What could Labour mean for investment returns? How Prime Ministers fared since 1970

  • In the past, Labour Governments have delivered better annualised returns
  • Harold Wilson and Jim Callaghan's premierships were the most lucrative

Investors will be pondering what the future holds with Labour now in power.

A delve back into historical data shows that Labour has largely had positive returns when it's in office.

The FTSE 250 rose by as much as 1.7 per cent on Friday morning as the news of the new Government broke although most of the gains were wiped out by the afternoon.

New leader: Keir Starmer has promised change as he replaces Rishi Sunak as the new Prime Minister

New leader: Keir Starmer has promised change as he replaces Rishi Sunak as the new Prime Minister

In the past, Labour governments have delivered market returns of more than double that of the Conservatives, according to analysis by InvestEngine.

That is based on 18 years of Labour government compared to 36 years for the Tories.

Andrew Prosser, head of investments at InvestEngine, said: 'The data shows that a Labour government is more than twice as 'friendly' to UK businesses, with returns of almost 11 per cent compared to just over 5 per cent under the Tories.

'Of the 13 prime ministers we've had since 1970, just four have been Labour versus nine Conservatives, but when it comes to annualised returns, the top two performing prime ministers are Labour.'

Harold Wilson's prime ministerial run from 1974 to 1976 proves the most lucrative in terms of annualised returns, returning 20 per cent per year on average.

Jim Callaghan's premiership meanwhile also saw annualised returns of 20 per cent.

While Margaret Thatcher and John Major delivered returns of 488 per cent and 159 per cent each over the courses of their premierships, these only translate to annualised returns of 17 per cent and 16 per cent respectively.

Similarly, Tony Blair falls into the middle of the pack with annualised returns of just seven per cent, despite overall returns of 92 per cent.

David Cameron saw some success with a nine per cent return whilst in coalition with Nick Clegg, but this dropped to just one per cent during his solo premiership.

The below data is based on the MSCI UK net total return in GBP between June 1970 and July 2024. This measures the performance of large and mid cap segments of the UK market.

How have past Governments impacted investments? 
Prime Minister Years in Office Party Total return over term Annualised return
Harold Wilson 1974-1976 Labour 47% 20%
Jim Callaghan 1976-1979 Labour 74% 20%
Margaret Thatcher 1979-1990 Conservative 488% 17%
John Major 1990-1997 Conservative 159% 16%
Rishi Sunak 2022-2024 Conservative 24% 13%
David Cameron/ Nick Clegg 2010-2015 Conservative/Lib Dem 54% 9%
Theresa May 2016-2019 Conservative 26% 8%
Tony Blair 1997-2007 Labour 92% 7%
Edward Heath 1970-1974 Conservative 26% 6%
Boris Johnson 2019-2022 Conservative 10% 3%
David Cameron 2015-2016 Conservative 1% 1%
Gordon Brown 2007-2010 Labour -9% -3%
Liz Truss 2022-2022 Conservative -4% -25%
Source: InvestEngine

While Gordon Brown's premiership delivered the worst total return, at negative nine per cent, this translates to a negative annualised return of three per cent. 

Liz Truss, meanwhile, while having a better total return over her term, her short stay in Downing Street means that in annual terms her premiership saw a 25 per cent negative return.

'It is perhaps no surprise that bringing up the rear, with annualised returns of negative 25 per cent, is Liz Truss during her historically short 50-day premiership,' Prosser said.

What does this mean for Keir Starmer's premiership?

Given the length of time they have spent in power, the Conservatives would have delivered better return cumulatively, InvestEngine said. 

As a result, it said prioritising a buy-and-hold strategy is the most effective way of growing wealth, instead of being swayed by political changes.

'Despite the fact that annualised returns under the Conservatives are lower, £100 would have grown to £4,902 under Tory governments but only £447 under Labour, simply because they have been in power for longer,' Prosser said. 

'However, if investors had held that £100 through all political regimes, the same £100 would be worth £21,893 today.'

'For any investor, the biggest asset you can have is time; the longer your cash is invested, the more time it has to grow. Time in the market also gives portfolios the chance to benefit from the wonders of compounding interest,' he said.

Given the initial positive reaction from the markets, investors are likely going to be holding onto the hope that history will repeat itself.

Compare the best DIY investing platforms and stocks & shares Isas

Investing online is simple, cheap and can be done from your computer, tablet or phone at a time and place that suits you.

When it comes to choosing a DIY investing platform, stocks & shares Isa or a general investing account, the range of options might seem overwhelming. 

Every provider has a slightly different offering, charging more or less for trading or holding shares and giving access to a different range of stocks, funds and investment trusts. 

When weighing up the right one for you, it's important to to look at the service that it offers, along with administration charges and dealing fees, plus any other extra costs.

To help you compare the best investment accounts, we've crunched the facts and pulled together a comprehensive guide to choosing the best and cheapest investing account for you. 

We highlight the main players in the table below but would advise doing your own research and considering the points in our full guide linked here.

>> This is Money's full guide to the best investing platforms and Isas 

Platforms featured below are independently selected by This is Money’s specialist journalists. If you open an account using links which have an asterisk, This is Money will earn an affiliate commission. We do not allow this to affect our editorial independence. 

DIY INVESTING PLATFORMS AND STOCKS & SHARES ISAS 
Admin charge Charges notes Fund dealing Standard share, trust, ETF dealing Regular investing Dividend reinvestment
AJ Bell*  0.25%  Max £3.50 per month for shares, trusts, ETFs.  £1.50 £5  £1.50 £1.50 per deal  More details
Bestinvest* 0.40% (0.2% for ready made portfolios) Account fee cut to 0.2% for ready made investments Free £4.95 Free for funds  Free for income funds More details
Charles Stanley Direct* 0.35%  No platform fee on shares if a trade in that month and annual max of £240 Free £11.50 n/a n/a More details
Fidelity* 0.35% on funds £7.50 per month up to £25,000 or 0.35% with regular savings plan.  Free £7.50 Free funds £1.50 shares, trusts ETFs £1.50 More details
Hargreaves Lansdown* 0.45% Capped at £45 for shares, trusts, ETFs Free £11.95 £1.50 1% (£1 min, £10 max) More details
Interactive Investor*  £4.99 per month under £50k, £11.99 above, £10 extra for Sipp Free trade worth £3.99 per month (does not apply to £4.99 plan) £3.99 £3.99 Free £0.99 More details
iWeb £100 one-off fee (waived until July 2024) £5 £5 n/a 2%, max £5 More details
 Accounts that have some limits but attractive offers  
Etoro*  No investment funds or SippFree Investment account offers stocks and ETFs. Beware high risk CFDs.Not available Free n/a n/a More details 
Trading 212* Free Investment account offers stocks and ETFs. Beware high risk CFDs. Not available Free n/a Free More details 
Freetrade* No investment funds Basic account free,  Standard with Isa £4.99, Plus £9.99Freetrade Plus with more investments and Sipp is £9.99/month inc. Isa feeNo funds Free n/a n/a More details 
Vanguard  Only Vanguard's own products0.15% Only Vanguard fundsFree Free only Vanguard ETFs Free n/a More details 
(Source: ThisisMoney.co.uk May 2024. Admin % charge may be levied monthly or quarterly