Harriet Hageman is on my personal short list of people I hope President Trump is considering for vice president.
During a recent interview Hageman shows she is not going along with the pretending. Every word about Joe Biden and the length of time the issues have been visible is correct and accurate. “Who is running our country?” WATCH:
.
The full interview is below:
On “Forbes Newsroom,” Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-WY) reacted to President Biden’s debate performance with alarm, slamming the press for its coverage of Biden, questioning who is running the U.S., and whether she supports invoking the 25th Amendment.
.
As humiliating and demoralizing as Demented Joe is, vids of Bath House Barry & linebacker Big Mike or Harris blowing weed for fun and power brokers for career advancement more would be worse.
Who are Sundance’s preferred VP lists?
Found in the bin… 🙁
Ben Carson, I believe.
That’s all resume enhancement for progs.
Dilated eyes/pupils…explains the ever present aviators…
A ten year agreement with Ukraine…??? Wow!
.
It’s void. Requires the consent of the Senate.
.
She says “there is no evidence” of drugs right after Hageman points out the dilated pupils. Police forces around the country are going to be very disappointed to find out dilated pupils are not evidence of drug use.
dilated pupils are observable and articulable evidence that can allow an employer or police to drug test.
How would anybody have evidence? A very disingenuous comment!
The teenager interviewing Rep Hageman is quite a delight./sarc
Ha ha yes. That was an example of the resistible force interviewing the immovable object.
Dilated pupils. Could not walk a straight line without wobbling. Confusion. Disorientation. Slurred speech.
Yep Joe was DUI – Debating Under the Influence.
Did not know about the 10-year agreement. What is a
money-launderingtreaty for $1000, Alex?Biden signs 10-year security agreement with Ukraine
☝️ ☝️ ☝️
It’s a desperate measure to tie President Trump’s hands.
Laughable.
Epistemology. “Security agreement” vs “Treaty.” In 1787 they meant exactly the same thing.
Like using “assault weapons” vs “arms.
They’re the same thing in both instances but playing with the words covers an end-run around the Constitution. Only Congress can ratify a treaty. But a “security agreement” …well, hell yeah!
They treat the things as treaties after they are passed. Since it is an Act of Congress, voted on like any other bill, it is a law as well.
We need to move the Senate back to being Ambassadors from the State Governments, being placed in their offices in accord with the laws of each State. Then TREATIES need two-thirds of the Senate to pass it.
Good for Harriet Hagemen!
The Emperor has no clothes …
The more people calling out the truth, the better.
Also good to see more worthy options for VP.
Amen.
She very honest but stops short of calling out the kenyan who is calling the shots
You have to work up to things. In an election year timing is everything. The idea is to sharpen the focus of each message (and deliver each message at the right time).
Right now, the goal is to get the bulk of the population aware that Brandon isn’t running things. That was President Trump’s goal for the debate ad Harriet is promoting what he opened up.
The “who is” running things comes after that (the globalists — think WEF — and their minions. Obama being one, a!omg with the see eye a, administrative and military officials, and the lawfare actors). Most areas of U.S.life have been captured, but our real President is showing everyone the truth and exposing their lies.
I also hope Harriet is on the short list for vp. She knows how to expose corruption and lies and they can’t make her back down.
Harriet is great but too new in Congress to be a VP choice. Same with JD Vance. I like him very much, but he is too new as a junior congressman. Trump needs both of them in Congress when he is back in the Whitehouse.
The longer she is Washington D,C, the more likely someone will turn her into a career politician. She is great as she is, a citizen politician, like Trump. A truth teller. Shocking!
JD Vance is a plant. Sundance has proven that repeatedly.
JD Vance is a Never Trumper and I mean the “I hate Donald Trump” kind of Never Trumper.
Why would any Republican hate Donald Trump? What has he done to make Vance hate him especially if President Trump picks him for VP?
JD Vance, Never Trumper, in his own words.
Burgum as well.
You left off the “sarcasm” tag?
IMO, HH has to have solid, unquestionable proof that BHO is calling the shots before she starts accusations of that nature.
To know it personally and to be able to publicly prove it are two different things.
All the people around Biden in the White House are Obama’s Chicago Alinsky Mob. What other proof does she need and what difference would it make anyway.
Joe, Barry and their henchmen all have a well-documented history of burying evidence, using fake emails, deleting records and otherwise coving up their illegal activities. The people around them are sworn to Omerta.
