Filibuster
'The public business must go forward': Why the Founders would have hated filibusters.
Lifetime Supreme Court appointments require only 51 votes. Why insist on 60 for laws that can be changed any time? Senators should get over themselves.
Andrew Trees
Opinion contributor
The Senate filibuster is an accident of history that deserves our contempt, not our protection.
The filibuster emerged as an unintended byproduct of a rule change in 1806. At the Constitutional Convention, the founders certainly never imagined requiring a supermajority of 60 votes to pass legislation. One of the chief defects of the Articles of Confederation, according to critics at the time, was precisely the requirement of a supermajority to enact anything of significance.