American Center for Law and Justice

President Joe Biden isn’t planning on going anywhere, as more and more within the Democrat Party call for him not to run for reelection. He wrote a letter to Democrats in the House of Representatives calling for unity in the fight to defeat President Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election. The Sekulow team discusses Biden’s letter and the turmoil surrounding his White House campaign, the reaction to Biden’s interview with ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos, the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity, Judge Aileen Cannon’s latest move in Trump’s classified documents case, the ACLJ’s legal work – and much more.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump and all past, present, and future Presidents have immunity from prosecution for “official acts.” The Justices’ immunity decision is a potential blow to several of the cases against President Trump (e.g., Special Counsel Jack Smith’s federal election case and classified documents case). The Sekulow team discusses how the SCOTUS decision affects Trump’s ongoing legal woes, the ACLJ’s ongoing legal work, the latest news in the 2024 presidential election between President Biden and President Trump – and much more.

Due to the U.S. Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling, Judge Juan Merchan delayed the sentencing in President Donald Trump’s New York trial until September 18. Will DA Alvin Bragg be forced to reopen the trial after much of his evidence included “official acts” from when Trump was President? The delayed sentencing date is huge for two reasons. First, much of the far Left hoped that the attention would shift from President Biden’s poor debate performance to Trump’s original sentencing date of July 11. And as we said last week, it will not be good news for President Biden if the media is still talking about replacing him after the long Independence Day weekend. Right now, the narrative isn’t shifting for Biden. Yesterday, the primary topic at White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre’s press conference was President Biden’s fitness for office. Also, an internal Democrat election poll was leaked that sounded the alarm for Biden’s reelection in swing states, and Trump is way ahead in fundraising now following the debate. The second reason that the delayed sentencing is significant comes from Judge Juan Merchan’s letter regarding the delayed sentencing: “The Court’s decision will be rendered off-calendar on September 6, 2024, and the matter is adjourned to September 18, 2024, at 10:00 AM for the imposition of sentence, if such is still necessary, or other proceedings.” Did you catch the important nugget: “if such is still necessary, or other proceedings”? In other words, the Supreme Court’s decision could derail Bragg’s case altogether. Within hours of the Justices’ decision, Trump’s lawyers contested this issue, setting off the chain of events leading to the delayed sentencing – a lot of movement happened quickly. Bragg had presented a broad case that ignored expired statutes of limitations and elevated what would have been a misdemeanor into 34 felony counts. Yet by going so broad, Bragg might have tanked his case completely by presenting evidence that would now be considered inadmissible. Trump’s lawyers filed a brief to have the jury’s verdict vacated, and the other side will be filing a brief in response. Judge Merchan will review the briefs (which the caveat “if such is still necessary” refers to) before the sentencing date. The judge might not have a reason to sentence President Trump at all. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

The Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity is a huge win for Donald Trump, as it significantly limits legal actions against him for conduct during his presidency. This ruling bolsters Trump's defense, making it much harder for prosecutors to pursue charges related to his time in office. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

New York Judge Merchan has delayed the sentencing of Donald Trump following the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity. This decision reflects the potential legal implications of the ruling, prompting a reassessment of the case. The delay allows for further examination of how the Supreme Court's decision affects Trump's legal standing and potential sentencing. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

The Democrat Party is now in a state of panic after an internal poll showed Biden losing in almost every state, including key swing states. These troubling results have intensified fears about the upcoming election and the party's overall strategy. The campaign is urgently reassessing its approach to regain voter confidence and secure critical swing state victories. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

Due to the U.S. Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling, Judge Juan Merchan delayed the sentencing in President Donald Trump’s New York trial until September 18. Will DA Alvin Bragg be forced to reopen the trial? The Sekulow team discusses the impact of the SCOTUS ruling on President Trump’s legal cases, the state of the 2024 presidential election between President Biden and President Trump, the ACLJ’s ongoing legal work – and much more.

The far Left is outraged over the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision regarding presidential immunity for President Donald Trump. President Joe Biden claims that the Justices have created a lawless country for U.S. Presidents, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) threatened to impeach the Supreme Court Justices. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

Yesterday, President Biden sharply criticized the Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity, describing it as a dangerous precedent. He argued that the ruling undermines the principle of accountability and could have far-reaching implications for future Administrations. What he failed to note is that the decision protects him as much as it does President Trump. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

The far Left is outraged over the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision regarding presidential immunity for President Donald Trump. President Joe Biden claims that the Justices have created a system that protects lawless U.S. Presidents, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) threatened to impeach the Supreme Court Justices (including Chief Justice John Roberts, who authored the majority opinion). The Sekulow team discusses the SCOTUS immunity ruling, AOC’s radical threat, how the high Court’s decision affects President Donald Trump’s legal cases and the 2024 presidential election, the parliamentary election results in France, ongoing ACLJ cases – and much more.

