Race and Ethnicity
'Critical race theory' divides. Maybe that's the point? U.S. race history isn’t a theory.
Opinion: 'Critical race theory' means whatever supporters or critics say it does, which keeps us divided on history and race. It doesn't have to be this way.
![Portrait of Greg Moore](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.usatoday.com/gcdn/-mm-/edc91bfe53ef916d6606a8645badea0f68dfd2e9/c=281-0-2378-2097/local/-/media/2017/10/16/Phoenix/Phoenix/636437583625588468-newsroom-portraits-157.jpg?width=48&height=48&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp)
Arizona Republic
We’re never going to get anywhere if we’re arguing about words and semantics instead of ideas and goals – and maybe that’s the point?
The Arizona Supreme Court struck down a portion of the state budget signed by Gov. Doug Ducey over the summer that banned the teaching of “critical race theory” in K-12 schools.
That won’t be the end of the discussion. About two dozen other states are in the throes of a similar fight with legislation and court decisions setting up a patchwork of laws that would be destined to end up in front of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Fine. But this could all be solved with some compassion and kindness.