Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Dr. Yousef Al-Othaimeen has denounced a recent wave of suicide bombings in Afghanistan.
Al Othaimeen also stated that:
there can be no justification for any violent action and killing under the pretext of Holy Quran and Islam.
The OIC’s goal has been to promote its victimhood “Islamophobia” imperative through its “Islamophobia Observatories,” which present Muslims as victims and ignores the human rights abuses, persecution and atrocities against innocent people that are frequently committed in the name of Islam. Actions such as raping infidel women, execution for apostasy and homosexuality, beheadings, stonings, striking terror into the hearts of disbelievers, are all justified by Islamic texts, and are routinely practiced globally. This includes actions by Islamic states as well as groups such as Al Qaeda, the Islamic State, Al Shabaab, Boko Haram, etc. Bloody jihad is even mandated by the Muslim Brotherhood in accordance with statements of its founder Hassan al-Banna, and is seen increasingly as the Muslim Brotherhood becomes more aggressive in Egypt.
These facts are contrary to the false proclamations by the OIC chief, as it has been abundantly demonstrated that there is textual justification for such violence.
The OIC abandoned the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1990 to embrace the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights, which is based on the Sharia. The taqiyya-practicing Yousef Al-Othaimeen is promoting the cause of the expansionary Sharia.
“Suicide attacks on civilians are un-Islam: OIC chief”, by Javid Hamim Kakar, Pajhwok, February 27, 2018:
KABUL (Pajhwok): Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Dr. Yousef Al-Othaimeen has denounced a recent wave of suicide bombings in Afghanistan.
Prior to the 2nd meeting of the Kabul Process on February 28, Al-Othaimeen said: “There can be no justification for any violent action and killing under the pretext of Holy Quran and Islam…”
In a statement to the Saudi Press Agency (SPA), the OIC head said those who perpetrated suicide attacks against civilians did not represent the faith of Islam.
He also referred to the resolution of the Council of OIC Foreign Ministers, endorsed by the Islamic Summit of heads of state and government.
The resolution called on OIC member states and the international community to support the Afghan-led and Afghan-owned peace and reconciliation process.
Dr. Al-Othaimeen appealed to all Member states and their institutions to spare no efforts in helping the Afghan government at this crucial time, considering its success would raise hopes for lasting peace, stability and economic prosperity of the country…..
Adrian says
OIC refusing to ratify the Universal Declaration of Human Rights screams louder than any pathetic whimpers by taqiyya cult members…
mortimer says
TAQIYYA MEISTER … OIC … the worldwide headquarters of ISLAMIC DISINFORMATION …
DEFINITION OF VERBAL JIHAD: Taqiyya is verbal jihad used in Islam to DECEIVE and MISLEAD the dirty disbelievers (“kufaar”) concerning the meaning, motive and methods of jihad, in order to subjugate and humiliate them under discriminatory Sharia law.
Dr. Yousef Al-Othaimeen is a professional VERBAL JIHADIST.
mortimer says
Dr. Yousef al-Othaimeen is lying when he claims Islam does not teach KILLING. One example suffices to show that VIGILANTE MURDER OF BLASPHEMERS is a DECREE IN SHARIA LAW:
Sharia permits the MURDER of anyone who verbally opposes Islam, since they are at war with Islam:
– “There is no indemnity obligatory for killing a non-Muslim (harbi) at war with Muslims.” -Reliance of the Traveller, o4.17, p.593
– “We have already discussed killing the person who, with intent, curses the Prophet, belittles him or slights him in any way. The judgement in this case is clear.” (i.e. the sentence is execution)
– from Sharia law manual, “Qadhi Iyaadh in ash-Shifa”, Volume No.2, Page No. 27
– as-Suyuti writes: “(If they break their oaths…) This ayah (K. 9:11-12) is used as a proof by those who say that if a dhimmi attacks Islam (VERBALLY) or the Qur’an or MENTIONS the Prophet in a bad manner, HE IS KILLED, whether he has broken a treaty or not.”
