Private Prisons How They Are Profiting Under the Trump Administration
By Hauwa Ahmed,
AmericanProgress.org
Getty/Jessey Dearing/The Boston Globe
There are more people behind bars in the United States than there are living in major American cities such as Phoenix or Philadelphia. According to a 2018 report from the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, nearly 2 million adults were being held in America’s prisons and jails. Of these 2 million prisoners, about 128,063 were detained in federal or state facilities operated by private prison facilities, a 47 percent increase from the 87,369 prisoners in 2000.
In 2016, the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) inspector general initiated a review to examine conditions at a number of for-profit prisons that the federal government contracted with from fiscal year 2011 through fiscal year 2014. A report on the findings indicated that private prisons had a 28 percent higher rate of inmate-on-inmate assaults and more than twice as many inmate-on-staff assaults compared with federally run or operated prisons. Furthermore, the report found that for-profit prisons in the United States were more likely to endanger inmates’ security and rights. These problems were so significant that in August 2016, the Obama administration announced that it would begin to phase out private prisons.
As the number of incarcerated individuals in for-profit prisons grew, so did the number of immigrants detained in such facilities. According to a report by the Sentencing Project, about 4,841 immigrants were detained in for-profit facilities in 2000. By 2016, that number had soared to 26,249 immigrants—a 442 percent increase. In the wake of the DOJ’s decision to phase out the use of for-profit prisons, the Homeland Security Advisory Council reviewed the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) use of private immigration detention facilities. Immediately after this review was announced, the stock prices of private prison company giants CoreCivic—formerly the Corrections Corporation of America—and the GEO Group Inc. dropped by 9.4 percent and 6 percent, respective. A majority of the council agreed with the view that DHS should begin to move away from using private prison facilities but recommended that while they were still in use, they “should come with improved and expanded (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) oversight.”
Following the inauguration of President Donald Trump in January 2017, however, the administration immediately shifted course to robustly support private prisons. In February of that year, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions revoked the Obama administration’s initiative, and by April 2017, the DOJ began requesting bids for contracts to house federal inmates in private prison facilities once again. That same month, the GEO Group won a $110 million contract to build the first detention center under the new administration.
The fact that private prisons have serious, documented flaws raises questions as to why the Trump administration is so eager to support them. It is noteworthy that a pro-Trump PAC and the president’s inaugural committee have benefited from the private prison industry’s financial contributions. The Trump family business has benefited from the industry’s patronage as well.
This issue brief details how Trump administration policies have increased the migrant detainee population—and the profits of private prisons—as well as endangered the lives of migrants being held in detention. The brief then illustrates just how much money private prisons have spent in U.S. political campaigns.
Trump administration policies have increased the number of migrants in detention
The Trump administration has implemented policies that have increased the number of migrants in detention. In early 2017, President Trump signed an executive order titled “Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States,” which instituted a massive expansion of immigration enforcement within the United States. It defined enforcement priorities so broadly that all undocumented individuals became subject to deportation orders, regardless of how long they had been in the country. The order represented a radical departure from the Obama administration’s approach, which prioritized the removal of migrants who had been found guilty of crimes. The executive order also directed state and local police to enforce federal immigration laws.
Similarly, in April 2019, current Attorney General William Barr rescinded a decision that enabled eligible asylum-seekers to request bond from immigration judges. This decision effectively instituted indefinite detention due to the fact that some migrants will now be held in detention for months or years before their cases are adjudicated. Moreover, in July 2019, DHS increased its application of expedited removal, a fast-track summary process for deporting noncitizens without a hearing from an immigration judge.
Last week, the Trump administration issued a final rule in a legally questionable attempt to make changes to the 1997 Flores agreement, a long-standing legal agreement specifying basic standards of care for minors in detention. As interpreted, this agreement requires that minors not be held in unlicensed secure detention facilities for more than 20 days. If implemented, the administration’s changes would effectively cause undocumented children and their families to be detained in inadequate, unlicensed facilities indefinitely. According to the president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, “no child should be placed in detention … even short periods of detention can cause psychological trauma and long-term mental health risks.”
