Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation

Green light | Environment
Why it's so hard to electrify shipping and aviation

Reducing emissions for cargo ships and planes isn’t as simple as sticking a huge battery in them

1 / 13

This is a Honda Civic – a popular car powered by petrol, or gasoline.

It carries about 77.5lb of fuel.

2 / 13

It can travel about 360 miles on one tank of fuel.

3 / 13

This is a Chevrolet Bolt – a car powered by electricity stored in a battery.

If the battery were the same weight as the fuel in the Civic engine ...

4 / 13

… it could only travel 21 miles.

5 / 13

That’s because, pound for pound, fuel provides far more energy than batteries.

This is called “energy density".

6 / 13

Electric cars make up for this low energy density by adding a huge battery and making the car lighter.

Plus, they tend to travel shorter distances on a single charge compared with a full tank of fuel.

7 / 13

Why can’t we do this with ships and planes?

8 / 13

A Boeing 747-300 needs about 120,000lb of conventional jet fuel to travel five hours, though it typically carries more in case it needs to stay in the air longer.

9 / 13

Replacing that energy with a battery would require a battery that is 5.8m pounds – nearly seven times the weight of a fully fueled plane.

10 / 13

The CMA CGM Benjamin Franklin – a vast ship that transports cargo – carries about 33m pounds of fuel.

11 / 13

Replacing that energy with a battery would require a battery that is 1.6bn pounds.

That’s far heavier than the ship can carry.

12 / 13

In short, replacing fuel with a battery just gets too heavy. That’s why decarbonizing ships and planes requires a different kind of innovation.

Read more in our Green light series.

Sources: The Challenge of Decarbonizing Heavy Transport, Brookings Institution; Samantha Gross, Brookings Institution; Simple Flying; Modern Airliners; Honda; Chevrolet; Freight Waves; The Physics Factbook; the-blueprints.com

13 / 13
Loading...