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
mortimer, what is the root of the term “taqiyya “? cite any Islamic sources where It is stated as deception of unbelievers by Muslims. Ignorant idiot !!
gravenimage says
This is just hilarious–Ibrahim itace muhammed is himself practicing Taqiyya here, pretending that Taqiyya does not exist.
In fact, there are numerous Islamic terms for lying to the Infidels besides Taqiyya (a Shia term), including Kitman, Tawriya, Taysir, Darura, and Maruna.
The Qur’an is full of exhortations for Muslims to break their oaths with Infidels, and the “Prophet” himself said that assassins can lie to their victims so that they can get close enough to murder them.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 369:
Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:
Allah’s Apostle said, “Who is willing to kill Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?” Thereupon Muhammad bin Maslama got up saying, “O Allah’s Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?” The Prophet said, “Yes,” Muhammad bin Maslama said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab). “The Prophet said, “You may say it…”
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/bukhari/059-sbt.htm#005.059.369
He also said, “War is deceit”–and Muslims are always at war with unbelievers.
Billy Chickens says
Ibrahim
You’re a rock worshiper. Muslims to go to Mecca to worship a ROCK. That’s blasphemy, so who is the “ignorant idiot”?
Jack Diamond says
One pillar of jihad is fighting but the other is deception: “war is deception.”
Bukhari Hadith no. 5780 (reports that the Prophet said) “We must deal with our enemies with smiles on our faces and curses in our hearts.” Deception of unbelievers by Muslims, citing Islamic sources.
Sirah al-Halabiyyah v.3 p.61 “Hajj ibn ‘Aalat told ‘O Prophet of Allah: I have in Mecca some excess wealth and some relatives, and I would like to have them back. Am I excused if I bad-mouthed you to them (to fool the non-Muslims)?” The Prophet excused him and said ‘Say what you have to say.’ ”
Say what you have to say– to conceal your motives from the unbelievers. To enrich the Muslims. To assassinate their enemies. To infiltrate and conquer them (think of Muhammad telling the Jews of Yathrib what they wanted to hear, of his admiration and friendly intentions, while at the same time he was making a secret pledge of war against them (“blood, blood, destruction, destruction!”) with the the Aws & Khazraj. This was “war is deception” put into action by the model of conduct for all Muslims.
Smile in their faces (unbelievers) while cursing them in your hearts. Muslims may even lie under oath if it further Islam or guards them from the kuffar. Treaties with kafirs are only honored as long as it serves the interests of the Muslims, broken when they do no longer (Hudaybiyyah). The Qur’an even teaches a Muslim may deny his faith to protect himself {deny Islam and blaspheme Allah} as long as his faith remains true: “anyone who after accepting faith in Allah, utters unbelief, except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith.” (16:106).
Say what you have to say.
Muda’rat, the Sunni equivalent of taqiyya–deception, trickery, concealment–which can be practiced on anyone under necessity, but is otherwise allowed for ten specific categories of persons according to Sunni scholars. Number one on the list?
A Kaffir (non-Muslim).
Sharia–Reliance of the Traveller (p. 746 – 8.2) – “… If a praiseworthy aim is attainable … by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory…
Ibn Kathir (d. 1373) writes, “Whoever at any time or place fears evil [from non-Muslims] may protect himself through outward show.” [As proof of this, he quotes Muhammad’s close companion] Abu Darda, who said, “Let us grin in the face of some people while our hearts curse them.” [And another companion, simply known as] Al-Hasan, who said, “Doing taqiyya is acceptable till the Day of Judgement [i.e., in perpetuity].”
Deceit toward unbelievers is primary since hate and enmity for unbelievers is primary.
Qur’an 3:28: “Let believers [Muslims] not take Kaffirs [non-Muslims] for “auliya”{friends, helpers, allies} instead of believers. Whoever does this shall have no relationship left with God—unless you but guard yourselves against them, taking precautions {deception towards non-Muslims}…”
Thus, Tabari on verse 3:28: “If you [Muslims] are under their [non-Muslims’] authority, fearing for yourselves, behave loyally to them with your tongue while harbouring inner animosity for them … [know that] God has forbidden believers from trusting or being on intimate terms with the infidels rather than other believers—except when infidels are above them [in authority]. Should that be the case, let them act friendly towards them while preserving their religion.”
Jack Diamond says
“By Allah, and Allah willing, if I take an oath and later find something better than that, then I do what is better and expiate my oath.” Bukhari v.7 bk67, n.424
“If you ever take an oath to do something and later on you find something else is better, then you should expiate your oath and do what is better.” Bukhari v.9 bk89 n.260
Where did this come from? Muhammad went to visit his wife Hafsa and saw her maid Mariyah, a beautiful Coptic girl. Muhammad lusted after Mariyah and got rid of Hafsa by LYING to her that her father wanted to see her, then he bedded Mariyah. Hafsa returned sooner than expected and found them together. She made a scene (!) and a contrite Muhammad promised he’d leave Mariyah alone. Except he still wanted Mariyah.
Allah to the rescue! A new surah is (conveniently) revealed that it is alright for Muhammad to break his oath have have sex with his “right hand possession.” {“O Prophet! Why do you ban (for yourself) that which Allah has made lawful to you, seeking to please your wives? Allah has already ordained for you (O men) the dissolution of your oaths.”} Q 66:1-5
–source, Ali Sina “Understanding Muhammad and Muslims” p.91-92
Oaths mean nothing, promises mean nothing, and lying to unbelievers is second-nature.
But Allah himself lies and deceives (is the greatest of deceivers) so we have deceit at the very center of this alternate universe, Islam.
gravenimage says
Fine posts, Jack.
Charlie says
It seems there are 2 Islams.
The first is a manifesto, or doctrine of a Theocratic warlord/insurgent from the 7th century that advocates perpetual war against the unbeliever on the pretext of their disbelief. The use of terrorism and any tactic of war to achieve the ends of Islamic dominion is advocated.
The second Islam is the modern media Islam that pretends to be whatever is appealing to public relations advocates, corporate media, and identity politics. The second Islam glosses over the hard facts of the fundamental narratives and exhortations of the earliest doctrinal imperatives rules and guides. This second form of Islam relies on the corruptibility, ignorance, and intellectual laziness of the corporate media, public, legal system, academia, and the politicians in charge. Purveyors of truth are like Cassandra warning the Trojans. In the words of George Orwell, “war is peace”, and “in times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act”.
Bev says
Islam is Jihad. forever and ever, Amen.
mortimer says
OIC is disseminating VERBAL JIHAD (Islamic disinformation).
If a Muslim does not CONDUCT VERBAL JIHAD about the meaning, motive and methods of jihad, then that Muslim has left Islam.
100% of Muslims deceive the DIRTY KUFAAR about jihad … or else they are not practicing ORTHODOX ISLAM … deceiving the KUFAAR about jihad is NORMATIVE ISLAM, rather than an aberration.
Benedict says
Cogent comment, Charlie.
Halal Bacon says
What an Islamophobe
Peter says
Either the OIC chief is a heretic and introducing “innovation” (shirk) or he is engaged in deliberate disinformation to deceive non-Muslims: the ignorant, the naïve, the willfully stupid do-gooder projectionists (of non-Muslim values and assumptions onto Muslims who don’t share them), Quisling collaborators (multiculturalists, PC thought police, Animal Farm Fascists or Antifa, Leftists, neo-Marxists), etc… Since he would be attacked and even killed for the former, one can only assume the latter is the intent.
mortimer says
Peter… it is deliberate DISINFORMATION !
“Taqiyya permeates almost all the activities and dealings of Muslims with non-Muslim societies…” – a former sheikh Sam Solomon
Muslims imitate Allah ‘THE BEST OF DECEIVERS’.
“Allahu khayru l-makireena” – Koran. 3:54; cf. 8:30
Bob Carrillo says
Perhaps they can deny them all the extra helping of ice-cream and cake as well.. That’ll do the trick alright..
Ever try to reason with a rabid animal?
Good Luck..
mortimer says
At last, Red Riding Hood said, “GRANDMA, WHAT BIG TEETH YOU’VE GOT!”
