Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity Paperback – April 16, 2018


Political polarization in America is at an all-time high, and the conflict has moved beyond disagreements about matters of policy. For the first time in more than twenty years, research has shown that members of both parties hold strongly unfavorable views of their opponents. This is polarization rooted in social identity, and it is growing. The campaign and election of Donald Trump laid bare this fact of the American electorate, its successful rhetoric of “us versus them” tapping into a powerful current of anger and resentment.
           
With
Uncivil Agreement, Lilliana Mason looks at the growing social gulf across racial, religious, and cultural lines, which have recently come to divide neatly between the two major political parties. She argues that group identifications have changed the way we think and feel about ourselves and our opponents. Even when Democrats and Republicans can agree on policy outcomes, they tend to view one other with distrust and to work for party victory over all else. Although the polarizing effects of social divisions have simplified our electoral choices and increased political engagement, they have not been a force that is, on balance, helpful for American democracy. Bringing together theory from political science and social psychology, Uncivil Agreement clearly describes this increasingly “social” type of polarization in American politics and will add much to our understanding of contemporary politics.

The Amazon Book Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.

Get to know this book

Editorial Reviews

Review

“One of the most important books this year . . . . This is the kind of research that will change not just how you think about the world but how you think about yourself.” -- Ezra Klein ― Vox

“Sobering. . . . Mason argues that factors such as class, race, religion, gender, and sexuality used to cut across one another to a significant extent. . . . In the past decades, though, ‘partisan, ideological, religious, and racial identities have moved into strong alignment. . . . A single vote can now indicate a person’s partisan preference as well as his or her religion, race, ethnicity, gender, neighborhood and favorite grocery store.’” -- Yascha Mounk ―
New Yorker

“Highly recommended. . . . In describing American politics today, Mason argues that partisan identity (Democrat or Republican) has become a 'mega-identity' because it increasingly combines a number of different identities. . . . And which party people belong to is important because there is some evidence that instead of people choosing their party affiliation based on their political views (and changing parties if their views are no longer represented by that party), they shift their views to align with their party identity." -- Perry Bacon Jr. ―
538

“Recent debates about partisan polarization have focused primarily on ideology and policy views. In
Uncivil Agreement, social identity moves to the center of how to think about the differences that divide the country.”
  ―
New Books Network

Uncivil Agreement opens a window to a better understanding of the 'why' behind the polarization of contemporary American politics. This is a groundbreaking book, combining an interesting and important theoretical approach with strong empirical data, and it will have real impact.”­ -- David P. Redlawsk, University of Delaware

“A must-read for anyone trying to understand the increasingly polarized nature of American politics. Mason offers a psychological identity-based explanation for today’s polarized politics, an explanation that provides insights both into its most important attitudinal and behavioral consequences, but also into possible approaches that could help move the American public a few steps back from the precipice.” -- Richard R. Lau, Rutgers University

“The mutual disdain felt by Democrats and Republicans around the country has reached toxic levels, and it is having profound consequences for the quality of our policies, not just our politics. How did we get here? Mason’s brilliantly designed research and compelling writing reveal the most convincing explanation to date.” -- Nicholas Valentino, University of Michigan

"Mason describes social polarization in the USA and its political parties, a sorting that generated distinct psychological and behavioural outcomes. Americans have sorted into politically partisan (party support, based on ideology and policy positions) groups and social (racial, religious, geographic, ideological) groups. Because of social sorting, greater polarization of both parties has occurred. This polarization has generated greater partisan prejudice, more political action and more emotionality (reactivity). Her book explains how a well-sorted set of partisan and social identities, a phenomenon beginning in the 1950s and well underway before Obama was elected, is uniquely capable of motivating three polarizations—more partisan, more action and more emotion." -- Eleanor D. Glor ―
The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal

About the Author

Lilliana Mason is associate research professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University’s SNF Agora Institute and Department of Political Science. She is author of Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ University of Chicago Press; Illustrated edition (April 16, 2018)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 192 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 022652454X
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0226524542
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 9.6 ounces
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 8.9 x 6 x 0.6 inches
  • Customer Reviews:

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Lilliana Mason
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Lilliana Mason is an associate professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University and the SNF Agora Institute

Customer reviews

4.3 out of 5 stars
233 global ratings

Customers say

Customers find the content good, clever, and provocative. They also appreciate the author's careful empirical research, which makes the book compelling and timely. However, some find the book hard to read and have difficulty seeing the charts and graphs on their iPad based Kindle reader.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

9 customers mention "Research"9 positive0 negative

Customers find the research clever, careful, and one of the best explanations of current polarization in the country. They also say the book is an introductory work and the statistical data and interpretation are top-notch. Customers also mention the concept is interesting, but the analysis is repetitive. Overall, they describe the book as approachable and compelling.

"...The book is convincing in part because it makes intuitive sense (at least to me) but mostly because of the author's clever and careful empirical..." Read more

"...Her scholarship, statistical data, and data interpretation are topnotch. She shows the widening gap between Republicans and Democrats...." Read more

"Dr. Mason's book is not only approachable, but it is makes a compelling argument that we are driven by the proclivities of our identities -..." Read more

"This book constitutes an excellent empirical demonstration the that hyper-partisanship that we see in the current era both reflects and compounds..." Read more

8 customers mention "Content"8 positive0 negative

Customers find the content interesting, enjoyable, and readable. They also mention that the book is short.

"...The book is convincing in part because it makes intuitive sense (at least to me) but mostly because of the author's clever and careful empirical..." Read more

"...science, and that should go to tell you that this book is worth the read...." Read more

"...The content is strong and interesting, however. I can't say if all the books are built this way, but it might be safer to get the Kindle edition." Read more

"This is a highly readable research project to discern how and why the divide has deepened between Republicans and Democrats...." Read more

4 customers mention "Visual presentation"0 positive4 negative

Customers find the visual presentation of the book difficult to read. They mention that the charts and graphs don't show up on their iPad based Kindle reader, and they have to squint to read the graphs.

"...I read the Kindle version of the book, and I found that I had to squint to read the graphs. But it was still very much worth it...." Read more

"...I did have a problem seeing the charts and graphs on my iPad based Kindle reader, though I didn’t have a similar problem on my Android based phone..." Read more

"...Her data presentation is abysmal...." Read more

"The figures don't show up! Waste of money...." Read more

3 customers mention "Readability"0 positive3 negative

Customers find the book hard to read and difficult to follow.

"...The angle is significant enough to make the book hard to read. The content is strong and interesting, however...." Read more

"...Without actual numbers to work from, sometimes it's difficult to follow the author's obviously well-constructed argument." Read more

"...but this book is so academic. Not readable for those of us just trying to figure out how we got here" Read more

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2018
Uncivil Agreement addresses the topic of polarization from the perspective of political psychology. The author advances the view that social identity is more important than opinions on issues as a driver of political behavior in general and polarization in particular.

The book is timely because it can help to explain the high levels of political anger that we see around us. The book is convincing in part because it makes intuitive sense (at least to me) but mostly because of the author's clever and careful empirical research. Even a skeptic should find her studies persuasive.

We might naturally assume that our political selves are shaped by our interests and our views of policy. The alternative that Mason proposes is that our political selves are shaped by our sense of where we fit in socially.

From this alternative perspective, the increase in polarization arises from the fact that people are becoming more certain of where they belong in the social sphere. Our social class structure has become more segregated. Fewer people cross the bridges between status groups defined by location, education level, wealth, race, religiosity, etc.

As the social structure solidifies, political antagonism increases. People who are locked into their identity as Democrats only care about seeing Democrats win and Republicans lose. Republicans, too, have come to care more about winning than about issues. I would note that Democrats loved Barack Obama's victories, even though at the state level the party hollowed out while he was President. By the same token, Republicans love Donald Trump's victory, even though it seems to be devastating the party's future.

Another trend is an increase in what Mason calls "blind" activism. That is, political activism driven by anger and enthusiasm, rather than by reason and practical considerations.

I think that the publisher is wrong to position this as a purely academic book or textbook. It should be of value to the many people who have a general interest in the nature of political behavior. I read the Kindle version of the book, and I found that I had to squint to read the graphs. But it was still very much worth it.

