Thematic Analysis Of Sibling Relationships And Autism

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by differences in social communication, restricted interests, and repetitive behaviors.

Many individuals with autism also have intellectual disabilities, which can further impact their cognitive and adaptive functioning.

Autistic individuals may struggle with understanding social cues, maintaining eye contact, and engaging in reciprocal conversations. They might also have sensory sensitivities and prefer structured routines.

These characteristics can affect relationships with family members, peers, and others, potentially leading to misunderstandings or communication breakdowns.

However, with understanding and support, individuals with autism can form meaningful connections and relationships, regardless of their specific challenges or abilities.

Illustration of a brother and sister embracing and smiling together on a yellow backdrop.
Trew, S. (2024). Close relationships despite the challenges: Sibling relationships and autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06412-4

Key Points

  1. The primary findings of this study on sibling relationships in families with autistic adolescents include:
    • Siblings experience a range of aggressive physical and verbal behaviors from their autistic brothers or sisters.
    • Despite challenges, siblings reported getting along with and loving their autistic siblings.
    • Older siblings and some younger siblings expressed concerns about future caregiving responsibilities.
    • Sister siblings often took on caregiving roles, especially for autistic brothers with intellectual disabilities.
    • Siblings reported needing time apart from their autistic siblings to cope with challenging behaviors.
  2. Factors like gender, intellectual disability, and family structure significantly affect sibling relationships and caregiving roles.
  3. The research, while enlightening, has limitations such as a small sample size and lack of diversity in participants’ backgrounds.
  4. Understanding sibling relationships in families with autistic members is crucial for developing effective family interventions and support strategies.

Rationale

Previous research has primarily focused on quantitative measures of sibling relationships in families with autistic members, often from a maternal perspective (Phelps et al., 2009; Smith et al., 2010).

While these studies have provided valuable insights, they lack the depth and nuance that qualitative approaches can offer. This study addresses this gap by exploring the lived experiences of siblings of autistic adolescents, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the complexities in these relationships.

The next step in advancing knowledge in this field is to investigate how autism impacts sibling relationships from the perspective of the siblings themselves, particularly adolescents.

This approach allows for a more holistic understanding of family dynamics and can inform the development of targeted interventions and support strategies.

Method

The study employed a qualitative participatory methodology informed by a phenomenological approach. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with 10 non-autistic siblings of autistic adolescents.

The interviews were semi-structured, focusing on topics such as sibling relationships, interactions, communication, and the positives and challenges of having an autistic sibling.

Data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis (TA), following the guidelines outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006).

This method allowed for the identification, analysis, and presentation of themes derived from the dataset. The researcher employed reflexive practices throughout the research process to mitigate potential bias.

Sample

The study included 10 participants (6 females, 4 males) aged 15-18 years from 10 different families in Canberra, Australian Capital Territory.

All participants had an autistic sibling aged 15-19 years. Eight participants were from two-parent families, and two were from single-parent families.

Results

The study identified several key themes:

1. Getting Along: Maintaining Positive Relationships Despite Challenges

All siblings reported positive aspects of their relationships with autistic siblings, expressing love and care despite challenges. Many described enjoyable interactions and shared activities.

Amandi shared: “Me and my brother, we love each other. We actually get along really well.”

2. Not Just a Sibling but a Carer Too: The Dual Role of Siblings

Nearly half of the participants described taking on caregiving responsibilities, particularly sisters of autistic brothers with intellectual disabilities. This dual role often extended into concerns about future care responsibilities.

Amandi explained: “I automatically shift into a caring role, but not in a bad way. Not like I’m just his carer and not his sister.”

3. Aggression and Frustration: Navigating Challenging Behaviors

Most siblings reported experiencing aggressive physical or verbal behaviors from their autistic siblings. These behaviors often led to frustration and required siblings to develop coping strategies.

Sarah described: “Sometimes my sister, she’s angry, so sometimes I’m scared to say anything to her.”

4. Time Together and Time Apart: Balancing Interaction and Self-Care

Siblings often needed time apart from their autistic siblings to cope with challenging behaviors or avoid conflicts. Many expressed a desire for more peaceful interactions.

Martina explained: “When [my autistic brother] is not in the right headspace it’s hard to talk to him and try to get him in the right headspace. I usually go to my room, so he doesn’t think that I’m a part of it.”

