp entirely. e.g. one big difference is that third party xmpp clients still work with gtalk.)
# 17:58 bear i've been battling inside of the XSF for years about this point - so I may be a bit sensitive :/
bengo joined the channel
# 18:05 bear apoligizes for shutting down the conversation flow
j12t, shiflett and tantek joined the channel
cweiske and benwerd joined the channel
# 18:25 tantek bear - meant to say here - understand the mood/grumpiness. on this end I blame DHCP. Just wasted 1.5 hrs rebooting various devices because Apple can't seem to make OSX and iOS "standards based" networking (TCP/IP) work as reliably as AppleTalk.
# 18:25 tantek i.e. 15 years of OSX dev - and networking still sucks on OSX
# 18:26 tantek iOS appears to be slightly more reliable than OSX, but is still prone to odd device address conflict nonsense etc.
# 18:26 bear i'm glad this community allows for grumpiness and let's us all have room to grump and then recover :)
# 18:26 tantek e.g. upon rebooting the router, and waking my laptop: "Another device on the network is using your computer's IP address (192.168.1.101)" <-- as long as that dialog keeps showing up, I say to Apple's OSX network engineers - you suck at your job
# 18:27 tantek and people who wrote OS9 and earlier AppleTalk networking code before you were better engineers than you
# 18:27 voxpelli tantek: good thing discoveryd is getting reverted in 10.10.4
# 18:28 tantek pepperidgefarm: Remember when Macs had reliable networking before OSX? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
eschnou joined the channel
# 18:29 tantek bear - on a serious point - the stuff that has better web based documentation is taken more seriously these days
# 18:30 tantek because there is such a heap of growing bulshytt on the internet (yes, internet, beyond web) that without good documentations, citations etc. No one has time to believe anyone.
# 18:31 bear that's the pain I'm feeling as an grey beard - the "lore" is being lost because it is stored in some esoteric silos
# 18:31 bear and the younger generation only knows the web
# 18:31 tantek bear - no one person scales. Communities are necessary. Hence better up to date web based documentation tends to be an indicator of a healthier community.
# 18:31 bear yea, we are working with the xsf community to improve their web status
# 18:32 tantek And majority of standards are abandoned deadends (or worse, bad timesucks) without a healthy community.
# 18:32 tantek Thus the demand for easily refernceable/discoverable web docs is a good first level filter on how "good" a standard is.
# 18:32 bear we (xsf) have a very healthy community - just working on getting some places setup so they can cross from xml-backend devs to web
# 18:34 bear i'm in a call - I will be backfilling all of these in a bit
bengo joined the channel
# 18:34 tantek thanks bear - and also very glad you are here
bengo, snarfed and tvn joined the channel
jansauer_ and tvn joined the channel
# 19:02 tantek so much of FB's UI fails for me because of all those transient network failures with SSL that cause one or more JS to not load
# 19:03 tantek depending on JS, especially on an HTTPS only site, makes your site a lot more fragile
# 19:03 tantek having a UI to all my content / stuff that doesn't require JS under any circumstance is a massive indieweb itch for me
# 19:04 tantek I'm also convinced that anyone who can built an alternatively like that, assuming it's fast, has a chance of taking attention away from JS-dependent silos
# 19:13 tantek as in one place where you can give it all to them? ;) :P
interactivist and mlncn joined the channel
# 19:22 endi tantek: I think for most people it's a lot more insight/control (dare I say transparency) than they're used to having.
# 19:24 endi but yeah, certainly not owning your data. perhaps it's having visitation rights to your data :p
# 19:24 tantek do we have any pages on image / video formats and the challenges that folks have encountered e.g. with creating / uploading video to your own site?
# 19:25 tantek "more insight/control (dare I say transparency)" == "has nice shelves" ;)
# 19:25 tantek "visitation rights to your data" == "And he lets me in to see it whenever I want"
# 19:26 tantek feel free to steal/copy and reply to that tweet if you wish :)
# 19:27 endi oh yeah if I hadn't written that I would think it was a rip off of that :p
# 19:27 tantek do Google search results still show who +1'd a post? e.g. when a post shows up in search results
# 19:28 tantek wonders if there's some screenshot architve of what Google search results have looked like over the months and years.
# 19:28 Loqi tantek meant to say: wonders if there's some screenshot archive of what Google search results have looked like over the months and years.
