Google apps
Main menu

Post a Comment On: Bruce Charlton's Notions

1 – 6 of 6
Anonymous Leo said...

Thank you for calling my attention to a writer and clergyman I have had only a nodding acquaintance with who is worthy of much greater attention.

Bach and Vermeer had once passed into relative obscurity before gaining near-universal acclaim, so perhaps Traherne will become better known in the future.

17 May 2015 at 19:32

Blogger Unknown said...

Your posting is a gift! I had not heard of Traherne, and I am eager to expand upon my reading of Christian writers, so your gift arrived just at the right time. Thank you!

17 May 2015 at 19:35

Blogger drizzz said...

I discovered Traherne through this old blog http://tomwills.typepad.com/thenewchristianyear/ which reprinted Charles William's "The New Christian Year" and "The Passion of Christ" I noticed Traherne's quotes were always worth saving.

18 May 2015 at 00:53

Blogger Wm Jas Tychonievich said...

Traherne is an immensely moving writer. I discovered him via Aldous Huxley, who cites him extensively in The Perennial Philosophy. It's interesting to learn that C. S. Lewis also appreciated him.

18 May 2015 at 05:47

Blogger Bruce Charlton said...

@drizzz- Yes, I have a copy of that book; and tried to follow the readings daily for a while - but I'm afraid it became a chore after a few weeks, due to my own personal deficits.

@WmJas - I get the impression Traherne is most known (although even then not much so) as a generic mystical writer, via Huxley and another compliers of lists; or else as one of the - obscure -'Cambridge Platonist' group.

Both of these classifications seem seriously to distort and misrepresent his fullness of stature; which is specifically Christian and only very incidentally Platonic.

I think I first came across him in the Oxford Book of English Prose edited by 'Q', where the quality of the prose comes across; but the special quality does not especially stand-out among a collection of outstanding but detached-paragraphs from English writers of an era when the language reached a peak.

Generally (despite the importance of the subject to me) I don't find 'mystical' writers to be readable in quantity, or readable at all. For example, Lady Julian of Norwich disappointed me; and I could make no headway with Evelyn Underhill's collection.

But Traherne - in the Centuries - is at a different level - I just bask in his language and goodness!

18 May 2015 at 06:43

Blogger Wm Jas Tychonievich said...

"Another compiler of lists"? Would that be Harold Bloom?

18 May 2015 at 19:21