Search for:

The Hiring Line Initiative empowers voters to achieve an economically just immigration policy. A properly regulated system will restore opportunities for left-behind Americans. There is a long history of legislation siding with employers’ preferences for foreign labor over Black Americans.

We have the receipts.

  • Ferguson: "Blacks will suffer the greatest deterioration in unemployment when the number of immigrants grows."
  • Washington: "To those of the white race who look to the incoming of those of foreign birth and strange tongue and habits...cast down your bucket where you are."
  • Jordan: "Too many have abused the very hospitality that we grant so freely. Unlawful immigratoin is unacceptable."
  • Loury: But for mass immigration, employers "would become a lobby on behalf of locking up fewer people, spending more money on education...because [employers] would be out of workers and they'd be looking for them somewhere."
  • King: "the removal of employer sanctions threatens to add additional U.S. workers to the rolls of the unemployed. Additionally, it would add to competition for scarce jobs and drive down wages."
  • Douglass: "Every hour sees the Black man elbowed out of employment by some newly arrived immigrant whose hunger and whose color are thought to give him a better title to the place."
  • Roger Wilkins: "We hear about Black families falling apart. But we don't hear anybody talking about putting Black men to work, giving Black families the economic wherewithal to stay together and raise their children."
  • Randolph: "The excessive immigration is against the interests of the masses of all races and nationalities in the country - both foreign and native."
  • Jordan: "Many American workers do not have adequate job prospects. We should make their task easier to find employment, not harder."
  • Opportunity: Immigration restriction legislation increased the importance of American labor.
  • The Messenger: less immigration gives power to Black workers
  • New York Age: Immigration restriction "materially helped to create new industrial opportunities" for Black workers.
  • Jordan: "The Commission is particularly concerned about the impact of immigration on the most disadvantaged within our already resident society."
  • Du Bois: stopping of cheap white labor has been the economic salvation of Black laobr.
  • Opportunity: immigration restrictions forced a demand for Black labor despite claims that it was neither needed nor desired.
  • Jordan: "There are people who argue that some illegal aliens contribute to our community because they may work, pay taxes, send their children to our schools, and in all respects except one, obey the law. Let me be clear: that is not enough."
  • The Messenger: Black Americans' industrial future is tied to immigration restriction.
  • Waller: Immigrants "readily afford a means by which commercial institutions may obtain cheap labor, thereby depriving native born Americans of the opportunity to work which is justly theirs."
  • New York Age: Immigration restriction will enable Black Americans to organize and demand recognition as an industrial factor.
  • Marcus Garvey: white immigration gives the employer "all the help he wants" to keep wealth away from Black Americans.
  • Douglass: "Employments and callings, formerly monopolized by us, are so no longer."
  • Bu Bois: "The competition of German and Italian barbers furnished the last and most potent reason for the withdrawal of the Negro."
  • The Messenger: Reduced immigration gives organized Black workers an advantage.
  • Pittsburgh Courier: "Indeed, there is good reason to believe that the economic progress of our group has been hindered by immigration."
  • Orlando Patterson: mass immigration "diluted and eventually trivialized the very special claims of Blacks for national attention."
  • Jordan: "it is both a right and a responsibility of a democratic society to manage immigration so that it serves the national interest."
  • Du Bois: "The stopping of the importing of cheap white labor on any terms has been the economic salvation of Ameican Black labor."
  • New York Age: The Great War gave Black Americans a foothold in the economic world; will mass immigration undermine that progress?
  • Jordan: "Immigration policy must protect U.S. workers against unfair competition."
  • National Urban League: "gaps made by the reduction in immigrant labor have forced a demand" for Black labor.
  • Marcus Garvey: Mass immigration will put Black Americans "in a similar condition or position as we were in 1913 before the war."
  • Waller: immigrants "flock to the already overcrowded cities and immediately proceed to deprive native Americans of employment by offering themselves at cheap prices."
  • Jordan: "Unless there is a compelling national interest to do otherwise, immigrants should be chosen on the basis of the skills they contribute to the U.S. economy."
  • Douglass: "Without the means of living, life is a curse, and leaves us at the mercy of the oppressor to become his debased slaves."
  • Morris: "ethnic-network recruiting and the spread of non-English languages in the workplace have, in effect, locked many Blacks out of occupations where they once predominated."
  • The Colored American Magazine: "Gradually Black and colored peoples have been replaced by White persons, Europeans for the most part."
  • Jordan: "As long as U.S. businesses benefit from the hiring of unauthorized workers, control of unlawful immigration will be impossible."
  • Chicago Defender: "The restrictions recently placed upon immigration to these shores ought to help us [Black Americans] if they do not help anybody else."
  • Jordan: "Those who come here illegally, and those who hire them, will destroy the credibility of our immigration policies."
  • New York Age: WWI presents Black Americans with the greatest industrial opportunities open to them since the Civil War.
  • Jordan: "As a nation of immigrants committed to the rule of law, this country must set limits on who can enter and back up these limits with effective enforcement."
  • Randolph: "This country is suffering from immigrant indigestion."

Before the War

The first wave of mass immigration after 1820 drove free Black workers from their fragile economic holds in the North. Employers preferred immigrant workers over Freedmen. And immigrant unions worked to drive Black workers off job sites.