Insight and Depth

This study provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics of sibling relationships in families with autistic adolescents.

It highlights the multifaceted nature of these relationships, which often involve a mix of love, frustration, caregiving, and the need for personal space.

The research also sheds light on the gendered nature of caregiving roles, with sisters often taking on more responsibilities, especially when the autistic sibling is a brother with intellectual disabilities.

Strengths

This study had several methodological strengths, including:

  1. The study employed a qualitative approach, allowing for a deeper understanding of siblings’ experiences.
  2. The use of in-depth interviews provided rich, detailed data.
  3. The study included both male and female siblings, offering insights into potential gender differences.
  4. The research focused on adolescent siblings, an understudied group in this context.
  5. The use of reflexive practices enhanced the study’s rigor and trustworthiness.

Limitations

This study also had several methodological limitations, including:

  1. The small sample size (10 participants) limits the generalizability of the findings.
  2. The study was conducted in a single geographic area (Canberra, Australia), which may not represent experiences in other regions or cultures.
  3. Participants were predominantly from middle to high socioeconomic backgrounds, limiting the diversity of perspectives.
  4. The study relied on self-reported data, which may be subject to bias.
  5. The research did not include the perspectives of the autistic siblings or other family members.

Implications

The findings have significant implications for family practice and support services:

  1. There is a need for interventions that address role conflict and promote role clarity within families.
  2. Support services should be tailored to address the unique challenges faced by sister siblings, particularly those caring for autistic brothers with intellectual disabilities.
  3. Family therapists and practitioners should focus on promoting open family dialogues to achieve a balanced approach to family roles.
  4. Respite services and support groups for siblings could help alleviate the burden of caregiving and provide opportunities for siblings to connect with peers facing similar challenges.
  5. Education and support programs for siblings could help them develop coping strategies and understand their autistic siblings better.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the complex relationships between autistic adolescents and their siblings.

It highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of these relationships, which often involve a mix of love, frustration, caregiving, and the need for personal space.

The findings underscore the importance of developing targeted interventions and support strategies that address the unique challenges faced by siblings, particularly sisters who often take on significant caregiving roles.

Future research should explore these dynamics in more diverse populations and from multiple family members’ perspectives. Additionally, longitudinal studies could provide insights into how these relationships evolve over time.

Understanding and supporting sibling relationships in families with autistic members is crucial for promoting overall family well-being and ensuring that all family members’ needs are met.

References

Primary reference

Trew, S. (2024). Close relationships despite the challenges: Sibling relationships and autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06412-4

Other references

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Phelps, K. W., McCammon, S. L., Wuensch, K. L., & Golden, J. A. (2009). Enrichment, stress, and growth from parenting an individual with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 34(2), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250902845236

Smith, T. (2010). Early and intensive behavioral intervention in autism. In J. R. Weisz & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (pp. 312–326). The Guilford Press.

Keep learning

Suggested Socratic questions for a college class to discuss this paper:

  1. How might the experiences of siblings of autistic individuals differ across various cultural contexts?
  2. In what ways could the gender dynamics observed in caregiving roles reflect broader societal expectations?
  3. How might the relationship dynamics change if we considered the perspectives of the autistic siblings?
  4. What ethical considerations should be taken into account when developing interventions based on these findings?
  5. How might socioeconomic status influence the experiences and roles of siblings in families with autistic members?
  6. What are the potential long-term implications of the caregiving roles adopted by siblings, particularly sisters?
  7. How could the findings of this study inform policy decisions related to support services for families with autistic members?
  8. In what ways might the experiences of siblings in single-parent families differ from those in two-parent families, and why?
  9. How might the age difference between siblings affect their relationship and the non-autistic sibling’s caregiving role?
  10. What strategies could be employed to balance the needs of autistic individuals with those of their siblings within the family unit?
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Saul Mcleod, PhD

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

Saul Mcleod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.


Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

h4 { font-weight: bold; } h1 { font-size: 40px; } h5 { font-weight: bold; } .mv-ad-box * { display: none !important; } .content-unmask .mv-ad-box { display:none; } #printfriendly { line-height: 1.7; } #printfriendly #pf-title { font-size: 40px; }