Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Davis (web designer)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Joshua Davis (web designer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nomination. Prod contested in 2008 and again in 2011 (by Falcon8765). Nominator's rationale was: Non-notable person. Joshua Davis has one noted award and will have had installations at a few places, not 'several' enough to be notable. There are hundreds of thousands of people who are so-called pioneers of the web. Joshua Davis has certainly been a part of many teams who have moved the web along, but really nothing of notibility on his own accord. Pnm (talk) 20:29, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep work has been featured in major galleries and won a major award. Falcon8765 (TALK) 01:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.