The wolf then replied, “All the better to eat you with, my dear!”
balam says
Mohammad/ a.k.a Allah speak with a FORK TONGUE in the Quran .Hence ,the followers of Mohammad can NEVER be trusted. TAQQYIA or LYING is morally permissible in Mohammadanism. It is safer to trust a POISONOUS SNAKE than a MUSLIM .Truthfulness and HONESTY are certainly not in the blood of Islam .Muslims in general are basically dishonest like their master MOHAMMAD who had NO MORALS .Mustafa Kemal Ataturk called ISLAM AS THE ABSURD THEOLOGY OF AN IMMORAL BEDUOIN.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Balam, It appears that you have received full inspiration of lies from your yahweh and his wife Ashera hero gods designed by the Satan .you ,yahweh and his wife Ashera Will casted into hottest lake of hellfire together with the Satan (holy spirit).
LeftisruiningCanada says
duh…..god’s wife isn’t ashera, it’s mary…
sheesh, don’t you know anything?
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Leftruinigcanada, you mean your mithraist pagan god had sex with Mary and mithraist jesus was born ? True God is above having sex .
Ashera was the wife of Israelites hero god, a clear satanism
LeftisruiningCanada says
“True God is above having sex”
I know, shame your prophet didn’t.
gravenimage says
Why is the abysmally ignorant Ibrahim itace muhammed still babbling about Jews worshipping Ashera?
LeftisruiningCanada says
When you don’t have any real arguments or evidence, the next best thing seems to be making stuff up.
Islamic mirror says
how jihadis view the so-called “verses of tolerance.”
Muslims will say in Western court : Damn your legislation, damn your nationality, go to hell. Hey you infidels, I do not worship what you worship.”
chapter 109 of the Qur’an, which is an early Meccan sura that is usually presented as an example of the tolerance of Islam. Here it is, in its entirety: “Say, ‘O disbelievers, I do not worship what you worship. Nor are you worshippers of what I worship. Nor will I be a worshipper of what you worship. Nor will you be worshippers of what I worship. For you is your religion, and for me is my religion.”
But here, Islamic terrorist is not sweetly quoting it as a sign of tolerance, but spitting it out in a western courtroom as part of repudiation of Western law and demand to be tried only under Sharia (by which terrorist would be found not guilty, as war on Infidels is mandated in the Qur’an and Sunnah). In other words, Islamic terrorist does not recognize civilized Western law, where trying to slaughter Infidels is actually a crime. They NEVER observe the Laws of the Countries in which they reside in. It’s a complete ‘oil and water’ scenario. THIS IS THEIR INDOCTRINIZATION- DO NO ASSIMILATE
Islamic terrorist doesn’t worship what the infidel worship; Islamic terrorist worships Allah alone, which makes Islamic terrorist “the best of people” (Qur’an 3:110), and Islamic terrorist refuses to be judged by the standards of the unbelievers, who are the “most vile of created beings” (Qur’an 98:6). It is an insight into how jihadis view the so-called “verses of tolerance.”
In Court, every time you misbehave, don’t stand up, or spit at officers, your punishments should be more.
muslims have a very strange way of thinking.
They seem to think ,that once they have an English or American passport, they are allowed to follow their own laws, because they are British then or Americans and they have a saying in the laws of the land.
And they were saying, that we are the stupid ones, didn’t we know yet that Islam is in war with the Western world already since 2002 ?Was this war declared to us somewhere?
Any news, information, quotations from the very UN-holy koran OR true History is always to be considered as “Un-islamic” or “Anti-izlamic”!
This vast cult of blood and death, founded by the Prince of Darkness Himself (SATAN/allah) can not stand up to the full sun light of TRUTH! SO the full truth about izlam must be suppressed at all costs!
a radical Imam inspiring terrorists. There are many, many instances, all over the map, of Imams inciting violence and hate. Behind almost every terrorist attack there is an Imam or islamic cleric as the ideological leader. I mean you can trace back intolerance, hate and incitement to violence up to ayatollahs and important muftis.
