The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20090616112119/http://open.salon.com:80/blog/dennis_loo/2009/06/14/dod_training_manual_protests_are_low-level_terrorism

Dennis Loo

Sometimes asking for the impossible is the only realistic path

Dennis Loo

Dennis Loo
Location
Los Angeles, California,
Title
Professor of Sociology
Company
Cal Poly Pomona
Bio
Co-Editor/Author of Impeach the President: the Case Against Bush and Cheney, World Can't Wait Steering Committee Member, dog and fruit tree lover. Published poet. Winner of the Alfred R. Lindesmith Award, Project Censored Award and the Nation Magazine's Most Valuable Crusade Award. Punahou and Harvard Honor Graduate. Ph.D. in Sociology from UC Santa Cruz. An archive of close to 500 postings of mine can be found at my blogspot blog, Dennis Loo, link below. I publish regularly at worldcantwait.net (link below) and also at OpEd News and sometimes at Counterpunch. Technorati Profile

JUNE 14, 2009 7:35PM

DoD Training Manual: Protests are "Low-Level Terrorism"

Rate: 14 Flag

The Department of Defense is training all of its personnel in its current Antiterrorism and Force Protection Annual Refresher Training Course that political protest is "low-level terrorism." 

The Training introduction reads as follows:

"Anti-terrorism (AT) and Force Protection (FP) are two facets of the Department of Defense (DoD) Mission Assurance Program. It is DoD policy, as found in DoDI 2000.16, that the DoD Components and the DoD elements and personnel shall be protected from terrorist acts through a high pirority, comprehensive, AT program. The DoD's AT program shall be all encompassing using an integrated systems approach."

The first question of the Terrorism Threat Factors, "Knowledge Check 1" section reads as follows:

Which of the following is an example of low-level terrorism activity?

Select the correct answer and then click Check Your Answer

O   Attacking the Pentagon

O   IEDs

O   Hate crimes against racial groups

O   Protests

*** 

The "correct" answer is Protests.

A copy of this can be found on the last two pages of this pdf.  

The ACLU learned of this training and on June 10, 2009 sent a letter to the Gail McGinn, Acting Under-Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, objecting to their training all DoD personnel that the exercise of First Amendment rights constitutes "low-level terrorism."  

For those who have worried about a trend - evident, for example, in the USA PATRIOT Act, the universal and ongoing government surveillance of all of Americans' electronic communications that began in February of 2001 (seven months before 9/11), the global war on a tactic (terrorism), therefore making this war unending, the unprecedented pre-emptive arrests of protestors at the 2008 Republican National Convention with those protesters being charged as "domestic terrorists," the justifications for torture, pre-emptive wars of aggression, ongoing occupations, American gulags such as Bagram, suspension of habeas corpus, and "prolonged detention" for acts someone might commit, not what they have done, FBI et al infiltration of protest groups and the government's acknowledged use of undercover agents (agents provocateurs) in said infiltration, thus giving the government under the rubric of fighting domestic terrorism unrestrained and unsupervisable power to suppress legitimate political activities, the unleashing and justifications for Christian fascists to murder those they do not like (such as the assassination of Dr. George Tiller and the killing at the Holocaust Museum a few days ago) - this news adds further fuel to the fire. 

These are not items from some famously vilified, non-US dictatorial regime. These are items from the good ole USA, land of the free and home of the brave.

Just how brave are we now? How free are we still? Are we brave enough to be "winter soldiers" and stand up against these fascist moves? Or will we go down in history in infamy, the way the "Good Germans" of the 1930s and 1940s did?  

 swiftluckgreens34vf

Satellite photo of one of the detention camps built by Halliburton's subsidiary, Kellogg, Brown & Root. This one's in Wyoming.

 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!