As expected, the Trump administration’s hard-line immigration policies have led to a record-high number of immigrant detainees. Currently, there are about 54,344 immigrants detained in about 200 detention centers across the country. In 2017, the last time ICE produced such data, more than three-fourths of the average daily detainee population was being held in a for-profit detention facility. CoreCivic and the GEO Group are recipients of more than one-half of private prison industry contracts. These companies manage the detention of immigrants seeking asylum, those awaiting hearings in immigration courts, and those who have been identified for removal. For every 100 immigrant detainees, 32 are in GEO Group facilities, and 21 are in CoreCivic facilities.
A record number of immigrants have died in detention. Since 2017, 27 immigrants have died in ICE custody, including a transgender woman named Roxsana Hernandez. Johana Medina Leon, also a transgender woman, died shortly after being released from custody. Of these 27 immigrants, 21 have died in facilities that are owned or operated by for-profit prison companies. In June 2019, the government’s own investigators determined that conditions in major private prison facilities were “unsafe and unhealthy” and violated ICE’s own standards. Despite these failures, the industry is benefiting enormously. Trump administration policies around enforcement priorities and detention practices have led to an increase in the demand for detention space, which has resulted in record-high profits for private detention facilities.
Under the Trump administration, ICE has significantly increased its enforcement operations, which has directly contributed to the rise in the migrant detainee population. In order to achieve this, ICE has consistently exceeded its budget. According to reporting from Buzzfeed News, there were 52,398 people in ICE custody in May 2019. Congress provided funds for ICE to maintain an average of 45,000 people in detention per day in the latest budget, but with about 54,344 migrants in detention currently, the agency is overspending these funds by more than 15 percent. DHS has also increasingly begun diverting funds that had been earmarked for other agency operations to ICE in order to fund enforcement and detention operations. According to a Roll Call report, DHS intends to divert more than $200 million from other programs—including disaster relief programs—to fund immigration detention. This is the fourth consecutive fiscal year in which DHS has repurposed funds meant for other agency operations toward immigration enforcement.
Significantly increasing the number of immigrants in detention means record-high profits for private prisons
During his 2016 campaign, then-candidate Trump expressed support for expanding the role of private prisons and espoused hard-line immigration policies. The morning after his election, stocks in CoreCivic increased by 34 percent, and those in the GEO Group rose by 18 percent. The two companies have informed their shareholders that federal government contracts are integral to their profitability. In memos to their shareholders, both companies acknowledge that policies with the potential to reduce the U.S. detainee population constitute potential risk factors to their business model.
Table 1 indicates the extent to which both CoreCivic and the GEO Group are dependent on three government agencies—ICE, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, and the U.S. Marshals Service—for their business.
In light of the fact that both CoreCivic and the GEO Group have depended on just three agencies charged with enforcement and detention operations for an average of about 48 percent of their revenues over the past two years, these two companies have a vested interest in the Trump administration’s punitive immigration policies to ensure that they remain profitable.
Conditions in private detention facilities endanger immigrants’ lives
In FY 2018, DHS received $3 billion for custody operations. At least 75 percent of the detention facilities for which DHS contracts are privately owned or operated. Despite this level of funding, conditions at these detention centers remain dangerous, and detainees’ rights are routinely violated. A 2019 Office of Inspector General (OIG) report on an investigation of ICE oversight of its contracted detention facilities indicates that the agency routinely waives its own standards, including those meant to ensure the health and safety of detainees. Additionally, ICE often fails to include its quality assurance surveillance plan (QASP)—a key tool for ensuring that facilities meet ICE’s performance standards—in facility contracts and rarely imposes financial consequences for facilities that are noncompliant.
According to the OIG report, only 28 out of the 106 contracts reviewed contained a QASP. The report also stated that between October 1, 2015, and June 30, 2018, ICE imposed financial penalties on only two occasions despite documenting thousands of instances in which facilities failed to comply with detention standards. The OIG also investigated three GEO Group facilities and found “egregious violations of detention standards.” All three facilities were found to have expired food, putting detainees’ health at risk. The GEO Group-operated Aurora, Colorado, facility failed to provide recreation and outdoor activities to detainees. At another GEO Group-operated facility in Adelanto, California, the OIG identified detainee bathrooms that “were in poor condition, including mold and peeling paint on the walls, floors, and showers, and unusable toilets.” All of these infractions violate ICE’s standards.
According to a 2018 letter from the Office of Rep. Kathleen Rice (D-NY) to DHS, “Of the 298 transgender people ICE detained in FY 2017, 13% were placed in solitary confinement.” This not only has adverse effects on detainees’ mental health and well-being but is also against ICE’s rules. While there is existing Obama-era guidance on how to provide care for transgender migrants in ICE custody, the guidance is not mandatory. Due to ICE’s negligence, LGBTQ+ immigrants continue to face a higher risk of sexual violence than the general population. And as for-profit prisons continue to play an outsize role in immigration detention while providing substandard care, the health and safety of vulnerable populations such as LGBTQ+ migrants remain especially at risk.
Private prison companies are major players in political spending
Although private prisons have been ineffective at providing high-quality detention services, they have been effective at supporting political allies. In the 2016 presidential election, for example, the GEO Group and CoreCivic donated $250,000 each to President Trump’s inaugural committee. In 2017, the GEO Group moved its annual conference to a Trump-owned resort in Boca Raton, Florida. Additionally, the GEO Group contributed heavily to the campaigns of some members of the U.S. House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, the congressional subcommittee charged with funding DHS.
These companies and their employees also contribute to congressional candidates, donating overwhelmingly to those running as Republicans. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, CoreCivic and its employees have spent about $3 million on campaign contributions to federal candidates and PACs since 1990. Eighty-five percent of CoreCivic’s contributions to federal candidates since 1990 have gone to Republicans, while 13 percent of its contributions have gone to Democrats. Additionally, CoreCivic has spent $26.1 million on lobbying since 1998. The GEO Group and its employees have donated about $4.4 million to federal candidates and PACs since 2004. Since that year, 54 percent of the GEO Group’s campaign contributions went to Republican candidates, while 15 percent went to Democratic candidates.
Conclusion
The Trump administration’s immigration policies as well as existing immigration legislation create structural incentives to increase detention, which has largely been achieved through the use of private prisons. This increased role drives these companies’ profitability while endangering the lives of immigrants through inadequate care and a lack of accountability. Special interests should not profit from immigration enforcement. Congress and the administration should hold private detention facilities that violate ICE’S standards accountable.
Getty/Jessey Dearing/The Boston Globe
There are more people behind bars in the United States than there are living in major American cities such as Phoenix or Philadelphia. According to a 2018 report from the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, nearly 2 million adults were being held in America’s prisons and jails. Of these 2 million prisoners, about 128,063 were detained in federal or state facilities operated by private prison facilities, a 47 percent increase from the 87,369 prisoners in 2000.
In 2016, the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) inspector general initiated a review to examine conditions at a number of for-profit prisons that the federal government contracted with from fiscal year 2011 through fiscal year 2014. A report on the findings indicated that private prisons had a 28 percent higher rate of inmate-on-inmate assaults and more than twice as many inmate-on-staff assaults compared with federally run or operated prisons. Furthermore, the report found that for-profit prisons in the United States were more likely to endanger inmates’ security and rights. These problems were so significant that in August 2016, the Obama administration announced that it would begin to phase out private prisons.
As the number of incarcerated individuals in for-profit prisons grew, so did the number of immigrants detained in such facilities. According to a report by the Sentencing Project, about 4,841 immigrants were detained in for-profit facilities in 2000. By 2016, that number had soared to 26,249 immigrants—a 442 percent increase. In the wake of the DOJ’s decision to phase out the use of for-profit prisons, the Homeland Security Advisory Council reviewed the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) use of private immigration detention facilities. Immediately after this review was announced, the stock prices of private prison company giants CoreCivic—formerly the Corrections Corporation of America—and the GEO Group Inc. dropped by 9.4 percent and 6 percent, respective. A majority of the council agreed with the view that DHS should begin to move away from using private prison facilities but recommended that while they were still in use, they “should come with improved and expanded (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) oversight.”
Following the inauguration of President Donald Trump in January 2017, however, the administration immediately shifted course to robustly support private prisons. In February of that year, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions revoked the Obama administration’s initiative, and by April 2017, the DOJ began requesting bids for contracts to house federal inmates in private prison facilities once again. That same month, the GEO Group won a $110 million contract to build the first detention center under the new administration.
The fact that private prisons have serious, documented flaws raises questions as to why the Trump administration is so eager to support them. It is noteworthy that a pro-Trump PAC and the president’s inaugural committee have benefited from the private prison industry’s financial contributions. The Trump family business has benefited from the industry’s patronage as well.
This issue brief details how Trump administration policies have increased the migrant detainee population—and the profits of private prisons—as well as endangered the lives of migrants being held in detention. The brief then illustrates just how much money private prisons have spent in U.S. political campaigns.
Trump administration policies have increased the number of migrants in detention
The Trump administration has implemented policies that have increased the number of migrants in detention. In early 2017, President Trump signed an executive order titled “Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States,” which instituted a massive expansion of immigration enforcement within the United States. It defined enforcement priorities so broadly that all undocumented individuals became subject to deportation orders, regardless of how long they had been in the country. The order represented a radical departure from the Obama administration’s approach, which prioritized the removal of migrants who had been found guilty of crimes. The executive order also directed state and local police to enforce federal immigration laws.
Similarly, in April 2019, current Attorney General William Barr rescinded a decision that enabled eligible asylum-seekers to request bond from immigration judges. This decision effectively instituted indefinite detention due to the fact that some migrants will now be held in detention for months or years before their cases are adjudicated. Moreover, in July 2019, DHS increased its application of expedited removal, a fast-track summary process for deporting noncitizens without a hearing from an immigration judge.
Last week, the Trump administration issued a final rule in a legally questionable attempt to make changes to the 1997 Flores agreement, a long-standing legal agreement specifying basic standards of care for minors in detention. As interpreted, this agreement requires that minors not be held in unlicensed secure detention facilities for more than 20 days. If implemented, the administration’s changes would effectively cause undocumented children and their families to be detained in inadequate, unlicensed facilities indefinitely. According to the president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, “no child should be placed in detention … even short periods of detention can cause psychological trauma and long-term mental health risks.”
As expected, the Trump administration’s hard-line immigration policies have led to a record-high number of immigrant detainees. Currently, there are about 54,344 immigrants detained in about 200 detention centers across the country. In 2017, the last time ICE produced such data, more than three-fourths of the average daily detainee population was being held in a for-profit detention facility. CoreCivic and the GEO Group are recipients of more than one-half of private prison industry contracts. These companies manage the detention of immigrants seeking asylum, those awaiting hearings in immigration courts, and those who have been identified for removal. For every 100 immigrant detainees, 32 are in GEO Group facilities, and 21 are in CoreCivic facilities.
A record number of immigrants have died in detention. Since 2017, 27 immigrants have died in ICE custody, including a transgender woman named Roxsana Hernandez. Johana Medina Leon, also a transgender woman, died shortly after being released from custody. Of these 27 immigrants, 21 have died in facilities that are owned or operated by for-profit prison companies. In June 2019, the government’s own investigators determined that conditions in major private prison facilities were “unsafe and unhealthy” and violated ICE’s own standards. Despite these failures, the industry is benefiting enormously. Trump administration policies around enforcement priorities and detention practices have led to an increase in the demand for detention space, which has resulted in record-high profits for private detention facilities.
Under the Trump administration, ICE has significantly increased its enforcement operations, which has directly contributed to the rise in the migrant detainee population. In order to achieve this, ICE has consistently exceeded its budget. According to reporting from Buzzfeed News, there were 52,398 people in ICE custody in May 2019. Congress provided funds for ICE to maintain an average of 45,000 people in detention per day in the latest budget, but with about 54,344 migrants in detention currently, the agency is overspending these funds by more than 15 percent. DHS has also increasingly begun diverting funds that had been earmarked for other agency operations to ICE in order to fund enforcement and detention operations. According to a Roll Call report, DHS intends to divert more than $200 million from other programs—including disaster relief programs—to fund immigration detention. This is the fourth consecutive fiscal year in which DHS has repurposed funds meant for other agency operations toward immigration enforcement.
