Talk:HTML5

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Timhowardriley in topic Was the recommendation retired?

NPOV dispute

edit

The section "Distinction between W3C's HTML5 and WHATWG's HTML" contains personal names and looks very aggressive. Please, refactor it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1458:204:1:0:0:101:E1AC (talk) 12:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Is the "Cleanup" to-do done?

edit

The to-do list above includes "Cleanup : Distinction between W3C's HTML5 and WHATWG's HTML". Has this item been accomplished by the addition of the table in the new section Differences between the two standards? Ennex2 (talk) 01:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

I have now removed that item from the to-do list. Ennex2 (talk) 00:25, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Ennex2: Thanks. I did much of that cleanup job, but wasn't aware of the to-do list.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  11:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

I've put a similar TODO back up. This article seems confused about whether it's topic is HTML5 or the HTML living standard.Metaquanta (talk) 07:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Confusing first sentence

edit

"HTML5 is a software solution stack that defines the properties and behaviors of web page content by implementing a markup based pattern to it."

So we have a stack implementing a pattern to content, thereby defining properties and behaviors of content.

I am mystified. Surely this can be stated more clearly, perhaps without the buzzy word "solution". -- FIPAR (talk) 21:25, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

It's really bad and didn't use to be. You should find the most recent clearer version and put it back. Metaquanta (talk) 07:31, 25 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Done. Restored the version that preceded this:[1]. Metaquanta (talk) 05:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Was the recommendation retired?

edit

This sentence says the recommendation was retired: "The W3C recommendation of HTML5 was retired[.]" Was the recommendation retired or was HTML5 retired? Timhowardriley (talk) 16:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply