Dr. John Campbell

Human Rights Act 1998 Article 2 Right to life Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by law. Article 3Prohibition of torture No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1 Direct link to Dave, Independent Researcher https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing https://twitter.com/biologyphenom

A way forward in health and environmental care. If you would like to donate to the work in Uganda, 100% of donations go directly to the project, we currently spend 0% on admin. https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=XS59XPZ527YFL Link to Wefwafwa’s youtube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@WefwafwaAndrew Link to our organization's website: https://buwanga.org/ To contact Wefwafwa directly, wefandrew@gmail.com or WhatsApp+256756320736

THE HOPE ACCORD https://thehopeaccord.org ONE THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS A growing body of evidence suggests that the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths. The association observed between the vaccine rollout and these concerning trends is now supported by additional significant findings. These include the discovery of plausible biological mechanisms of harm demonstrated in laboratory and autopsy studies, as well as high rates of adverse events seen in randomised clinical trials and national surveillance programs. Altogether, these observations indicate a causal link. This new technology was granted emergency use authorisation to address a situation that no longer exists. Going forward, the burden of proof falls on those still advocating for these products to compellingly demonstrate that they aren’t resulting in net harm. Until such evidence is presented, regulators should suspend their use as a matter of standard medical precaution. TWO A COMPREHENSIVE RE-EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ALL COVID-19 VACCINE PRODUCTS Independent investigations must be properly resourced to allow a comprehensive re-evaluation of all Covid-19 vaccine products. There must be a full exploration of mechanisms of harm to provide insight into their impact on the human body, both short and long term. Effectiveness must be reassessed through a comprehensive review of actual clinical impact on illness and mortality, as opposed to synthetic results based on modelled assumptions. We call on the scientific community to come forward with findings from unpublished Covid-19 vaccine studies. This will help mitigate publication bias, whereby unfavourable results were often rejected or withheld due to fears of reputational damage. Crucially, government bodies and the pharmaceutical industry must also provide full transparency, granting access to previously undisclosed anonymised patient-level data from clinical trials and surveillance programs. These cumulative actions will help determine any real world benefit of these products versus the true extent of the damage caused. THREE THE IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION AND SUPPORT FOR THE VACCINE-INJURED The denial of vaccine injury is a betrayal of those who followed official directives, often under coercion from mandates restricting their access to work, education, travel, hospitality and sports. The vaccine-injured must be recognised and every effort made to understand their conditions. Support should include readily accessible multidisciplinary clinics offering investigation and treatment as well as appropriate compensation for all those who have been harmed. FOUR THE RESTORATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES ABANDONED DURING THE COVID-19 ERA Fundamental and cherished principles of medical ethics were disregarded on the premise of an emergency. These included: ‘first do no harm’, informed consent, bodily autonomy and the notion that adults protect children – not the other way around. The precautionary principle was inverted. Also, particularly concerning was the erosion of free speech – a democratic principle that underpinned the ability to question untested interventions whilst ensuring other principles were upheld. The consequence was exposing the public, especially healthy young people – including children – to unacceptable risks of harm. Emergencies are never a reason to abandon our principles; it is precisely at such times that we most profoundly depend on them. Only after acknowledging they were wrongly abandoned can we commit to upholding them consistently and in doing so, better protect future generations. FIVE ADDRESSING THE ROOT CAUSES OF OUR CURRENT PREDICAMENT The medical profession must lead by admitting we lost our way. By drawing attention to these medical and ethical issues surrounding the Covid-19 response, we hope to validate and amplify the call to establish the relevant facts and ensure vital lessons are learned. An honest and thorough investigation is needed, addressing the root causes that have led us to this place, including institutional groupthink, conflicts of interest and the suppression of scientific debate We ultimately seek a renewed commitment to the core principles of ethical medicine, returning to an era in which we strive for transparency, accountability and responsible decision-making throughout the spheres of medicine and public health.

THE HOPE ACCORD https://thehopeaccord.org ONE THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS TWO A COMPREHENSIVE RE-EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ALL COVID-19 VACCINE PRODUCTS THREE THE IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION AND SUPPORT FOR THE VACCINE-INJURED FOUR THE RESTORATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES ABANDONED DURING THE COVID-19 ERA FIVE ADDRESSING THE ROOT CAUSES OF OUR CURRENT PREDICAMENT

OECD data, Excess deaths https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?tm=excess%20mortality&pg=0&snb=3&df[ds]=dsDisseminateFinalDMZ&df[id]=DSD_HEALTH_MORTALITY%40DF_MORTALITY_EXCESS&df[ag]=OECD.ELS.HD&df[vs]=1.0&dq=.W.EM._T._T.&pd=2023-W01%2C&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false&ly[cl]=REF_AREA%2CUNIT&ly[rw]=TIME_PERIOD&vw=tb https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-average-baseline UK, Jan 2023 – week 16 2024 Total = 63,455 Weekly average = 7.9% US, Jan 2023 – week 16 2024 Total = 366,894 Weekly average, 10.0% Australia, 1 Jan 2023 – week 47 2023 Total = 18,421 Weekly average, 12.9% Canada, 1 Jan 2023 – week 6, 2024 Total = 59,011 Weekly average, 19.1% Weekly average for weeks 1 -6, 2024 = 14.6% Israel, Jan 2023 – week 16, 2024 Total = 7,332 Weekly average, 12.5% Weekly average for weeks 1 -16, 2024 5.8% 6.15% 12.4% 14.5% 17% 28.8% 20.5% 26% 26.7% 19.1% 21.8% 13.8% 10.3% 15.1% 6.3% Netherlands, Jan 2023 – week 16 2024 Total = 25,071 Weekly average, 13% Maintained for first 16 weeks of 2024 NZ Jan 2023 – week 16 2024 Total = 6,303 Weekly average 15.3%

Isle of Wight mushroom farm, https://www.iwmushrooms.co.uk/ Thanks to Alex and Dana for showing us around and teaching us about functional mushrooms.

Patient may be a risk to themselves and others. Lewy body dementias (LBD), 1.4 million in the United States. https://www.lbda.org/10-things-you-should-know-about-lbd/ Presence of Lewy bodies Typically progresses rapidly Lewy Body Dementia Association We understand that though many families are affected by this disease, few individuals and medical professionals are aware of the symptoms, diagnostic criteria, or even that LBD exists. Lewy body dementias (LBD) are the second most common form of degenerative dementia. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is most common. LBD can have three common presentations Some start with a movement disorder leading to the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease and later develop dementia. This is diagnosed as Parkinson’s disease dementia. Others start with a cognitive/memory disorder that may be mistaken for AD, leading to the diagnosis of ‘dementia with Lewy bodies’ (DLB). A small group will first present with neuropsychiatric symptoms, hallucinations, behavioral problems, difficulty with complex mental activities The most common symptoms of LBD include: Impaired thinking, such as loss of executive function (planning, processing information), memory, or the ability to understand visual information Fluctuations in cognition, attention, or alertness Problems with movement, including tremors, stiffness, slowness, and difficulty walking Visual hallucinations (seeing things that are not present) The symptoms of LBD are treatable Early and accurate diagnosis of LBD is essential Early and accurate diagnosis is important because LBD patients may react to certain medications differently than AD or PD patients. A variety of drugs, including some dementia meds and some antiparkinsonian medications, can worsen LBD symptoms. (LBD affects an individual’s brain differently than other dementias). Treatment should always be monitored by a physician and may include prescriptive and other therapies, exercise, diet, sleep habits, changes in behavior, and daily routines. Individuals and families living with LBD should not have to face this disease alone. LBD affects every aspect of a person – their mood, the way they think, and the way they move. The combination of cognitive, motor and behavioral symptoms creates a highly challenging set of demands for continuing care. Physician education is urgently needed. More research is urgently needed. Research needs include tools for early diagnoses, such as screening questionnaires, biomarkers, neuroimaging techniques, and more effective therapies. Currently, there is no specific test to diagnose LBD.

33% Agree COVID-19 Vaccine ‘Is Killing Large Numbers of People’ How much trust do you now have for the medical and pharmaceutical industries? A lot of trust, 17% Some trust, 37% Not much trust at all, 25% No trust, 18% Not much or none = 43% https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2023/population-estimates-age-sex.html https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-national-detail.html 262, 083, 034 Not much or none = 112, 695, 704 Do you agree or disagree with this statement about COVID-19 vaccines: "The vaccine is killing people, and is killing large numbers of people." Strongly agree, 16% Somewhat agree, 17% Somewhat disagree, 18% Strongly disagree, 39% Agree and strongly agree = 33% Agree and strongly agree = 86, 487,401 Conducted June 13 and 16-17, 2024 https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/public_surveys/crosstabs_2_covid_19_vaccine_june_13_and_16_17_2024 https://www.rasmussenreports.com In regard to getting vaccinated against the COVID-19 virus, which of the following best describes you: Adults, n = 1,223 No vaccine taken, 25% One vaccine, 14% More than one vaccine, 20% Two vaccines + booster, 38% Do you regret taking covid vaccine? One vaccine, 35% More than one vaccine, 43% Two vaccines + booster, 22% How much trust do you now have for the medical and pharmaceutical industries? Some trust No vaccine taken, 15% One vaccine, 12% More than one vaccine, 19% Two vaccines + booster, 53% Not much trust No vaccine taken, 30% One vaccine, 19% More than one vaccine, 27% Two vaccines + booster, 22% No trust at all No vaccine taken, 53% One vaccine, 18% More than one vaccine, 17% Two vaccines + booster, 10% Do you agree or disagree with this statement about COVID-19 vaccines: "The vaccine is killing people, and is killing large numbers of people." Strongly agree No vaccine taken, 58% One vaccine, 14% More than one vaccine, 16% Two vaccines + booster, 11% Somewhat agree No vaccine taken, 40% One vaccine, 20% More than one vaccine, 26% Two vaccines + booster, 11% Somewhat disagree No vaccine taken, 24% One vaccine, 19% More than one vaccine, 33% Two vaccines + booster, 22% Strongly disagree No vaccine taken, 5% One vaccine, 8% More than one vaccine, 14% Two vaccines + booster, 72%

Senate Homeland Security Committee Holds Hearing on the Origins of COVID-19 https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/hearings/origins-of-covid-19-an-examination-of-available-evidence/ FULL COMMITTEE HEARING ORIGINS OF COVID-19: AN EXAMINATION OF AVAILABLE EVIDENCE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kbUDmJPwtU

With my special thanks to my hosts, the Australian Medical Professionals’ Society, https://amps.redunion.com.au Direct link to this talk and others, https://amps.redunion.com.au/covid_revisited/program This talk was given as part of the AMPS conference in Sydney, Australia, April 2024.

Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine. https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/egvboakldpq/2024-06-15-pfizer-complaint-(002).pdf Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID- 19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19. To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine. Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a “safe and effective” vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of Kansas. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID- 19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission. 28. Millions of Kansans heard Pfizer’s misrepresentations about its COVID-19 vaccine. 29. In May 2021, Pfizer advertised to Kansans on Facebook about its “life-saving vaccines” and its “cures.” 30. Pfizer took advantage of Kansans’ fear of COVID-19 and desire for safety by offering a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine, while concealing, suppressing, and omitting material information that undermined its safety and effectiveness claims. in Kansas. B. Pfizer used confidentiality agreements to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 57. Pfizer has kept data hidden through confidentiality agreements with governments around the world. C. Pfizer used an extended study timeline to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 65. Scientists were outraged that they still could not review Pfizer’s COVID-19 study data. “Pfizer’s pivotal COVID vaccine trial was funded by the company and designed, run, analysed, and authored by Pfizer employees. The company and the contract research organisations that carried out the trial hold all the data.” D. Pfizer used FOIA denial and delay to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. E. Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group, which will conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 86. Pfizer planned to follow COVID-19 vaccine study participants, both vaccine and placebo recipients, for 24 months to monitor the safety and effectiveness of its vaccine. 87. Once the FDA approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine through an emergency use authorization in December 2020, Pfizer unblinded the study participants and offered vaccine placebo recipients the option to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. 88. Of the 21,921 vaccine trial participants who received the placebo, more than 20,000 placebo participants decided to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine as of March 13, 2021.

Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine. https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/egvboakldpq/2024-06-15-pfizer-complaint-(002).pdf Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID- 19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19. To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine. Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a “safe and effective” vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of Kansas. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID- 19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission. 28. Millions of Kansans heard Pfizer’s misrepresentations about its COVID-19 vaccine. 29. In May 2021, Pfizer advertised to Kansans on Facebook about its “life-saving vaccines” and its “cures.” 30. Pfizer took advantage of Kansans’ fear of COVID-19 and desire for safety by offering a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine, while concealing, suppressing, and omitting material information that undermined its safety and effectiveness claims. in Kansas. B. Pfizer used confidentiality agreements to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 57. Pfizer has kept data hidden through confidentiality agreements with governments around the world. C. Pfizer used an extended study timeline to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 65. Scientists were outraged that they still could not review Pfizer’s COVID-19 study data. “Pfizer’s pivotal COVID vaccine trial was funded by the company and designed, run, analysed, and authored by Pfizer employees. The company and the contract research organisations that carried out the trial hold all the data.” D. Pfizer used FOIA denial and delay to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. E. Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group, which will conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 86. Pfizer planned to follow COVID-19 vaccine study participants, both vaccine and placebo recipients, for 24 months to monitor the safety and effectiveness of its vaccine. 87. Once the FDA approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine through an emergency use authorization in December 2020, Pfizer unblinded the study participants and offered vaccine placebo recipients the option to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. 88. Of the 21,921 vaccine trial participants who received the placebo, more than 20,000 placebo participants decided to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine as of March 13, 2021.

Recent decline in sperm motility among donor candidates at a sperm bank in Denmark https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38834185/ Lassen E, Pacey A, Skytte AB, Montgomerie R. Recent decline in sperm motility among donor candidates at a sperm bank in Denmark. Hum Reprod. 2024 Jun 4 (Denmake, Canada, UK) Abstract Denmark, 2017 - 2022 Variation in semen quality among men applying to be sperm donors Summary answer The motile sperm concentration and total motile sperm count (TMSC) in ejaculates, both measures of sperm quality, declined by as much as 22% from 2019 to 2022. What is known already Questions remain about whether human semen quality has declined in recent years. Resolution of this issue has important implications for human fertility Study design, size, duration Semen quality of ejaculates previously collected from 2017 to 2022 Sperm bank locations, four cities in Denmark 6,758 donor candidates Between 18 and 45 years old (to determine whether their sperm quality met a minimum criterion for them to be accepted as sperm donors) Participants/materials, setting, methods All ejaculates were analyzed within 1 hour of production. Computer-assisted semen analysis Age, site, temperature. 2017 to 2019 Semen volume, sperm concentration, and total sperm count increased by 2-12% 2019 to 2022 Motile sperm concentration, down 16% Total motile sperm count, down 22% 2019 Concentration of motile sperm, 18.4 million/ml Total motile sperm count, 61.4 million per ejaculate 2022 Concentration of motile sperm, 15.5 million/ml Total motile sperm count, 48.1 million per ejaculate Limitations, reasons for caution We cannot determine from the available data the causes of the decline in semen quality from 2019 to 2022. Our results have implications for human fertility and the recruitment of sperm donors for medically assisted reproduction, where motile sperm concentration is an essential selection criterion because it influences fertility. We suggest that gathering health and lifestyle data on donor candidates at sperm banks might help to identify causal factors for the decline of sperm quality

James Roguski brings us up to date on the Pandemic Accords and International Health Regulations James Substack https://substack.com/@jamesroguski James Roguski, Speaking Truth to Power http://www.jamesroguski.com

Important statement from Dr. Joseph Fraiman, physician and clinical scientist. Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults https://twitter.com/JosephFraiman https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36055877/ My interview with Dr. Fraiman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsh5xNjc1Fs

A Hearing with Dr. Anthony Fauci https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/a-hearing-with-dr-anthony-fauci/

Important issues of life and death. Thanks to Neil Oliver and the GB News team.