Finally, I cannot resist saying that if you like this book, you may also like my own more amateurish effort, The Three Languages of Politics. Although my book is very different in style from Uncivil Agreement, I think that the two books share some of the same underlying psychological outlook.
35 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on September 16, 2018
Lillian Mason has done a rigorous job of taking us into the weeds of partisan politics in America, which is dividing our country, making us toxic toward one another, and making us fight for our tribe rather than fight for our common goal of American health and strength. Her scholarship, statistical data, and data interpretation are topnotch. She shows the widening gap between Republicans and Democrats. Today, Republicans are more white, more wealthy, and more religious than Democrats. Both parties are guilty of partisan politics, excesses, and indulgences that speak more to their tribalism than fair-mindedness.

However, Mason tries too hard to be non-partisan in her account because by showing the sins of both the Republicans and Democrats, she implies a moral equivalency that cannot stand. Specifically, as I write we have a president who lies everyday on Twitter and elsewhere, takes babies away from their mothers, pens them in internment camps, and at Helsinki dismissed US Intelligence and sided with Russia. In spite of this president's egregious behavior, he enjoys 90% approval from Republicans and 80% approval from white Evangelicals. Such moral bankruptcy is even called out by conservative operatives like David Frum, Steve Schmidt, and Rick Wilson. Therefore, the sins of Democrats, whether they be economic spending excesses, identity politics, and whatever else, are not a moral equivalence of support for a sociopath president.
Mason should have made this non equivalence clear in her book. Secondly, she should have pointed out that Republicans have been dog whistling racism for decades and this culminated into the president we have now. Thirdly, Mason should have made it clear that not all party opposition is unreasonable. It is very reasonable for people on both parties to oppose a liar and a criminal. My guess is that Mason was trying too hard to be non partisan to make this point clear. Perhaps she wrote this book before the criminality unfolded from the White House. I just want to add the full story. I am writing as no Kool-Aid drinker for liberalism. In fact, I find the criticism of the current White House more cogent and convincing from the aforementioned David Frum, Steve Schmidt, and Rick Wilson.
76 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on November 15, 2018
Dr. Mason's book is not only approachable, but it is makes a compelling argument that we are driven by the proclivities of our identities - especially now compared to four or six years ago. This fact has already shown to be dangerous for how we perceive activism and the other side - which in turn has affected how we might think about politics, the other side, and voting. (Ah!) I recommend this book to all my academic friends and colleagues (my advisor has told me to calm down a little, I admit), and also to my friends and family. I'm not in the field of political science, and that should go to tell you that this book is worth the read.

Reading this book might even make holidays spent with the friends and family members who voted for Trump or ultra-right candidates (or fringe candidates) a little easier to get through - because now you'll know why they always have an argument for everything! Reading this has helped me not start arguments with my former Democrat-leaning, now Trump-voting grandpa and even my uber-Democrat uncle. (For real. Knowledge is power!)
3 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on August 16, 2018
I ordered this book after hearing a fantastic interview with the author, Lilliana Mason, on the You are Not So Smart podcast. Although I'm only a third of the way through reading the paperback, I have to say the University of Chicago Press put out a shoddy product. The text the left-hand side of the book slants upward toward the spine, while the text on the right-hand side slopes down. The angle is significant enough to make the book hard to read. The content is strong and interesting, however. I can't say if all the books are built this way, but it might be safer to get the Kindle edition.
4 people found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Tom
3.0 out of 5 stars No Charts, Tables or Graphs
Reviewed in Canada on September 5, 2018
I hate when non-fiction books with figures, charts, graphs are either poorly displayed on the e-Reader or not displayed at all. That is the case here. I would think Kindle on iPad should be able to hand charts and graphs with no problem. But, no. All I could see was the figures title and that is all. So frustrating.

The book itself starts off really good and it gets very scholarly. Because it veers into more of a research thesis vs a book targeted to lay people, it makes for dry reading for the second half. It doesn't help I can 't see the data represented in the book.

Overall, Lilliana Mason does a good job making her point. It is very appropriate for our time.