What is surreal is that after every attack everybody is quick to condemn the radical cleric that everybody knew, but before the attacks these clerics seem to attrack many people.
time and again well known radical imams are allowed to continue preaching. Somehow after the attack the community is quick to condemn the radical Imam, but before the attack the community just tolerates the radical imam.
“An Islamic theologian has investigated how radicalization of Muslims in Europe is related to their knowledge of their own religion. The widespread view that radical Muslims know little about Islam is wrong. According to a study, Islamic teaching plays a greater role in the radicalization of young Muslims in Europe than is often assumed. -“Islam plays a greater role in radicalization,” translated from “Islam spielt bei Radikalisierung größere Rolle als angenommen,” Welt
If an imam makes a statement he wants to fight terrorism, what he really wants is to limit any growing indication from the growing knowledge by non believers that Islam is a war doctrine that is read directly from the verses of the Quran. Just like saying it is forbidden for muslims to commit suicide, however it is paid for by their islamic charities or zakat to pay the families who martyr themselves in the jihad attacks, but turn around and blame the non muslim victims, as they say they have a peaceful answer for everything when the public is not informed and they fall for the professional fib. So when things get a little out of control,ie the word is getting out, then the Imam sets up outreach, to contact politicians, families and local newpapers, media to have a little tea party with cookies get back in to the good graces. What do they explain….muslims are victims of islamophobia so that anyone who says any different is a hater.
Clever bunch. 1400 years of perfecting two jihads one for the mind and one of violence or the “misconstrued theological ideas” often referred to as hijacking Islam…when they are hijacking truth.
mortimer says
Mirror, ABROGATION is the game changer.
The Verse of the Sword (Koran 9.5) abrogates over 100 PEACEFUL, ‘TOLERANT’ verses, leaving them ‘disabled’, inoperative and even obsolete.
When jihad comes, all Muslims ignore those ‘TOLERANT’ Koranic verses completely.
It is VERBAL JIHAD to lie about ABROGATION as Dr. Yousef Al-Othaimeen is doing here. He knows ALL about ABROGATION. He is a KING-SIZED DECEIVER.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Ignorant fool mortimer, show me with examples how 100 verses were Abrogated. mithraist christians are liars to the core.
LeftisruiningCanada says
You see what you’re doing Ibrahim?
You run from one demand to another, but when you get answered and can’t reply, you disappear like a coward.
Why is that?
gravenimage says
What claptrap–the Qur’an itself notes that certain passages–usually those that are less violent–have been abrogated.
Qur’an 2:106:
Nothing of our revelation (even a single verse) do we abrogate or cause be forgotten, but we bring (in place) one better or the like thereof. Knowest thou not that Allah is Able to do all things?
Islamic mirror says
Muslims will always claim victim status: Why should they get more concern than the Yazidis? Or the Copts, middle east Christian or other African Christians and all the Islamic countries Christians? “Many around the world are unable to see Christians and non muslims as victims” . Muslims are the single greatest force for evil in all the world. Almost 33,000 documented Islamic terrorist attacks just since 9/11 is just partially dispositive of what a curse Muslims are to mankind.
total inversion of reality
islamists are doing the killing ,non-Muslims everywhere always get the brunt of it. This grotesque attempt yet again to portray Muslims as victims after a jihad attack is just the latest of many, as this is a tried and tested response straight out of the playbook for Muslim spokesmen in the West, but it nonetheless still amounts simply to an attempt to deflect attention from where it should be. Authorities should be challenging the Muslim community in West today about the extent of sympathy for the Islamic State within their communities, since the Islamic State has called for stabbing attacks in the West. They should be calling upon Muslims in West to begin to back up their words of condemnation for the attack with real action to counter the idea that it is a righteous deed to commit violence against the kuffar. Instead, as always, we get this disgusting victimhood posturing. Remember: no Muslims were stabbed in West, nor should they be, but from the tenor of this article, you might get the impression that an “Islamophobe” had targeted Muslims in West. It’s a total inversion of reality.
how the establishment media narrative works?