Comments

i am the kgb, and i urge you to not speak freely, lest you be held indefinitely based on what YOUR BELIEFS OR ASSOCIATES might imply about what you MIGHT be capable of.
you dont have miranda rights or habeus corpus or any other rights.

man, that clock is ticking!

before my son graduates - in six years - we will have american shot down in america, BY the american government.

but it wont only be four dead in ohio this time.

anyway, thats my prediction. because they are not just taking away our rights - they are decimating them rapidly.

and still, some defend obama.

some think *WE" give the conservatives victory. please. obama is the best damn whipping boy a white man ever saw.
Absolutely right Jane, especially about the four dead in Ohio being much less than what we are headed for.
A whole bunch of things were given to law enforcement nationwide. People who complain about the Federal Reserve. People who talk about the constitution. Anyone who could be pissed at the government. Supposedly people who get caught pissing on the side of the highway are now sex offenders. They just keep increasing the number of people they are justified in watching until everyone will be a target for spying.
Wasn't Obama going to end the wars and restore our liberties? monkey fingered and reddit.
"One of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in their struggle for independence." --Charles A. Beard
------------------
Any people anywhere being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government, and force a new one that suits them better. - Abraham Lincoln

Have a nice day.
Jim: that list is amazing. Pissing = sex offender!

BBE: Thanks!

Bill: "Have a nice day!" LOL
I would not be surprised if the federal government hires the formerly named, " Blackwater Inc.", to carry out missions against protestors which are now classified as low-level terrorists.

RATED
You wrote aove:

"ongoing government surveillance of all of Americans' electronic communications that began in February of 2001 (seven months before 9/11)"

I think it means that they are spying foreign nationals, too besides American citizens. And they are spying all emails and Internet publications.

After some time even writings like ours are considered to be low-level terrorism?

What are the means to find out, how they are actually doing it?

What is the office doing it, which companies have they hired for it?
Over the weekend, I took my younger son to a local college specializing in technology. They do all sorts of computer training there. I felt a distinct chill when one of the introductory speakers mentioned with pride that many of their graduates have gone on to work for the government, and mentioned the NSA and "dealing with all those bad guys." Oh god. It will be our kids who learn high-tech spying, with little or no grounding in ethics. Or maybe I'm paranoid?
Over the weekend, I took my younger son to a local college specializing in technology. They do all sorts of computer training there. I felt a distinct chill when one of the introductory speakers mentioned with pride that many of their graduates have gone on to work for the government, and mentioned the NSA and "dealing with all those bad guys." Oh god. It will be our kids who learn high-tech spying, with little or no grounding in ethics. Or maybe I'm paranoid?
Now I really am paranoid! There's an echo in here!
Blackwater is now calling itself Xe and yes, Closure, I would not be surprised in the least if they have already been hired for these purposes. We do know, relatedly, that Kellogg, Brown & Root, a Halliburton subsidiary, has built for the federal government, detention camps around the nation to hold those arrested in mass roundups. These camps can be seen in satellite photos, I will post one of them at the end of my post.

Hannu, yes, of course, you are correct that the massive surveillance has also been of non-Americans. I would refer you re: your questions to sources like Barbara Bowley's chapter in my book, Impeach the President, Chapter 9.

Cindy: Yes, the "getting the bad guys" is common talk in such company for these activities.
And does that mean anyone who protests can be wiretapped legally? Probable cause must be a lot easier when the very definition of what you're suspecting is “someone doing something similar once did something bad.” For example, if being a banker meant you could be wiretapped because you were a low-level embezzler, that would make it a lot easier on law enforcement trying to find high-level embezzlers. If playing baseball made you a low-level steroid user or low-level game thrower, that would make it easier to sniff out the high-level ones. Ick. So much for freedom of assembly.
Kent: The government's been wiretapping us since 2/01 and doing it blatantly illegally, but when this all came out when an AT&T employee discovered the NSA was doing it, Congress legitimated it after the fact, including in the well-known Telecom Amnesty Bill that Obama first promised to support a filibuster of and then ended up voting FOR the bill. Since taking office Obama has continued the surveillance of everyone and in fact, gone even further than Bush in claiming "sovereign immunity.' Glenn Greenwald has covered this story well.
but you only gotta worry if you're doing something wrong, right? right? :P

what a disaster.
It is a really dark night, you are traveling in a fast train full of friends and acquaintances. Everyone is laughing and having a good time. One guy stands up and calls for everyone’s attention. When everything falls silent, he tells them that he has evidence there is danger ahead. Not too far down the line, the train will go across a wide ravine. Hundreds of feet below, the river rages violently. Some of the track is missing and the train is doomed to plunge into the flood below with fatal consequences. Before the train reaches the river; however, it will make one final stop at a station where those who want to can get off. After that it will speed on to its final doom.