# 19:29 endi I haven't seen _any_ G+ content in my searches for a while now. and I'm mostly logged in.
cmhobbs joined the channel
chalettu joined the channel
e-lima joined the channel
interactivist joined the channel
# 19:49 tantek and that's a few more windows closed in Firefox (and whatever reasons I had for having them open now contributed to the IndieWebCamp wiki as CC0.
j12t and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
bengo joined the channel
# 20:02 tantek well, Sacca at least, and he certainly is unique enough to not just be categorized as "what investors think"
# 20:03 tantek i.e. without reading the article (which I'd read before), I might have responded with something like: "sound like armchair entrepreneurs. i.e. if said investors are so smart, then they should go hire an entrepreneur in residence to build that."
fkooman joined the channel
# 20:04 endi or maximum loss of control by the user?
tilgovi joined the channel
# 20:05 tantek so here's the irony, if we actually get our collected *tech* together, and start scaling multiple indieweb solutions (i.e. not just the awesome work of Known / Withknown), that are all peering and federating super fast and realtime like
# 20:05 tantek then Twitter's best hope for "growth" would be to federate with us
LCyrin joined the channel
# 20:08 tantek things I'd like to see us get "right" before (even attempting) federating with Twitter: /vouch (or some other anti-spam equivalent), /block , and /mute
# 20:09 tantek which we can prototype using our existing pseudo-federation of POSSE+backfeed
# 20:09 endi personally when I saw Known as a publishing platform and brid.gy both in action working together with FB/Twitter was my 'woah' moment
# 20:10 tantek endi, indeed. Known + POSSE & Bridgy backfeed with FB/Twitter is definitely quite whoaworthy.
# 20:10 benwerd I would dearly love to see another scaled-up platform service in "competition" with Known, interoperating beautifully. Preferably a handful.
# 20:11 endi brid.gy surprised be w/ G+; even tho I can't POSSE there brid.gy pulled +1s and comments - that was an unexpected 'it just worked?!' moment :p
# 20:12 benwerd (We are working [slowly] to get Google+ POSSE released)
# 20:12 endi oh no that's not a knock on Known; G+'s history with write API is just what caused the lack of expectation
# 20:13 Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
# 20:14 benwerd Right - we had to jump through some interesting hoops to get API access
# 20:14 tantek wonders if MAUs are level or dropping (and how fast) on G+
# 20:14 benwerd They just removed G+ profiles from the navigation - my assumption is they're plummeting
# 20:15 tantek benwerd, we can take Sacca's summary for Twitter and instead apply it to the IndieWeb:
# 20:15 tantek 2. Make it easier for all to participate, and
# 20:15 tantek 3. Make each of us on the IndieWeb feel heard and valuable.
# 20:16 tantek snarfed, presto, there's your VISION for your, shamelessly stolen from Sacca with some editorial search/replace ;) ^^^
# 20:16 tantek is good at reverse engineering things, even English prose. >:D
# 20:17 snarfed tantek: my vision? you mean those are the next big challenges?
# 20:17 tantek snarfed: sorry, I mean your request for what are the next big challenges - at a high level VISION level
bengo, benwerd, newbie|2, j12t, tantek, Guerillero|BNC, interactivist and wolftune joined the channel
# 21:30 KevinMarks the other feeling I got reading sacca's piece is that these are all things twitter already does, but have been buriend by the kinds of hands-on PM efforts he is advocating
bengo joined the channel
# 21:31 cweiske kylewm, does woodwind remove h tags from posts it shows?
# 21:32 kylewm cweiske: yeah it looks like it, i've been slowly expanding the list of allowed tags
bengo joined the channel
lukebrooker joined the channel
# 21:34 cweiske aaronpk, does monocle not refresh its subscriptions?
# 21:35 cweiske it seems the subscription to my feed timed out, without being renewed
# 21:38 bear what Jeff Jarvis is talking about on TWiG now is very related to IndieWeb - about how comments need to be more about the trusted relationship. This fits into the model I hear here often said - comments should be vouched posts from your site to others via webmentions
bengo joined the channel
elima_ joined the channel
# 21:42 aaronpk cweiske: yeah there's a bug right now where it's not proactively refreshing before expiration, so it only refreshes if something new has been added before the expiration
# 21:49 cweiske like that TV series on that island with the bomb that had to be temporarily defused by typing in some code
# 21:50 kylewm that is a frustrating aspect of PuSH, that you can't quite get rid of polling
# 21:50 aaronpk because you always have to renew the subscription before it expires, which is basically a poll
# 21:51 kylewm cweiske: well you haev to have some cron at least, doesn't necessarily have to fetch the site
# 21:51 cweiske my hub could also set the default expiration duration to 100 years
# 21:51 aaronpk yeah i built monocle with no cron, which is why i'm in this situation :)
# 21:52 cweiske what does switchboard and superfeedr use as default expiration time?
# 21:52 aaronpk cweiske: the problem with long expirations is if you want to change hubs, subscribers wouldn't know about it until the subscription expires
# 21:53 kylewm aaronpk: you could do the check up to 1x/day when someone hits monocle.p3k.io
# 21:53 aaronpk there would need to be a redirect protocol to cover that situation
interactivist, gavinc and bengo joined the channel
lukebrooker, jansauer_, jansauer, mlncn, bengo, snarfed, nloadholtes, brianloveswords, KevinMarks, KartikPrabhu and frzn joined the channel
# 23:01 tantek packing up and heading over to MozSF HQ to setup for HWC tonight!
bengo, benwerd and yakker joined the channel
# 23:17 bret or pure http streaming micropub server
bengo, jjuran and wolftune joined the channel