March 2020 Paramedic stress https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0354-000001.pdf Robert Pollock Toe tagging letter. Discussions around age group, 70+ initially, discussion of over 50s Tough times ahead, would be supported Implementation unclear, but caused stress and pressures Clinical Adviser Paramedic, worked as a frontline paramedic during the pandemic. Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) 26. There was reporting in the media of the "toe tagging" of patients by age group which is wording for "do not try too hard to resuscitate them" over a certain age. Scottish Ambulance Service employees received a letter by email on Thursday 26 March 2020 from the Health and Care Professions Council which stipulated to every registrant that they realised there would be difficult decisions to be made by healthcare professionals, but they would be given full support to make decisions out with normal protocols. 27. … ordinarily, efforts were made to try and resuscitate every single person that has a feasible chance of success. However, the Health and Care Professional Council basically indicated that if employees did not do that on these occasions to coincide with the government statement, then they would fully support employees for any challenges employees may face as healthcare professionals. 28. This was very frightening for workers who have family members in that age group and it caused a lot of concern and anxiety for people who were used to doing their best to preserve life. The process of resuscitation has evolved, and we have a high success rate. This did not go down well with members. In addition, there were discussions about rumours within meetings with the Scottish Ambulance Service that the government had a plan to reduce the age group to those over 50s if Covid levels reached their expected peak and the plan for over 70s did not result in a significant enough drop in medical demand, with ages dropping depending on numbers coming through hospital. 29. Staff morale was severely affected, as they were trained to preserve life, they were paid lifesavers but at the time, they were told to do the complete opposite. This terrified staff that they might have to do this against their normal training and their normal desire to help. This was not a process that anyone welcomed.

Professor Colleen Aldous is a medical researcher in South Africa, her main work in addition to her own research is supervision of clinical doctors who are undertaking research. Link to original paper, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378624193_Wheel_Replacing_Pyramid_Better_Paradigm_Representing_Totality_of_Evidence-Based_Medicine https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Wheel-Replacing-Pyramid%3A-Better-Paradigm-Totality-Aldous-Dancis/72f1d5b3bd735eae69de57de6f8588cb5819098a

By definition, these serious adverse events lead to either death, are life-threatening, require inpatient (prolongation of) hospitalisation, cause persistent/significant disability/incapacity, concern a congenital anomaly/birth defect or include a medically important event according to medical judgement Covid vaccines may have helped fuel rise in excess deaths Experts call for more research into side effects and possible links to mortality rates https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/04/covid-vaccines-may-have-helped-fuel-rise-in-excess-deaths/ https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-06-high-excess-death-west-years.html Competing interests: None declared. https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000282 Excess mortality has remained high in the Western World for three consecutive years, despite the implementation of containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines. This raises serious concerns. Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate the underlying causes of persistent excess mortality. Insight into excess death rates in years following WHO’s pandemic declaration is crucial for government leaders and policymakers to evaluate their health crisis policies. This study explores excess mortality in the Western World from 2020 until 2022. Methods All-cause mortality reports, ‘Our World in Data’ 47 western countries Comparator Historical death data in a country from 2015 until 2019 Total excess deaths, 1 January 2020 until 31 December 2022 3,098,456 from Excess mortality 2021, 42 countries (89%) Excess mortality 2022, 43 countries (91%) Excess deaths 2020, 1,033,122 excess deaths (P-score 11.4%) 2021, 1,256,942 excess deaths (P-score 13.8%) 2022, 808,392 excess deaths (P-score 8.8%) Conclusions Excess mortality has remained high in the Western World for three consecutive years, despite the implementation of containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines. This raises serious concerns. Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate underlying causes of persistent excess mortality. More information The secondary analysis of the placebo-controlled, phase III randomised clinical trials of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines showed that the Pfizer trial had a 36% higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group. The authors of the secondary analysis point out that most of these serious adverse events concern common clinical conditions, for example, ischaemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome and brain haemorrhage. This commonality hinders clinical suspicion and consequently its detection as adverse vaccine reactions These reactions included cardiovascular diseases, coagulation, haemorrhages, gastrointestinal events and thromboses. Numerous studies reported that COVID-19 vaccination may induce myocarditis, pericarditis and autoimmune diseases. Postmortem examinations have also ascribed myocarditis, encephalitis, immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, intracranial haemorrhage and diffuse thrombosis to COVID-19 vaccinations. pulmonary embolism, acute myocardial infarction, immune thrombocytopenia and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Download a free copy of VITAMIN D3 and the Great Biology Reset, by Professor David Anderson and Dr David Grimes. https://dgreatbiologyreset.com/#download Dr Grime’s book to introduce the importance of vitamin D https://yorkbookshop.com/health-and-personal-development/307-vitamin-d-deficiency-and-covid-19-its-central-role-in-a-world-pandemic.html Welcome to Professor David Coussmaker Anderson, who has had a lifetime in medicine, consultant physician, professor of endocrinology, medical researcher, medical author, medical teacher and lecturer. Member of the royal society of medicine, member of the American endocrine society … we could go on.