After the train pulled into the station, the speaker and a few who understood the risks stepped off. A majority remained, mocking them with impunity. The doors soon closed and the train shuffled off slowly from the station. The crowd inside the train laughed and joked amongst themselves about the “wiseman” and “his flock.” All but one young lady, just staring up at the route map. The train reached full speed. Then she turned anxiously to everyone and said, “I think we made a big mistake. We should have listened to that guy! There’s construction on the bridge ahead according to this route map!” Everyone looked out the right side windows in horror as the train continued around a bend speeding headlong towards the unfinished bridge ahead over the ravine.

The jackboots are on, polished, and ready to march. Watch out.

http://once4all.wordpress.com
Yep, when regular legally protected political protest is becoming classified by the powers-that-be, we know we have turned another corner into darkness. Perhaps this is the era the Great UN-enlightenment
uh ..., my above should read "... classified by the powers-that-be as terrorism..."

Oh, yeah,
RATED
Dennis, you missed my point. I know about the ongoing wiretapping, but I was just wondering if antics like this are an attempt to render such deeds legal by reclassifying the subjects as terrorists and thus somehow validating things. Once we're all terrorists, we can all be listened to.
I hope, I hope, I hope that this classification of protests as "low level terrorism" is a poorly enacted euphemism brought on by vestiges of the paranoia which became institutional post-9/11 and that it does NOT indicate a mind-set or any insidious intent on the part of the government or DOD. And I also hope that even if DOD personnel continue to undergo this training that it is "targeted" towards a legitimate effort to reduce damage and disturbance during a riot or that it is training which might keep competing ideologues from confrontation by placing miliatry personnel between parties. (None of that is unprecedented by the way).

Although, some of us remember the White House Enemies list and how paranoid many of us who had any level of campus activism at all were of the Nixon administration in the early 70's.
Kent,

I doubt there is any other motivation behind this. It is the coming home of the Bush/Cheney "enemy combatant" labeling of people to attempt getting around the clearly drawn legal lines and protections they should have. Obama must shoulder some blame for this, too, because he is not making the stands necessary to dissuade this kind of thing.
:thud: There is a file as big as my head on me if protesting in terrorism. help.
Walter,

Do you really think classifying “protests” as “terrorism” can encompass anything good? I ask this respectfully, no disrespect intended. What would the good be? What is the point of using this terminology?

I just think it is way past time for “hoping” these bad things are not happening as they happen.
okay, i'm done :thudding: i'm still brave. I don't want to be a good German....this is legacy for me...my Jewish blood rises up at the very mention of fascism.
Kent: Actually, I did understand your point originally. I perhaps could have made my initial response clearer as a take-off from your point rather than an "answer" to your query, which was really a rhetorical point.

Wayne: As Rick said.

Forgiven: Powerful metaphor!

Montcalm: Yep.

Robin: Your blood, as it should!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1192958/300-000-salute-Irans-election-LOSER--man-shot-dead-police-open-rally-Ahmadinejad.html





that is a link to an article in the daily mail (rag, but still) of the iranian police shooting a man dead for protesting.....

i guess, according to the DoD, since he is a low level terrorist.....
The other thing about the DoD's Training Manual test in the featured question is that it is an obviously leading question.

The other answer choices are clearly wrong so the "right" answer reminds me of the dumbed down kind of questions/answers that have become all too common in American classrooms.

We don't want DoD personnel to be thinking, after all. We will lead them to the answer we want them to give so that even if they're a little slow, they can still do what we want them to do.

Which of the following is an example of low-level terrorism activity?

Select the correct answer and then click Check Your Answer.



O Attacking the Pentagon

O IEDs

O Hate crimes against racial groups

O Protests