Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

HSMF enhancements #167

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

HSMF enhancements #167

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dhoelzl
Copy link

@dhoelzl dhoelzl commented Feb 20, 2020

  • introduce NameIdChunks.GetPropertyTag which enables evaluating property ids from properties identified by name/id in property sets
    (simple version of IMAPIProp::GetIDsFromNames)
  • AttachmentChunks.getAttachData: use new ByteStreamChunk instead of ByteChunk which enables delayed reading of attachments
    to avoid all attachments are completely read into memory when parsing which may cause OutOfMemoryErrors on e-mails with big attachments.
  • POIFSChunkParser: support reading multi valued chunks (e.g. required when reading the Keywords ("categories") property)
  • add MAPIProperty.RECEIVED_BY_SMTP_ADDRESS
  • add unit tests
@dhoelzl
HSMF enhancements
3e63900 
- introduce NameIdChunks.GetPropertyTag which enables evaluating property ids from properties identified by name/id in property sets
  (simple version of IMAPIProp::GetIDsFromNames)
- AttachmentChunks.getAttachData: use new ByteStreamChunk instead of ByteChunk which enables delayed reading of attachments
  to avoid all attachments are completely read into memory when parsing which may cause OutOfMemoryErrors on e-mails with big attachments.
- POIFSChunkParser: support reading multi valued chunks (e.g. required when reading the Keywords ("categories") property)
- add MAPIProperty.RECEIVED_BY_SMTP_ADDRESS
- add unit tests
@dhoelzl
Copy link
Author

dhoelzl commented Mar 9, 2020

Thank you for applying this!
@dhoelzl dhoelzl closed this Mar 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
1 participant
@dhoelzl