Unless a drugged up Hunter Biden or Anthony Weiner lose another laptop somewhere you are not likely to find ‘solid, unquestionable proof.’
How very “gentlemanly” to impose that restriction on a clear America First PDJT supporter like Harriet, when the enemy all violate it three times daily before breakfast.
How about we get the truth out instead…
Like an oft-played song at President Trump’s rallies says, “You can’t always get what you want, but if you try sometime you’ll find, you get what you need.”
That POS needs to pay the ULTIMATE price. Make the actual event Pay Per View and we could pay off the National Debt!!!
She’s a lawyer. She’s not going to state anything that she herself is not sure of. She’s asking “who is running things?” Who else in the House or Senate have actually asked that question?
Hageman for VP, seconded, President Trump could do a lot worse; she nails Kamala Harris.
So much better shape last election!
Black dilated pupils then, too.
They misspelled “ruin.”
The economist is deep state. If they are putting out this cover its an indication the deep state has decided on their new chosen impostor.
No Country for Old Men
…in their dotage. FIFA
The Powers That (Should Not) Be have been trying for a couple years now to make some side hay by tarring PDJT simultaneously with the “too old” brush.
Thanks to our real President’s vitality, it’s been a 100% failure.
It’s nice, but it needs tennis balls.
Yeah, it does!!
Love her!
I have been a Hageman fan ever since I heard her at a Trump Wyoming Rally. I’m with Sundance on this one.
One of my more enjoyable fantasies is imagining her complete evisceration of her opponent in a VP debate.
Harris??
Too, too delicious.
She has a “take no prisoners” look about her.
Apologies for the double post…
On second thought, not sorry.
She is so FANFASTIC that twice is probably not enough 😎
My 2 cents. We’re on Biden Death Watch. He’s gone. Harriet H will be in Trump’s Cabinet or possibly Head of EPA. Not VP material yet: close but not fully vetted – too soon IMHO. HH Congressional seat can easily be filled by strong MAGA Wyoming conservative. Ben Carson for VP rewards Ben’s loyalty and commitment to MAGA principles. Sends the right message that Trump’s VP is not now nor ever can be compromised by the Deep State/DC Establishment. And I believe Sundance concurs.
She would be GREAT as POTUS after 4 as VEEP.
BTW, she is a hardcore Wyoming Conservative, that’s vetted enough for this Cowboy Stater!
She would be the Ivermectin for the parasitical EPA.
Just what the doctor ordered.
Completely disagree. She’s smart and knows what the constitution says about liberty. Bring a new approach that isn’t besotted with years of DC corruption.
I have zero experience and would be light years better than the last 4 anti-American buffoons to hold the office.
She’s got 6 generations of Wyomingites in her family! No wonder she’s a no-nonsense patriot. The people of her state ADORE her!
Steely…something which no other Republican seems to be.
Wonder if we could clone her….🤔
Someday Harriet might be the USA’s Steel Lady.
I’ve seen hints of Thatcher in her ever since she ran for Congress.
Soo we have after all American Maggie T….I can see in her eyes she is fearless with bit a real Indian blood in circulation..she would chew any RINO/DINO and other clowns and spit out..Go Harriet Go !!!! if woman as VP that ‘s it…if man-Col.DOUGLAS MACGREGOR …VSGPDJT you ask me daily about VP choice here is !!!!!
I think that comparison is apt. That’s how I see her.
And I pray one day she will rise to a position where she can do for America what Margaret did for Britain.
Whoops I really have to return to reading the whole thread before commenting! Same thought just expressed, Betsy.
She is masterful!!
Bless you, Betsy, for bringing this wonderful speech to us.
You’re so welcome, harriet. I’ve never forgotten it..and on listening again, her “fed ups” then have only gotten worse.
I’ve been a fan of hers since she primaried that blonde bimbo Cheney.
She made mincemeat of Cheney. It was glorious!!!
She is Formidable.
I wouldn’t want to cross her, that’s for sure 😎
I’d never guess HH to be conservative by looking at her, but what a trade up considering the prog she replaced!
Thank you, Wyoming!
A woman who truly would not be chosen because having a token woman VP is trendy.
A good ten years younger than the other fine candidate, Ben Carson, which is a plus because she’d still be young enough to run for her own term as president.
It’s not that I think Carson is “too old”, I think the presidency is a demanding job and not for someone who is at a time in life when he is slowing down.
We have to admit, Donad J. Trump is something of an anomaly when it comes to aging.
I have to disagree on Ben Carlson. The man is doing tons of tons media if you pay attention. He is also a non politician which is my #3 criteria. #2 being a man of faith and #1 being 100% loyal and trustworthy to DJT. Ben Carlson is thoughtful in his responses and I feel like people take that as “slow”. The man is a BRAIN surgeon for goodness sake. Someone who would be thoughtful and careful in what he does. So no, he is not slowing down. Not that I dislike HH for VP but at the heart of it she is a politician. And a new one at that. Not enough time has gone on to see if she is trustworthy for me…
I like Carson but not as VP. He’d be 76 in ’28. I’m 77 and still in good health …but there is no way I would have the stamina that job requires. Trump is an exception.
Of course Joe Biden is on drugs! Any senior with the visible conditions Joe exhibits should be treated. From the brain freezes, mumbling, stumbling, crab claw hands held abnormally at his sides and his Parkinsons gait, Not to treat these with drugs would be medical malpractice.
Follow up question would be “Given that a non doctor can see Joe is struggling, why wouldn’t the white house doctor prescribe drugs to help Joe? Are you saying that his doctor is allowing Joe to deteriorate without prescribing helpful medicine? How inhumane.”
And lastly, when Joe’s lie squad says he has jet lag, a cold, he’s tired, or he over prepared, why should we trust that our president can do any better when he meets with foreign leaders or his cabinet? Doesn’t the act of making excuses say that in any given situation he could perform the same as in the debate? Is this really the best America can expect from our president?
The Economist magazine shows it best with a walker on the front cover with the title:
NO WAY TO RUN A COUNTRY.
We don’t have to wonder, we have the evidence. EVERY time Biden meets with foreign leaders he embarrasses himself and embarrasses the USA. He says or does something stupid. He has to cut short the visit, skip the formal dinner, go to bed early and otherwise fails to be fully engaged. He did that at the G7, the NATO summit, at the G20 last year. EVERY TIME.
He went to bed for a week after getting back from Europe. Said it was debate prep. That’s an impossibility. He can’t remember his lines. CNN ikely gave him the questions like Hillary & he still collapsed. Many Democrats still on board simply because Democrats live in a State of Delusion & have for most of their misbegotten lives.
Who is running the country?
Same people who have been for years.
The unelected, unaccountable bureaucracy.
The question is, why are they so out in the open about it now?
Over-confidence.
Why?
Ever growing panic ever since DJT came down the stairs.
It’s not that suddenly they are being out in the open, it’s that now they have nowhere to hide.
There’s something about her eyes that belies her words. Not quite sure, maybe it’s just a strong lens in her glasses that makes them look off-kilter.
Yes, she can definitely improve her TV appearance with an eye wear update (or contacts). She is such an awesome patriot – I’m in favor of all the media exposure she can get!
She’s wonderful in committees, very articulate, super sharp.
Come on, DJT! Here is your VP and a great person to follow after your term.
While I really like people who don’t pretend, I am leery of anyone who has already served in Congress. Has the Deep State bribed Hageman yet?
By the way, I don’t listen to Biden or Harris AT ALL, so I was shocked when I accidentally heard a montage of the VP spouting the following word salad over and over and over again in many different scenarios:
“The significance of the passage of time is significant in that the passage of time is significant. So if we take the significance of the passage of time to be significant we can see that there is significance in the passage of time.”
How can ANYONE take this babbling fool–and the other pretender who thinks he’s running the country–seriously?
Sounds like Kamala is trying to copy the quote from Donald Rumsfeld given in 2002:
“Reports that say that something hasn’t happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don’t know we don’t know. And if one looks throughout the history of our country and other free countries, it is the latter category that tends to be the difficult ones.”
The difference is that Rumsfeld actually makes sense – Kamala not so much.
😱
She doesn’t know what she doesn’t know.
I know plenty of babbling fools who take Kamala seriously!
They can be bribed at any level. Seen any State or County reps lately?
Harris served up that particular salad, if memory serves, a couple of years ago at least. It was the moldiest ever…
Glad to hear it’s still circulating!
Suburban Philly white moms: HERE!
She would make an excellent choice the not to be. Im one who thinks DJT is told who to pick same w Pence. So we will see, its that or his choices are still so bad. Ex MAGAs part of the top 5? He should have learned by now.