Significantly increasing the number of immigrants in detention means record-high profits for private prisons
During his 2016 campaign, then-candidate Trump expressed support for expanding the role of private prisons and espoused hard-line immigration policies. The morning after his election, stocks in CoreCivic increased by 34 percent, and those in the GEO Group rose by 18 percent. The two companies have informed their shareholders that federal government contracts are integral to their profitability. In memos to their shareholders, both companies acknowledge that policies with the potential to reduce the U.S. detainee population constitute potential risk factors to their business model.
Table 1 indicates the extent to which both CoreCivic and the GEO Group are dependent on three government agencies—ICE, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, and the U.S. Marshals Service—for their business.
In light of the fact that both CoreCivic and the GEO Group have depended on just three agencies charged with enforcement and detention operations for an average of about 48 percent of their revenues over the past two years, these two companies have a vested interest in the Trump administration’s punitive immigration policies to ensure that they remain profitable.
Conditions in private detention facilities endanger immigrants’ lives
In FY 2018, DHS received $3 billion for custody operations. At least 75 percent of the detention facilities for which DHS contracts are privately owned or operated. Despite this level of funding, conditions at these detention centers remain dangerous, and detainees’ rights are routinely violated. A 2019 Office of Inspector General (OIG) report on an investigation of ICE oversight of its contracted detention facilities indicates that the agency routinely waives its own standards, including those meant to ensure the health and safety of detainees. Additionally, ICE often fails to include its quality assurance surveillance plan (QASP)—a key tool for ensuring that facilities meet ICE’s performance standards—in facility contracts and rarely imposes financial consequences for facilities that are noncompliant.
According to the OIG report, only 28 out of the 106 contracts reviewed contained a QASP. The report also stated that between October 1, 2015, and June 30, 2018, ICE imposed financial penalties on only two occasions despite documenting thousands of instances in which facilities failed to comply with detention standards. The OIG also investigated three GEO Group facilities and found “egregious violations of detention standards.” All three facilities were found to have expired food, putting detainees’ health at risk. The GEO Group-operated Aurora, Colorado, facility failed to provide recreation and outdoor activities to detainees. At another GEO Group-operated facility in Adelanto, California, the OIG identified detainee bathrooms that “were in poor condition, including mold and peeling paint on the walls, floors, and showers, and unusable toilets.” All of these infractions violate ICE’s standards.
According to a 2018 letter from the Office of Rep. Kathleen Rice (D-NY) to DHS, “Of the 298 transgender people ICE detained in FY 2017, 13% were placed in solitary confinement.” This not only has adverse effects on detainees’ mental health and well-being but is also against ICE’s rules. While there is existing Obama-era guidance on how to provide care for transgender migrants in ICE custody, the guidance is not mandatory. Due to ICE’s negligence, LGBTQ+ immigrants continue to face a higher risk of sexual violence than the general population. And as for-profit prisons continue to play an outsize role in immigration detention while providing substandard care, the health and safety of vulnerable populations such as LGBTQ+ migrants remain especially at risk.
Private prison companies are major players in political spending
Although private prisons have been ineffective at providing high-quality detention services, they have been effective at supporting political allies. In the 2016 presidential election, for example, the GEO Group and CoreCivic donated $250,000 each to President Trump’s inaugural committee. In 2017, the GEO Group moved its annual conference to a Trump-owned resort in Boca Raton, Florida. Additionally, the GEO Group contributed heavily to the campaigns of some members of the U.S. House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, the congressional subcommittee charged with funding DHS.
These companies and their employees also contribute to congressional candidates, donating overwhelmingly to those running as Republicans. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, CoreCivic and its employees have spent about $3 million on campaign contributions to federal candidates and PACs since 1990. Eighty-five percent of CoreCivic’s contributions to federal candidates since 1990 have gone to Republicans, while 13 percent of its contributions have gone to Democrats. Additionally, CoreCivic has spent $26.1 million on lobbying since 1998. The GEO Group and its employees have donated about $4.4 million to federal candidates and PACs since 2004. Since that year, 54 percent of the GEO Group’s campaign contributions went to Republican candidates, while 15 percent went to Democratic candidates.
Conclusion
The Trump administration’s immigration policies as well as existing immigration legislation create structural incentives to increase detention, which has largely been achieved through the use of private prisons. This increased role drives these companies’ profitability while endangering the lives of immigrants through inadequate care and a lack of accountability. Special interests should not profit from immigration enforcement. Congress and the administration should hold private detention facilities that violate ICE’S standards accountable.