The U.S. Supreme Court just ruled that President Donald Trump and all former Presidents have immunity from prosecution for “official acts.” Chief Justice John Roberts authored the high Court’s majority opinion. The Hill explains: The Supreme Court on Monday capped its term by determining core presidential powers are immune from criminal prosecution, a win for former President Trump that returns his federal case involving efforts to overturn the 2020 election back to a lower court to determine whether his actions leading up to Jan. 6 merit the protection. . . . The decision takes a sledgehammer to some of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s indictment of Trump, determining that various actions Trump took to remain in power after losing the election were indeed protected. The Supreme Court agreed with our amicus brief in support of presidential immunity. The ruling is good for the office of the President and a huge win for former President Trump. As we’ve seen with the repeated targeting of Trump, prosecuting Presidents could become routine if the Constitution is ignored. The nature of presidential power entitles the President not just to immunity but to presumptive immunity for all official acts, meaning it’s presumed that the acts of the President are “official acts.” The Justices’ ruling sends the decision back to lower courts to determine which of Trump’s acts were official. What does the high Court’s decision mean for the outstanding cases against Trump? The ruling should be a death blow to Special Counsel Jack Smith’s case against Trump, and we expect to see motions to dismiss. This will also likely end Fani Willis’ case against President Trump in Georgia – under the Court’s analysis, the phone call in question in her case should be considered an official act. Smith’s classified documents case will have trouble as well since the documents in question were moved during Trump’s presidency. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

The latest Supreme Court ruling is yet another devastating loss to Jack Smith's legal cases against Donald Trump, further weakening his ability to pursue charges. This decision severely undermines Smith's prosecutorial strategy, casting doubt on the future viability of his efforts to hold Trump accountable. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

The recent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity effectively squashes Fani Willis's case against Trump in Georgia by barring prosecution for actions taken while he was in office. This decision dismantles the core of Willis's charges, making it nearly impossible to move forward with the case. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

The U.S. Supreme Court just ruled that President Donald Trump and all former Presidents have immunity from prosecution for “official acts.” (Chief Justice John Roberts authored the high Court’s majority opinion.) The immunity decision is a massive blow to Special Counsel Jack Smith’s federal election interference case against President Trump. The Sekulow team discusses how the SCOTUS decision affects Trump’s January 6 case, the ACLJ’s amicus briefs in recent Supreme Court rulings, the fallout of the CNN presidential debate between President Joe Biden and President Donald Trump – and much more.

In their post-debate analysis, the ACLJ highlighted key issues such as the economy and national security, which they believe Trump handled better than Biden. They noted that Biden struggled to counter Trump's arguments, particularly on immigration and foreign policy. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

In the recent debate, even the Left agreed that Trump gained an edge over Biden by effectively addressing key issues such as the economy, immigration, and national security. His arguments resonated with many viewers, highlighting perceived weaknesses in Biden's policies. This performance is likely to boost Trump's standing in the polls and energize his base. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

President Donald Trump just got a massive U.S. Supreme Court victory following the CNN presidential debate. On the other hand, the Democrat Party is in full-panic mode after President Joe Biden’s disastrous debate performance. Will Biden remain the 2024 Democrat presidential nominee going forward? https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

The Supreme Court's ruling on January 6 has dealt a fatal blow to Jack Smith's case against Trump. This decision undermines key aspects of the prosecution's arguments, significantly weakening their position. The ruling is expected to have a profound impact on the legal proceedings and Trump's defense strategy. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

President Donald Trump just got a massive U.S. Supreme Court victory following the CNN presidential debate (hosted by Jake Tapper and Dana Bash). On the other hand, the Democrat Party is in full-panic mode after President Joe Biden’s disastrous performance. Will Biden remain the 2024 Democrat presidential nominee going forward? The Sekulow team discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the Fischer/J6 case, the debate highlights, the election polls, possible candidates to replace Biden (Vice President Kamala Harris, former presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, California Governor Gavin Newsom, and former First Lady Michelle Obama), the SCOTUS decision overturning the Chevron case, which is a big blow to the Deep State, other ACLJ news – and much more.