It would be interesting to hear you say WHO is telling DJT who to pick.
I don’t see anyone who has that much power or sway over DJT.
We can only hope Trump is wiser this time.🤷🏻♀️
We can only hope that people who support PDJT stop buying the neverTrumper narrative that he’s not wise.
Burgum?
Yes. On many issues, she is informed and shoots right from the hip. She is what a representative should be. 🇺🇸🇺🇸
What did HH do before she was elected? Resume matters IMO. I personally like real world experience – not some lawyer who climbed the government ladder all his/her life (not that this is what HH is).
She was a trial attorney. I’m not sure it was completely attached to the government ladder. What I think is different about her is she reads the bills and questions things. She doesn’t shy away from confrontation on important things as far as I’ve seen.
“Has no management experience, her father was a Wyoming pol, she placed 3rd in a run for Gov, backed Cruz over Trump in ’16. Has never won a contested election. Wyoming ’22 primary against Cheney would have been won by anyone not named Liz.”
If Trump picks her, I trust him. But she has too many question marks for me.
Hmmmm…
For me no management experience is a problem. This initially was why I was so interested in DJT – he was completely familiar with being in charge….not just some big mouth politician.
We will see…she’s a VERY long shot anyway.
Some of the questions are brutal: “Has Majorkas gone rogue?” <<< Great question
Majorkas is a Cuban spy, IMHO. So, yes. Great question. And just where is his vetting?
And the answer to anyone who has watched or listened to Michael Yon or Ann Vandersteel understands that Mayorkas is personally involved in trafficking illegals into the U.S.
Mayorkas is PERSONALLY & DIRECTLY involved in illegal alien trafficking. There are multiple records of eyewitnesses to that fact.
Rogue? Ha – he was rogue right out of oven – a Communist plant.
Would also mention that she sits on the judiciary committee. Think she would be a massive upgrade if made chairwoman.
The current occupant of the chair is bemusedly fixated on “Sternly Worded Letters.” By golly, maybe someday, if you wish upon a star, that might – well not really – accomplish something.
I think we on the right should refrain from pronouncing the impostor has dementia. Even if one is a doctor, refrain unless you have personally examined him. Nothing wrong with stating what we are observing. Remember what the left and their “experts” like “Dr.” bandi lee did and are still doing to President Trump. I think the correct way of saying it “he displays symptoms of someone with dementia” or something like that.
Other than that Ms. Hageman is correct.
Are you falling into the Democrat laid trap of “Don’t believe what you are seeing with your own eyes, instead believe what I am telling you”?
You may want to reread the entire post before going off on what your outrage tells you I am saying from the first sentence.
“…has all of the hallmarks…”
There, fixed it.
Agreed.
Hallmark channel.
excellent.
armchair speculation is extreme folly.
factual observation is irrefutable.
far better we stick to the latter, not the former.
have a great Independence Day, CCV! 🎆
For a job as important as the Presidency we do not need “beyond a reasonable doubt” level of proof to want to fire him.
Preponderance of Evidence is sufficient to know Biden is not capable. Politicians work for us. We don’t owe them anything special.
Political office is not “his job.” He does not have reinstatement rights or rights to appeal to a union rep. It is our job we are allowing him to temporarily hold.
You got it!
I am pretty much done with wasting energy over Marquis of Queensbury rules.
Say it all. Let the enemy attack and say “prove that.”
Because…we can.
Furthermore, the public needs to hear the proof.
Sorry, we call ’em as we see ’em.
“Who is running our country?”
Sigh! 😉
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/07/04/july-4th-2024-presidential-politics-resistance-day-1263/#comments
Representative Hageman is fast becoming my #1 best choice for VP, edging out Ben Carson for that job — who I pray may serve our country in some other important capacity.
Well, that was very refreshing, for a change, hearing from our Congresswoman Hageman.
Imagine that she didn’t giggle one.single.time.
She was lucid, observant, articulate, critical thinking on display.
How lucky we are to actually listen for more than 5 minutes to a person whose IQ is definitely much higher than those occupying the White House, and how sad it is to witness that reality today.
The time for exposing and eviscerating Slo Jo has long since passed. Now it is best to step back and hope he stays in the race. All of this is just theatre, and assisting the Uniparty goal of switching out joe without the replacement candidate not going through vetting and a year of campaigning and primary elections.
They can’t justify another stolen election with Biden, but they can with another candidate.