Lt. Bob Kroll, the president of the Minneapolis Police Union, discussing the release of body camera footage in the shooting death of Thurman Blevins in 2018. Credit...Elizabeth Flores/Star Tribune, via Associated Press
Kim Gardner, a reform-minded prosecutor in St. Louis, said police union objections have blocked her proposal for a unit that would investigate police misconduct independently of the department. Credit...Christopher Smith for The New York Times
U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders speaking with supporters at a campaign rally in Des Moines, Iowa. (Photo: Gage Skidmore, courtesy of Flickr)
Sanders supporter Nitiki Satterwhite, a 43-year-old mother and risk manager who lives in Columbia, said she supports Sanders in part because of his stance on free public college.
Sophie Vaughan is a freelance writer traveling to and reporting from hot spots of the 2020 election.
Satsuki Kanno lives across the bay from a coal-burning power plant under construction in Yokosuka, Japan.
Noriko Hayashi for The New York Times
Air Force veteran Mike Fitzgerald of Kirkwood, Mo., stands near a protest outside the federal courthouse in St. Louis on Saturday. Photo: David Carson/AP
People walk on a footbridge across a flooded street Wednesday after an exceptional overnight “acqua alta” high tide. (Marco Bertorello / AFP via Getty Images)
People walk on a trestle bridge during high water in Venice on Friday. (Andrea Merola / AP)
A giant digital sign is seen at Facebook's corporate headquarters campus in Menlo Park, California
AFP via Getty Images
photo: 1975 Henry Diltz
Neil Young and Crazy Horse performing in Fresno
photo: CK Vollick
Rock and Roll Hall of Famers Buffalo Springfield, with members Stephen Stills and Neil Young at left, are shown at Gold Star Recording Studio in the 1960s. A San Diego musical about Gold Star is now under way.
(Photo by Henry Diltz)
Aaron Bernstein/Reuters
Interior Secretary David Bernhardt during a congressional budget hearing on Capitol Hill in May 2019. 
SOPA Images via Getty Images
A grizzly bear and her cub walk through a meadow in Yellowstone National Park. 
Bruce Bennett via Getty Images
An American bald eagle flies over Mill Pond with a freshly caught fish on July 29, 2018 in Centerport, New York. 
“they should have just called me directly. I remember all the shaky things I have done.” Neil Young
Monsanto must pay couple $2bn in largest verdict yet over cancer claims
Dealmaker: Trump and Leadership Council member Larry Kudlow (right) meet with auto executives in May 2018, a few months before the administration rolled back Obama-era fuel-efficiency standards, one of a number of giveaways to the fossil-fuel industry.
Photo credit: Evan Vucci/ AP/ REX/ Shutterstock
Jay Timmons, CEO, National Association of Manufacturers
Photo credit: National Association of Manufacturers
Harold Hamm, CEO, Continental Resources.
Photo credit: Sue Ogrocki/ AP/ REX/ Shutterstock
Dan DiMicco, Ex-CEO, Nucor Corp.
Photo credit: Rogelio V Solis/ AP/ REX/ Shutterstock
Bob Murray. CEO, Murray Energy
Photo credit: Jae C Hong/ AP/ REX/ Shutterstock
Flowering curly kale, a variety called Baltisk Rod Purpurkal, being grown for seed at Fresh Roots Farm in Montana. The farm is collaborating with the Organic Seed Alliance on a toolkit for farmers who want to produce seed. 
Kristina Hubbard
Farmers examining hybrid seed corn in Grundy County, Iowa, in 1939. (Library of Congress)
A hybrid seed corn dryer in Grundy County in 1940. (Library of Congress)
Lane Selman
Zeke, Rufus and I in Nashville 1977-ny
President Donald Trump signs a trade agreement with Chinese Vice Premier Liu He in the East Room of the White House on Jan. 15. Credit: Jabin Botsford/ The Washington Post via Getty Images 
*Trump speaks at a rally in Manchester, New Hampshire, on Feb. 10. Credit: Drew Angerer/ Getty Images *
Trump and Anthony Fauci at a coronavirus task force briefing at the White House on April 22. Credit: Jabin Botsford/ The Washington Post via Getty Images 
People gather on Florida’s Clearwater Beach during spring break on March 18. Credit: Mike Ehrmann/Getty Images
Trump speaks at a campaign rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, on June 20. Credit: Win McNamee/ Getty Images
gary ward
Search is the keyhole on the upper right. Direct access.