When racist, bigoted “Islamophobes” supposedly target Muslims, Muslims are victims.
And when Muslims fake “Islamophobic hate crimes,” Muslims are victims. Not only that, but when Muslims scream “Allahu akbar” and murder infidels, Muslims are victims. Always and in every situation, Muslims are victims, to be appeased and accommodated in every possible way. Once you understand, we can all lock arms and march together into our glorious multicultural, diverse future.
The fake hate crime was a hate crime against non-Muslims, intended to incite communal hatred… Chances are that reports of fake hate crime was coordinated by mom and dad, and possible the Mosque, as well.
On reflection I don’t think the possibility of a backlash should be ignored. I urge Prime Minister Trudeau to evacuate all Muslims to a safe Muslim country like Sweden, France, Germany or England until the matter can be studied further. Yemen is best.
“many around the world are unable to see Muslims as victims”
That’s why the words Hinduphobia, Christianophobia, Judeophobia, Scientolophobia, Mormonophobia, Yazidiphobia, Zoroastrophobia and Sikhophobia so dominate the headlines
when we as non-muslim raise “concerns” about our own safety we’re labelled as being Islamophobic?!
there was racism, but other communities had to put up with that too (Catholic Irish people couldn’t find jobs and were openly discriminated against, for example , jews). The Muslim community doesn’t have a monopoly on victim status. Every group has been a victim, and every group has victimised others.
Can’t wait for all the water carriers to lecture us on how “Muslims” fear of backlash. “Muslims” are always the victims never the victimizers
1) Jihad is required 2) ways to perform jihad: be a fighter, a supporter, lie, play victim: all of the written can be found in Reliance of the Traveller: Islamic sharia law: chapter o9.0 page 599 begins details on jihad under sharia law and other chapters of said book as well as the Koran and other Islamic teachings.
Prophet stated: “He who provides the equipment for a soldier in jihad has himself performed jihad” page 600
How can a Muslim be trusted when their law states to wage jihad (war) against all foreign nations? How can you trust a Muslim when you do not know whats behind the eyes and mind of a person taught to kill, lie and deceive? Would you trust a Muslim knowing sharia law and that its trying to destroy Constitution, civilization of un-Islamic countries?
Muslim “extremists” they are doing EXACTLY what their holy book says to do
Moslems need to stop worrying about how others perceive them. They really do. They need to stop playing the victim card, and start thinking of non-Moslems for a complete and absolute change.
Moslems are the most self-centered people who ever walked the face of the earth.
“Muslims fear a backlash” That would be un-Islamic. And it would undermine the victimology subterfuge strategy they pursue so effectively everywhere- one of the primary components of the global jihad.
a typical “backlash” story, of the kind that invariably appears after a jihad attack on Islamic allah or foiled jihad plot. It attempts to deflect attention away from the jihad terror and onto all Muslims as victims, their religion unfairly demonized.
underbed cat says
Islam is Islam and deception is the core of covering the dawah and it owns seeds of terror found in the instruction manual of the Quran and the sickening brutality suffered by the victims of the jihad violence gets washed away with statements from the head of the OIC, with the purchasing of interests in our media, donations to major universities, political campaigns, spread of mosques in the U.S that teach terror and deception with funds from NAIT, with the money resources of Saudi Arabia, and all those who were told Islam is peace and bought it without understanding the warfare doctrine and a goal to bring Islam to the world with deception, terror and total control of the information about this goal.
Eur says
A friend was working for a few years in Saudi Arabia. During a call to prayer (I think it was during Ramadan) a morale cop beat him for not seeing him praying. My friend is European and there the Westerners are not treated as badly as the Orientals. We Westerners are slaves of the first class, unfaithful dogs call us. My friend is a bit of an idiot to go there, he went to that infected pit of Islamic fascists for money and even made Saudi friends … but he admits that Arab Muslims are totally fascist, supremacist and very very racist, even with Muslims themselves from other countries.
mgoldberg says
I don’t see where any of the muslim states have created a military force to go and capture Islamic homicidists in any country that practices violent Jihad, rape, enslavement. No where has any muslim army gone to get those nigerian girls who boko haram enslaves. It’s all the usual misdirection and deception.
