Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Facebook IPO lawsuits to be heard in New York

    (Reuters) - Dozens of lawsuits against Facebook Inc, the NASDAQ exchange and various underwriters will be centralized before a federal judge in New York, who must sort through the legal aftermath of Facebook's botched initial public offering.

    A panel of federal judges on Thursday ordered that cases filed around the United States be transferred to U.S. District Judge Robert Sweet in Manhattan. Facebook had requested the transfer, while some investors sought to keep their cases in California.

    While some of the cases concern different defendants and claims, "they do involve enough common questions of fact, related circumstances and common discovery to warrant centralization," the panel said.

    Facebook said in a statement that it was pleased with the ruling, and that it would "vigorously" defend itself. An attorney for some of the California plaintiffs declined to comment, while a NASDAQ representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Investors say they lost money due to technical glitches on the Nasdaq stock market and accuse the company of selectively disclosing unflattering information about its business prospects to Wall Street analysts who then shared it with privileged investors.

    The lawsuits, which are seeking unspecified damages, could cost Facebook millions of dollars to defend as it strives to put the IPO behind it.

    Facebook's stock tumbled as much as 50 percent after its debut at $38 per share. It closed at $21.95 on Thursday.

    In at least 33 lawsuits seeking class action status, investors have asked courts to hold the company and its underwriters responsible for causing their losses.

    Facebook has said that it did not violate any rules and that NASDAQ was to blame for trading glitches on the day of the offering.

    Grouping cases together keeps similar lawsuits from proceeding at the same time in different courts.

    Lawsuits against NASDAQ OMX Group Inc, which accuse the exchange of being negligent in failing to execute trades in the face of record-breaking volume during the IPO, will also be in front of Sweet.

    But the exchange has already asked that their cases proceed on a separate track from the Facebook lawsuits.

    The case is In Re: Facebook Inc, IPO Securities and Derivative Litigation, U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, No. 12-md-2389.

    (Reporting by Basil Katz in New York and Dan Levine in San Francisco; editing by Carol Bishopric)

    What do you feel about this article?

    Loading...
     

    19 comments

    • Rod  •  1 month 3 days ago
      Before this company went public, I didn't hear a single bit of negative news concerning Facebook. That was my first red flag and the only one I needed to know what a scam it was. If you didn't do your research, you should have.
    • Ed  •  1 month 4 days ago
      What I like to know is how this college drop-out manage to pull the biggest IPO scam in Wall Street history, I guess time will answer that question and we're witnessing the beginning of the end of Facecrooks.
    • swrich  •  1 month 3 days ago
      I still cant believe I almost bought Facebook stock. I don't have much money but I thought it would be a sure thing. Boy was I wrong! CAn you believe there are entire cities in California that invested millions
      In Facebook thinking the same thing i was and these towns were on the verge of bankruptcy to begin with.
    • Doug  •  1 month 3 days ago
      I heard goldman and sachs say that facebook was worth $50 billion dollars before facebook went Public
    • jason m  •  1 month 3 days ago
      Facebook sucks #$%$!! All it does is feed into America's narcissism. No one cares that you just ate at Taco Bell!!
    • Barry  •  1 month 3 days ago
      SCAM
    • Pepe Pepe  •  1 month 3 days ago
      Sorry ... but if you were stupid enough to get Facebook toilet paper stocks .... then you are stupid enough to lose your money.

      The signs were VERY CLEAR. You can't cry uncle after you decided to IGNORE the very bright vegas size neon signs on your way to Loserville.
    • glenn  •  1 month 3 days ago
      YES as they have bought U.S. District Judge Robert Sweet in Manhattan,for peanuts or the pron on his facebook logs
    • FonGu  •  1 month 3 days ago
      The stock market is a RISK. When one buys stock they assume the risk. So a bunch of idiots risked capital in a company that produces no tangible goods and many market analysis sites said was a poor risk/over valued and are now suing to get their money back. If the judge has any balls he will throw the case out.
    • John  •  1 month 4 days ago
      FB's CFO was in cahoots with the underwriters to pump up the company's valuation, which was a laugh for those of us who know better than to value the company at $100 Billion. Sure, NASDAQ had some issues that need addressed, but even after the IPO the stock still continued to free-fall. I guess Suckerberg will still blame the exchange for that as well. I hope he gets dragged across the coals.
    • Chris  •  1 month 4 days ago
      Theres a monster in my closet
    • KS  •  1 month 4 days ago
      Mark Z ripped everyone off, just like Bernie Madoff, but did it legally. He really pulled one over on investors.
    • Chris  •  1 month 4 days ago
      700,000$ inside a safe
    • Dave  •  1 month 3 days ago
      IPOs do not guarantee a profit. It's always a bit of a gamble.
    • John D  •  1 month 3 days ago
      People need 2 get a life.
    • Jaime  •  1 month 4 days ago
      Hmmm X:( .... I don't know what to think....
    • Contrary to popular opini ...  •  1 month 3 days ago
      How is this a legitimate case? Everyone knows that IPO's are a terrible investment untill 6 months to a year after their release.
    • Mike  •  1 month 3 days ago
      If they had listened to me they wouldn't have to go to court. Idiots I told them the stock wasn't worth it.
    • Ilona  •  1 month 3 days ago
      ifɗ there was a guarantee of gain wouldn't that be Like insider trading?
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]