Young's quest to preserve high resolution audio included music player Pono. Photo: dhlovelife
Young requested that the Neil Young Archives "(not) look like a website." Image: Neil Young Archives
A look inside the Neil Young Archives. Image: Neil Young Archives
(Steve Marcus/Reuters)
People leave flowers at a makeshift memorial for shooting victims at the Cielo Vista Mall Walmart, in El Paso, Texas, on August 6, 2019. The August 3 shooting left 22 people dead.
photo: mark ralston
Elliot and Dana
A man who was sentenced to life in prison for selling $30 of marijuana will be freed
gary ward
Salwan Georges / The Washington Post
gary ward
Dom Thomas - Pool / Getty Images
Kai Schwoerer / Getty Images
gary ward
gary ward
gary ward
George Hood breaking his own world record. Photograph: Josef Holic 
Alejandro Rosales, 62 and his wife Guillerma Jamenca, 60, hold out pest-ridden potatoes. Photograph: Dan Collyns/The Guardian
The whistleblower complaint that has triggered a tense showdown between the U.S. intelligence community and Congress involves President Trump’s communications with a foreign leader, according to two former U.S. officials familiar with the matter. Trump is pictured Wednesday during a visit to the border with Mexico in Otay Mesa, Calif. (Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images) 
Scott Warren visits the site of now-closed copper mines outside Ajo, Ariz., on July 10, 2018. Photo: Laura Saunders for The Intercept
By Scott Warren
Scott Warren is a geographer living in Ajo, Arizona.
Democracy flying low with facebook info
An unidentified demonstrator runs through a cloud of teargas on the Kent State University Commons during a student antiwar protest, Kent, Ohio, May 4, 1970. The protests, initially over the US invasion of Cambodia, resulted in the deaths of four students (and the injuries of nine others) after the National Guard opened fire on students.
Howard Ruffner—Getty Images
Teenager Mary Ann Vecchio (kneeling, with white neckerchief) and others surround the body of Kent State University student Jeffrey Miller (1950 - 1970) who had been shot during an anti-war demonstration on the university campus, Kent, Ohio, May 4, 1970. The protests, initially over the US invasion of Cambodia, resulted in the deaths of four students, including Miller, and the injuries of nine others after the National Guard opened fire on students. Vecchio (who was not a KSU student) was also photographed in the Pulitzer prize-winning photograph (also by John Filo) that came to define the event.
John Filo—Getty Images
View, from behind, as Ohio National Guardsmen in gas masks and with rifles as they prepare to advance up Blanket Hill, through clouds of teargas, to drive back Kent State University students during an antiwar demonstration on the university's campus, Kent, Ohio, May 4, 1970. Visible at left is Taylor Hill. The protests, initially over the US invasion of Cambodia, resulted in the deaths of four students (and the injuries of nine others) after the National Guard opened fire on students.
Howard Ruffner—Getty Images
Paramedics and students run as they push the body of Kent State University student Jeffrey Miller (1950 - 1970) on a gurney after he'd been shot when the Ohio National Guard opened fire on antiwar protesters, Kent, Ohio, May 4, 1970.
Howard Ruffner—Getty Images
On Blanket Hill, Kent State University students, several with hands over their mouths, stare in the aftermath of the Ohio National Guard having opened fire on their antiwar demonstration, Kent, Ohio, May 4, 1970.
Howard Ruffner—Getty Images
Students kneel on the grass beside wounded classmate John Cleary after the latter had been shot when the Ohio National Guard opened fire on antiwar protesters, Kent, Ohio, May 4, 1970.
Howard Ruffner—Getty Images
Closeup of a bullet hole left in a metal sculpture after the Ohio National Guard opened fire on antiwar protesters at Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, May 4, 1970. In the background, an unidentified person photographs the hole from the opposite side. The sculpture, 'Solar Totem #1' by Don Drumm, is located outside Taylor Hall.
John Filo—Getty Images