The Great Wave

In the aftermath of the Civil War, free Black Americans briefly found new opportunities in the expanding industrial North. Black incomes grew to more than 70 percent higher than in the South in just a few years. The racial wage gap improved by nearly half over the next decade as more Black Americans moved north. But starting in the 1880s, what came to be known as the “Great Wave” of immigration once again afforded Northern industrialists the luxury of not hiring Black workers.

The Great Wave of immigration between 1880-1924 reduced the economic opportunities for Black Americans in the North. As they had before the war, immigrant unions viewed free Blacks and emancipated slaves as labor competition. Unions expelled their own white members if they were caught working on a job site with Black workers. Frederick Douglass’ own son, Lewis, who had served in the famed 54th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment, was barred from union membership and then protested as a scab for taking a non-union job.

The record levels of immigration also changed the political balance against Reconstruction. Most new immigrants settled in northern cities and joined the anti-Reconstruction Democratic Party. Thus, the Great Wave diminished both the economic opportunity and political power of Black Americans. By 1876, the emerging Democratic majority had negotiated the withdrawal of federal troops from the South.

Mass immigration was enough to keep most Black Americans trapped in the unreconstructed South for another half century.

The lasting symbol of the Great Wave, the Statue of Liberty, was conceived as a celebration of the liberation of American slaves. It was mere coincidence that the ships carrying new immigrants passed by the pedestal with the broken shackles around the statue’s feet. Ironically, the Great Wave ensured that Black Americans would remain economically shackled to the South decades after emancipation.

The Great Migration

The “Great Migration” of American Blacks moving from the South to the North and West began when mass immigration came to an abrupt halt at the outbreak of the first world war. Bigotry was no longer a luxury Northern industrialists could afford. Twenty years after Booker T. Washington called on American employers to “cast down your bucket where you are,” industry leaders sent labor scouts south to recruit Black Americans.

Over the course of the war, 1915-19, half a million Black southerners migrated to the industrial belt from New York to Chicago.

Mass immigration resumed after the war, but Black leaders like A. Philip Randolph successfully lobbied to permanently lower immigration to more moderate levels. President Coolidge signed the Immigration Act of 1924 into law and the Great Migration took off. When the Great Migration began, 90 percent of Black Americans were living in the South. By the 1970s, nearly half were in the North and West.

The Great Leveling

In addition to the Great Migration, the moderate levels of immigration over the next four decades contributed to the “Great Leveling,” when America truly became a middle class nation. Between 1940-1980:

The Broken Promise of 1965

Just as civil rights leaders like Booker T. Washington and A. Philip Randolph had believed, Black economic power lead to Black political power. But just as Congress was tearing down barriers to social equality during the Civil Rights Movement, it rebuilt an old barrier to economic equality by restarting mass immigration.

The positive economic trends for Black Americans stalled in the 1970s. Today, after 50 years of the biggest wave of immigration in history, almost all of the gains of the Great Leveling have been lost. By 2018, 42 percent of all Black men (25-34) earned less than the $25,100 necessary to keep a family of four above the poverty line. Inequality – which had plummeted during the low-immigration period – has once again reached the highs of 100 years ago during the Gilded Age.

Inequality_Immigration_Correlation

The Wages of Indifference

The legislators who restarted mass immigration in 1965 claimed that they did so by accident. But since then, multiple Congresses and administrations have ignored the recommendations of every blue-ribbon federal commission to reverse the mistake. Instead, lawmakers have doubled down on mass immigration.

In the 1980s, Congress gutted workplace enforcement provisions from a bill that granted amnesty to illegal workers, and de-facto amnesty to illegal employers.

In the 1990s, Congress responded to what the Department of Labor called an “unprecedented opportunity” for employers to offer better job prospects to Black workers with the largest immigration increase in U.S. history.

In the 2000s, Washington, D.C. drove African-American workers displaced by Hurricane Katrina off the recovery job sites by suspending immigration enforcement.

In the 2010s, the poverty rate for Black Americans was 80% higher than the national average. One out of three Black children lived in poverty while one out of every two Black working-age adults without college degrees were not working. Congress remained indifferent. More permanent work permits were issued to new immigrants in that decade than any other in history.

Immigration numbers: green cards by decade

In the 2020s, illegal immigration has grown to more than twice the level of legal immigration, and Black communities are once again being displaced.

Here’s more about what we do:

We provide civic engagement through education and easy-to-use tools for legislative outreach among grassroots activists and concerned organizational leaders: research, factsheets, live events, speaking engagements, and alliance building. Be a change agent. Actions here!

Back of the Hiring Line book cover

Looking for a book? Pick up Back of the Hiring Line.

Roy Beck tells the 200-year history of immigration surges, employer bias, and depression of Black wealth. Populated with the likes of Frederick Douglass, W.E.B. DuBois, A. Philip Randolph, Barbara Jordan and other African American leaders, the book pulls multiple histories into one place, and saves the receipts.

Andre Barnes, Director of the Hiring Line HBCU Outreach

Looking for a speaker? Contact Andre Barnes, HBCU Engagement Director. Andre’s ongoing relationships with our country’s Historically Black Colleges and Universities ensures we are engaging with tomorrow’s leaders and innovative thinkers.

Ask Andre about what he or other members of the Hiring Line team can bring to your group or event.

Rotunda

Looking for help in your community? NumbersUSA’s Hiring Line team works with local groups to give them a stronger voice in Washington D.C. while further empowering them close to home to achieve a sensible immigration policy.

Every state is a border state. Communities facing the most difficult downstream impacts of an irresponsible policy are frequently among the most disenfranchised, historically and today.