User contributions for JoaquimCebuano
Appearance
A user with 715 edits. Account created on 2 May 2021.
11 August 2024
- 00:3100:31, 11 August 2024 diff hist +290 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TESCREAL (2nd nomination) →TESCREAL: Reply Tag: Reply
10 August 2024
- 16:3516:35, 10 August 2024 diff hist +612 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TESCREAL (2nd nomination) →TESCREAL: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:2216:22, 10 August 2024 diff hist +4,086 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Existential risk studies: new section
- 15:5515:55, 10 August 2024 diff hist +52 Existential risk studies No edit summary current
- 15:4815:48, 10 August 2024 diff hist +939 Talk:Existential risk studies →Proposing move to draft: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:4602:46, 10 August 2024 diff hist +105 Existential risk studies No edit summary
9 August 2024
- 21:4321:43, 9 August 2024 diff hist +41 Robert A. Heinlein I doubt that Mises.org is a reliable source for determining the politics of someone, partisan foundations have the intrinsic tendency to recruit whoever legitimizes their project
- 20:5920:59, 9 August 2024 diff hist +24 Existential risk studies No edit summary
- 16:4816:48, 9 August 2024 diff hist +30 N Vasily Nikolaevich Chekrygin ←Redirected page to Vasily Chekrygin current Tags: New redirect Uncategorized redirect
- 13:5113:51, 9 August 2024 diff hist +1,184 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TESCREAL (2nd nomination) →TESCREAL: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:4113:41, 9 August 2024 diff hist +2,044 Talk:Existential risk studies →What?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:3613:36, 9 August 2024 diff hist −17 Existential risk studies Undid revision 1239463145 by WeyerStudentOfAgrippa (talk) Edit against the sources to force POV Tag: Undo
- 04:5604:56, 9 August 2024 diff hist +40 Russian philosophy No edit summary current
- 01:0701:07, 9 August 2024 diff hist +38 Party for Socialism and Liberation Undid revision 1239391776 by Internacio (talk) The previous formulation was cleaner Tag: Undo
- 01:0501:05, 9 August 2024 diff hist −3 Party for Socialism and Liberation Undid revision 1239391897 by Internacio (talk) Inversion of truth - evidences points to the reality of the massacre, anyone who 'disagrees' with it is denying, not stating an alternative possibility Tag: Undo
8 August 2024
- 23:2223:22, 8 August 2024 diff hist +186 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TESCREAL (2nd nomination) →TESCREAL: Reply Tag: Reply
- 23:2023:20, 8 August 2024 diff hist +598 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TESCREAL (2nd nomination) No edit summary
- 23:1023:10, 8 August 2024 diff hist +405 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TESCREAL (2nd nomination) →TESCREAL: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:4616:46, 8 August 2024 diff hist +1 m Talk:Existential risk studies No edit summary
- 16:0816:08, 8 August 2024 diff hist +513 Talk:Existential risk studies →What?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 05:2005:20, 8 August 2024 diff hist +4 Anti-aging movement Wording current
- 05:1605:16, 8 August 2024 diff hist +53 Life extension →History: Including the previous paragraph in the contemporary subsection, nevertheless this paragraph seems completely without context current
- 05:1405:14, 8 August 2024 diff hist +9 Life extension Reorganizing sections - Dividing history into a new contemporary subsection, merging genetic editing in research, making ethics and politics an independent section, moving mind uploading to the end (not sure what do to with it)
- 02:4902:49, 8 August 2024 diff hist +75 m Existential risk studies No edit summary
- 02:4702:47, 8 August 2024 diff hist +63 m Existential risk studies No edit summary
- 02:4402:44, 8 August 2024 diff hist −4 m Existential risk studies No edit summary
- 02:4102:41, 8 August 2024 diff hist −676 Existential risk studies →Bibliography Tag: harv-error
- 00:5100:51, 8 August 2024 diff hist −621 TESCREAL Repairing code
- 00:4800:48, 8 August 2024 diff hist +430 TESCREAL New source
7 August 2024
- 23:5523:55, 7 August 2024 diff hist +173 Talk:Utilitarianism →Edit war: Reply Tag: Reply
- 23:5423:54, 7 August 2024 diff hist +325 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Using Wikipedia as a source in Utilitarianism: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:5616:56, 7 August 2024 diff hist +381 User talk:Zopyr No edit summary
- 16:5616:56, 7 August 2024 diff hist +261 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Using Wikipedia as a source in Utilitarianism: new section
- 16:3316:33, 7 August 2024 diff hist −99 m Utilitarianism Reverted 1 edit by Zopyr (talk) to last revision by JoaquimCebuano Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
- 16:2016:20, 7 August 2024 diff hist −99 Utilitarianism Undid revision 1239148747 by Zopyr (talk) Wikipedia is not a reliable source Tags: Undo Reverted
- 16:1916:19, 7 August 2024 diff hist 0 m Talk:Existential risk studies No edit summary
- 16:1416:14, 7 August 2024 diff hist +3 m Talk:Existential risk studies No edit summary
- 16:1316:13, 7 August 2024 diff hist +1,313 Talk:Existential risk studies →What?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:0214:02, 7 August 2024 diff hist +260 Talk:Existential risk studies →What?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:3802:38, 7 August 2024 diff hist +669 Talk:TESCREAL →Neutrality: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:0200:02, 7 August 2024 diff hist +6 Afrophone philosophy No edit summary current
- 00:0100:01, 7 August 2024 diff hist +17 m Monkey menace →In philosophy current
- 00:0000:00, 7 August 2024 diff hist +2 m Monkey menace No edit summary
6 August 2024
- 20:2120:21, 6 August 2024 diff hist +42 Bernard Le Bovier de Fontenelle →Legacy current
- 19:5419:54, 6 August 2024 diff hist +8 Template:Futures studies Changing redirection for the article title current
- 19:2619:26, 6 August 2024 diff hist +26 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering →Active current
- 19:2019:20, 6 August 2024 diff hist +362 Talk:Existential risk studies →What?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:1819:18, 6 August 2024 diff hist +5,049 Talk:Existential risk studies →What?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:0316:03, 6 August 2024 diff hist +553 Template talk:Humanities →"Antihumanism (Philistinism)": new section current Tag: New topic
5 August 2024
- 13:4913:49, 5 August 2024 diff hist +352 Talk:Existential risk studies →What?: Reply Tag: Reply