Yeah. Joe is no longer cheat worthy. They will at least need that for the ruse.
Our side shouldn’t be talking so much. Just show clips of Biden getting lost on stage and mumbling in the debates. Caption each clip with:
– 2 new wars
– 20% inflation
– illegal invasion
At least 50% inflation.
They leave off important categories like energy and food -“too volatile” – when measuring inflation. Convenient.
Definitely a short lister. Another is Jason Miyares, the Attorney General of Virginia. Both exhibit in their words and actions a certain ruthlessness that I personally feel is an essential character trait for anyone aspiring to the Presidency. Several on President Trump’s purported list appear to me to lack this trait.
Sounds great.
Has he launched any reciprocal actions against the Lawfare enemy?
I have in mind AG Andrew Bailey of Missouri who has launched at least two, described on his website here. I heard him interviewed on Lou Dobbs. Would appreciate what Treepers know about them.
https://ago.mo.gov/
We really need every red state AG to step up and counter the Soros-installed ones like “mine 🥺” in blueMA…
Hageman is based to the max and about as good of an upgrade over a warmonger you’re ever going to get.
Harriet Hageman is a warrior! After a term as VP, she would have the experience needed to be President –
she is American Maggie T…… Go Harriet Go !!!!
With the exception of the Trump years, who has been running our country since Bush 41 ?
All roads lead to langley…
H/T BK
Indeed.
Then on to London.
Don’t forget their money spigot (Blackrock).
The DS for the incalculably wealthy.
The 4th Branch of Govt
Hang in there Joe. Don’t cut-and-run. You are the only one who can out ballot collect the Bad Orange Man and save democracy from itself.
Betting markets on Trump VP choice.
https://www.oddschecker.com/us/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election/republican-vp-nominee
Lott and Stossel site: https://electionbettingodds.com/
I would be really happy if Harriet was selected to be VP. She is always up current events and tells it like it is.
She is stern, no-nonsense, and incredibly direct. Absolute perfection for President Trump’s VP. And I would support this over any other candidate under consideration at this moment.
While in Cheyenne yesterday, we saw a friend and client who has been Hariets’s bestie since childhood. She is super proud of her! I sent her this link.
🙂
What was her profession before congress?
Lawyer. Got her law degree from U of Wyoming College of Law
From Wickedpedia:
“Hageman served as a law clerk for Judge James E. Barrett of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. She has since worked as a trial attorney. In 1997, Hageman represented Wyoming in Nebraska v. Wyoming, a dispute over management of the North Platte River. In the case, she advocated against the United States Forest Service’s roadless rule.
In the 2016 Republican Party presidential primaries, Hageman supported U.S. Senator Ted Cruz and criticized Donald Trump.”
Since then, she has vocally supported President Trump, and voted against the excessive foreign spending bills.
Another thought occurs:
If 47 selects Ben Carson, Harriet should be the next replacement on the SCOTUS.
I could support that!
we need someone who is strong, will not give in to communism and will carry forth the MAGA agenda
as president in the 2028 election.
From what I have seen thus far she would possibly make a great candidste for VP, running for president
4 years later.
However, she needs to be vetted by we the people; we do not know enough about her yet.
I’d start with legislation she’s voted on, what it was, how she voted, that kind of stuff… example here:
https://hageman.house.gov/legislation/votes
Then I’d look at legislation she’s sponsored or co-sponsored; what is her record there?
Then I’d look at leadership positions in prior public and private life. Forex, I knew who Donald Trump was back in the 70’s. I bought his book when it first came out and it helped me in business. He has a long track record of executive success, and failure, we can examine. What’s hers? IDK. You make a good point.
That’s the beauty of the information age. The answers are out there. 👍
Need a toilet too.
Vet Harriet now!
Rep. Hageman is right on.
In a legal context, every legal action by a patient suffering from dementia, or any disease affecting thinking, could be challenged – what was their state of mind when they signed this document?
Same for Joe Biden. Things could not be more dire for our country.
Wow, How refreshing to hear someone raise the right questions and not pretend and deceive.
The best part is when confronted with the truth about journalist pretending not to see it this, the reporter doesn’t acknowledge the truth and deflects by I talked to your colleague. Too funny that these people have jobs as “journalists”. Shame on Forbes and what they have done to their founders vision.
Who is the child like female arguing with Harriet?
Not against Hageman, but we’ve seen an endless string of “conservatives” thrown at us over the years, most of whom were already or would soon become our enemies. Better to go slow on these things.
A quick scan of the Commie consolidator I follow has a lot of anti-Brandon content currently being headlined with very few PDJT headlines. Hence, I’d wait for things to die down a bit, see Hageman’s name bandied about as a potential VPOTUS, and see if they go on the attack or not, with ‘they’ being the Communist mouthpieces.
That analysis metric has worked pretty well over time, going way back to when PDJT was nominating cabinet members and we all remember the band of traitors that got by him on that. The Commies knew though. It was their mission to poison his administration and they did a darned good job of it.
In the end it’s PDJT’s choice. We have no say in the matter and I’ll bet his choice won’t swing MAGA votes to or away. Others, IDK. Does that person and 2028 matter? IDK. Good discussion material. Normally I’d say yes but we’re cutting historical ground.
A lot can happen between now and November though. Historic times. Just imagine if PDJT does beat the cheat. History right there, being a former GOP POTUS and winning non-contiguous re-election. 👍
Yup Sundance I’m with you 100% on this one…
I have said it many times on this site and have been trashed for saying it…
Can’t wait to see who agrees now…
It’s time move away from these Male Republicans…
And I will say this as I did the other day…
If the ticket ends up being Harris and Mayor Pete – If Hageman does not want the job..I say give it to Tulsi Gabbard…
She would slaughter both Harris and Mayor Pete… Do what ever it take to win…then sort it out after the election
Honest Question Sundance – If Hageman accepts does this re-open the door for Cheney? that’s a big problem if it does
As a female, I would be happy with whoever is best for the job, simple as that.
I can never get past Tulsi’s WEF past, no matter what she says now.
She’s only been in Congress for a year and a half….but, I’ve been highly impressed with her.
I don’t have a dog in the VP race. Of those on the announced list I would prefer Byron Donalds. He is aggressive and I trust him. Ben Carson is a good man and I trust him too, but I think the dems would run all over him (like they did in his primary).
I look forward to the day when we can have statesmen and not Street fighters on the political battlefield. We are not there yet.
Hageman is an intellectual street fighter. I could get excited about her as a VP pick.
Meanwhile, on Univision this morning they were showing the results of a presidential “poll” comparing Trump with Michelle Obama.
Not surprisingly, Michelle Obama carried 50% vs 43%.
As Sundance likes to write… “It begins”.
…
Wyoming has a single US House representative… it might be a loss to the State to have Hagemen go to the WH.
I posted this site from Little and Syosset upthread: https://electionbettingodds.com/
It shows PDJT at 58.3%, Mooch at 4.9%. (Updated every minute.)
The ‘Why This Beats Polls’ section explains methodology.
Whoops — that’s Lott and Stossel’ — sorry!
To paraphrase Orwell, truth telling is now a revolutionary act! Bravo to Representative Hageman for calling it what it is: DEMEN-CHA!
I agree Sundance Harriet Hageman is a strong candidate.
What a change from Liz Cheney!
Thank you people of Wyoming.
The ‘media’ all know about Biden’ health problem; just as, the ‘media’ all knew about JFK’s women problem. 🙄
And FDR’s walking problem.
By the by – I’m sure there are plenty here who remember how the media splashed Ronald Reagan’s physical and mental decline all over the mindspace.
But 100% denial on JoeBama.
The narrative “system” is as two-tiered as the injustice one, and has been for a very long time.
.
Speaking of pretending, I just typed “prehistoric men did the hunting,” in my DuckDuckGo search engine and what came up was page after page of pseudo-scientific articles by NPR, the Smithsonian, Scitecdaily and a host of others that claimed that wasn’t true, that women were the hunters in hunter gatherer societies.
Hunter-gatherer societies that exist today prove this is demonstrably false…with few exceptions, women did the gathering and men did the hunting, at least of large game. Yet I went several pages and not a single piece told the truth!
My wife is a retired CRNP who specialized in geriatric cases and she opined that Biden was in the mid stages of senile dementia…and it was FIVE years ago she told me that!
Pretending is the order of the day in the woke West, so why not pretend that nobody in the media noticed that old, old Joe is still on top of his game?
Now all the cave women are hunting for a new candidate.
My hope is President Trump will pick someone who can carry the torch of America first into 2029. I’m not sure Ms Hagemen is that person.
what makes you think that? She seems America First all the way. Her record so far says she is legit too.