A fascinating messaging and branding story is unfolding in the US political landscape -- and it's at the heart of go-to-market strategies. As a retired professional, I can walk on political minefields. So, here goes.
Republicans and Democrats each have constituencies comprising a wide variety of factions (microsegments) that have no real affinity to each other.
Republicans address the constituencies with different spokespeople and in different event streams, but they are united on a vision, mission and purpose (Flag, Patriotism, American Exceptionalism, Freedom).
Democrats have traditionally been fragmented along specific voting blocks (Civil Rights, Social Welfare, Human Rights) who are passionate about very complex issues. Democrats get into the weeds on their messaging with each of these factions. But, they don't have a coherent top line message.
It's important to consider the 'buyer's tolerance for complexity'. American voters don't have a high tolerance for complexity. And, Democrats have a tendency to make decisions more complex.
Take 'the crisis at the southern border'. That's one complex challenge. Democrats try to make us understand that 'fixing it' would require building on the current efforts to provide lawful pathways, easing the burden on host communities, matching immigration policies with the needs of the labor market, and addressing root causes of migration, while adhering to American legal and humanitarian responsibilities.
Republicans say 'We'll build a wall'.
Is that feasible? Not in the slightest.
Does everybody know that? Yep.
Why does it work? Because voters don't have tolerance for the complexity
At first, I thought that Democrats need to distil their platform and policies into simpler talking points. But, perhaps that's not possible. These are, after all, really complex issues. So, I began to think that Democrats need to steal a page from the Republican playbook. They need to kick the whole messaging thing 'up a notch'. They need to message at the 'brand' level about values, mission, and purpose.
Of course, if that's not done properly it can be insipid and uninspiring. You need the power of Arby's "We have the meats' messaging. I have been thinking that "We are the future. They are the Past" needs to be the core of the messaging. But, that is toothless and insipid.
Today I saw a Facebook meme that I think is powerful messaging.
"We Won't Go Back".
This is great top line messaging. It covers everything. Women's rights. Worker's rights. Civil rights. Human rights. Social welfare programs. Health care. Retirement welfare programs. It excludes nothing.
And it's emotive. "We're going forward" is toothless (and a bit scary). But if you tell me "We're not going back", I'm in the fight.
Please don't respond to this post with your political opinion. But, I am interested in your insights on messaging, branding and go-to-market.