CNN will host the first presidential debate tonight, moderated by Jake Tapper and Dana Bash. The debate between President Joe Biden and President Donald Trump is anticipated to be a pivotal moment in shaping voter opinions and could significantly influence the 2024 presidential election polls. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

CNN will host the first presidential debate tonight (moderated by Jake Tapper and Dana Bash). How will the debate between President Joe Biden and President Donald Trump affect the 2024 presidential election polls? Also, the U.S. Supreme Court is experiencing Déjà vu. Somehow, a major decision on abortion was erroneously uploaded to the high Court’s website prior to the Justices issuing a ruling – was it a leak (like with the Dobbs decision) or just an accident? As we’re sure you remember, the Biden Administration had conditional terms for tonight’s debate that President Trump signed off on. Three of the biggest requirements are that no audience will be present, the mics will be muted, and a major mainstream network must host. We have two questions: 1) How many people will watch tonight? We don’t imagine that most Americans are even engaged in the electoral process this early in the summer. 2) Will the debates even change anybody’s mind? Who is still unsure about who they’re going to vote for? https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

The U.S. Supreme Court is experiencing a case of déjà vu as a major decision was mistakenly uploaded to its website before the Justices officially issued a ruling. This premature release has raised concerns about the Court's internal processes and the security of its deliberations. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/stop-political-prosecution-of-president-trump?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06142024_seg-rumsekulow_top-GC_typ-PT_con-politicalprosecution

CNN will host the first presidential debate tonight (moderated by Jake Tapper and Dana Bash). How will the debate between President Joe Biden and President Donald Trump affect the 2024 presidential election polls? Also, the U.S. Supreme Court is experiencing Déjà vu. Somehow, a major SCOTUS decision was erroneously uploaded to the high Court’s website prior to the Justices issuing a ruling – was it a leak or just an accident? The Sekulow team discusses tonight’s debate, the Supreme Court’s ruling, the ACLJ’s fight to defend election integrity in Arizona – and much more.

New York Representative Jamaal Bowman's loss in his re-election is a significant setback for the progressive left. As the first member of the so-called Squad to be unseated, his defeat disrupts the momentum and influence the group has built within the Democratic Party. This outcome poses challenges for other progressive candidates who rely on the Squad's presence to advocate for their policies. https://aclj.org/israel/defend-israel-stop-biden-from-supporting-her-enemies?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06202024_seg-rumsekulow_top-I_typ-PT_con-defendisrael

Representative Jamaal Bowman (NY-16) was the first ever “Squad” member to lose a primary race – proof of the growing divide within the Democrat Party over Israel. Does the NYC primary election victory for pro-Israel George Latimer forecast potential results for the 2024 presidential election between President Joe Biden and President Donald Trump? The “Squad” – or rather the “Hamas Caucus” – has gained sizable traction in the last few years in the House, and this loss is a big blow to their cause. Rep. Bowman was one of 37 Democrats who voted against sending aid to Israel. He also voted against the Abraham Accords, meaning he didn’t want Israel to have a better relationship with other Muslim countries, among other radical anti-Israel measures. In other words, Bowman is as anti-Israel as you can be in New York, which has a strong Jewish population. However, he just got it handed to him in the primary. The votes are still coming in, but it looks like Latimer will take close to 60 percent of the votes. Clearly, the 16th congressional district has had enough of Bowman’s antisemitic, bizarre antics. (Don’t forget that he also once pulled a fire alarm to stop a congressional vote and is known for using extremely foul language at rallies.) Bowman didn’t hold back in blaming the AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) for his loss: “We should be outraged when a super PAC of dark money can spend $20 million to brainwash people into believing something that isn’t true. We should be outraged about that.” If the funds were dark money, how did Bowman know how much was donated? Also, it shouldn’t be shocking that AIPAC would support a candidate who isn’t so vocally anti-Israel. Unseating a sitting incumbent is not easy. However, Bowman clearly ignored his constituency with his radical antisemitism, and the votes show that. Losing by double digits is a shocking defeat. Don’t doubt Bowman’s loss also isn’t a wake-up call for President Biden. The growing divide within the Democrat Party is forcing Biden to walk a fine line between supporting Israel and creating distance with Israel. Though the pro-Israel candidate ultimately won, Bowman still got 40 percent of the vote, so how does the President appease the radical base? President Biden has been trying to have his cake and eat it too on the topic of Israel, and it could backfire. And what does Bowman’s defeat mean for the general election? President Trump had a massive turnout during his recent Bronx rally. New York could potentially be on the table for Trump. Many polls show Biden only leading by single digits in the state. Former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard reacted to Bowman’s loss: “I think that it is a positive sign that there is a movement inside the Democrat Party – or at least inside voters in New York in a district that probably leans very Democrat – that they don’t want these kinds of extremists who are really toeing the line on racism and antisemitism and encouraging violence against Jews . . . to be representing them in Congress. And there has been increasing violence against Jewish people. . . . [Some are] literally going out and chasing them down and hunting them down. It’s a terrifying time to hear from our Jewish friends sincerely questioning whether or not it is safe to . . . raise their kids and their families in the U.S.” The primary loss sent a shockwave through the far Left. The first presidential debate is tomorrow night. Let’s see if President Biden addresses the topic of Israel. https://aclj.org/israel/defend-israel-stop-biden-from-supporting-her-enemies?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=Rumble&utm_campaign=d-06202024_seg-rumsekulow_top-I_typ-PT_con-defendisrael