If you would like to donate to the work in New Hope Children’s Centre, 100% of donations go directly to the project, we currently spend 0% on admin. https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=XS59XPZ527YFL Adam Stachura- Director of AGE Scotland https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0214-000001.pdf As an example, somebody got in touch with us later on in 2020 who was concerned about their grandfather who is a veteran. We understand from this exchange that paramedics arrived at his door one day and they handed him a bit of paper and said, "you need to keep this by your bed". It was a DNACPR decision document or slip. The slip was signed by a clinician that said discussion had been had with patient and reason was just two words "communication difficulties". (Presumably, linked to his hearing loss). In this instance the DNACPR was not about them having any condition that would mean there is substantial or significant underlying health condition, which would be challenging if they contracted COVID; they were being written off because it was hard to communicate with them. Even if it was the case that someone might face difficulties if they contracted COVID-19, why on earth is there a pre-emptive DNACPR? And particularly so with no discussion or any form of dignified process for the recipient. …. we had a sense that this was also be happening in care homes, where all residents were having DNACPR decisions issued in a blanket manner, not on an individual basis. I heard of examples where there were cases of COVID in care homes, a medical response was not forthcoming. COVID was simply going to go through the care home and there was not the resources to help everyone. And it would be said that "we're not transferring you to hospital because you're in a sort of a safe place. We'll try and manage your condition as best we can in the care home environment". We also found examples of people who upon leaving hospital found DNACPR decisions in their discharge papers without any discussion having been had with them. The box was ticked which said they had had a discussion, where in fact none was. It was the end of May 2020, I think, when it was becoming apparent that there were so many of these instances. Use free download link- https://ufile.io/xp4acnuj

Take the free cognative function test yourself, foodforthebrain.org Direct order for Patrick's book Upgrade Your brain, https://foodforthebrain.org/product/upgrade-your-brain-book-preorder/ Amazon link for the book for people outside of the UK, https://www.amazon.co.uk/Upgrade-Your-Brain-Unlock-Potential/dp/0008661200?crid=31ZSV4O2RLSZP&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.TQCWZQW06kHFWQKwo5iRI2IxK8N0jqHbvIH0M4RoXWHBV7I7dcEmxFhLDMTt3sVg0klSKQ7zb_--xje-F8T7OYxnnnkY3XNCKPS0asRb50IqqtaUjaorcyaR2ovSBQjn9OapQ-Vs5g6n8e1w3j7Iy7mhimPWRTc8oon9JFYXEN42ewMqtVyotjrjSl_iwBPT9Yv8y_BTjBU0AwrnmNZlC4I4uKVLmFIe9wbpMzmkDB4.7PPF8_cw_7l7wc81AMKISHxUGvDsOy5geU3O8JBvMf0&dib_tag=se&keywords=upgrade+your+brain+patrick+holford&qid=1716986254&s=instant-video&sprefix=upgrade+your+brain+patrick+holford,instant-video,69&sr=1-1&linkCode=sl1&tag=foodfortheb01-21&linkId=8de770776f3cdc5a00b10bcd0467db98&language=en_GB&ref_=as_li_ss_tl 00:00 - Introduction of Patrick Holford 01:30 - Discussion on dementia, its prevalence, and fear associated with it 03:30 - Dementia and nutrition: Introduction to the concept 04:50 - Alzheimer’s disease and its preventability 05:50 - Four biological drivers of brain breakdown: sugar, brain fats, B vitamins, antioxidants 08:50 - The role of fish consumption and omega-3 fatty acids 13:00 - Omega-3 index and its significance for brain health 16:50 - Case study of a man with mixed dementia improving through dietary changes 20:20 - Importance of specific types of fish and omega-3 sources 23:10 - Algae-based DHA supplements for vegetarians and vegans 26:50 - The role of B vitamins and methylation in brain health 35:50 - Combination of B vitamins and omega-3s to prevent brain shrinkage 40:00 - Impact of sugar and insulin resistance on brain health 49:30 - Importance of antioxidants in brain health 54:00 - The role of vitamin D in reducing dementia risk