Islamic mirror says
How has Islam accomplished the trick of turning any criticism, denunciation or rejection of one of the most evil and savage men to have ever lived into a crime or a “phobia”? A 7th Century barbarian somehow becomes immune from disapproval in the 21st Century?
The answer is violence, the threat of violence and deceit on a massive scale, aided and abetted by the complacence and “progressive” virtue seeking that now plagues our societies.
The Cult of Islam has nearly succeeded in turning morality upside down and will be victorious unless we wake up to reality very soon.
anyone in doubt has to do is READ only chapters 2 to 9 of Muhammad’s Quran and watch the repeated mass slaughter of unarmed innocent European, American, Russian, Indian, Chinese, Iraqi etc. civilians by Muslims proclaiming they are doing the butchery to PLEASE their demonic god Allah
Insult to Islam/Blasphemer
Of course no one says exactly what the accused person said that so insulted Islam. How accused insulted a DEAD MAN so disrespectfully he/she should spent years in prison for it.
You just have to take their word that it was something really really bad. No, the writer can’t repeat it, then writer would be in trouble. Of course, they can’t repeat it in court, then the lawyers would be in trouble. So, for accused gets to go to prison where accused may never come out alive (he’s now a “blasphemer”), going to prison in like the rape victims jailed for admitting to fornication by crying rape.
the poor soul being led away by the thought police for somehow offending the Muslims (or just been accused of it by someone out to get him). Kind of like Pakistan without the mountain views. Only Islam in the modern world is so brittle and insecure as to require legal penalties for hurt feelings.
Islam doesn’t need any help. It’s insulting enough on it’s own:
Koran 2:191 “slay the unbelievers wherever you find them”
Koran 3:21 “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends”
Koran 5:33 “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam”
Koran 8:12 “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran”
Koran 8:60 ” Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels”
Koran 8:65 “The unbelievers are stupid, urge all Muslims to fight them”
Koran 9:5 “When the opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you find them”
Koran 9:123 “Make war on the infidels living in your neighbourhood”
Koran 22:19 “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies”
Koran 47:4 “Do not hanker for peace with the infidels, behead them when you catch them”.
In the enlightened West, people aren’t arrested or jailed for criticizing Muhammad. They’re just excoriated as racist, bigoted Islamophobes, and shunned by all decent people, and concerted efforts are made to deny them access to all means of communication. Everyone the world over agrees that Muhammad, alone of all human beings, must never be criticized.
The koranic verses above are their own best testimony as to why muslims are waging jihad against us in all its ugly forms. Their “holy” scriptures teach bigotry and hate, and their deeds and actions are the material manifestation of those bad teachings. That’s why islam is an evil influence that needs to be eradicated. It’s a detriment to our peace and freedoms, and a real-world threat to the future prosperity of all mankind.
Islam teaches some really nasty, nasty stuff
Here’s a way for readers to see how “peaceful” Islam is from the comfort of their own home and learn it’s sinister truth
8:39 “fight till all religion is for allah” IE. until all people are Muslim
9:5 “when sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists” Islam considers Christianity polytheists
9:29
4:89 “if they turn away (from Islam) kill them”
2:191 “and kill them wherever you overtake them, such is recompense of disbelievers (non-Muslims)”
8:67 “it is not for a prophet to have captives of war (slaves) until he inflicts a slaughter upon the land”
47:4 “when you meet disbeliever (non-Muslim) strike neck” see 8:39 above Islam is at war with all
5:51. “take no Jew or Christian as an ally”
9:30
3:151
8:12 “cast TERROR into hearts of disbelievers, so strike their necks & strike every fingertip”
8:60 “prepare whatever steeds of war you are able that you may TERRIFY enemies of allah” non-Muslims
9:111
13:41
7:175
5:33
4:25
24:2
37:88
38:31
47:35 “do not seek peace while you are superior”
Etc#
the Copts and other Christians in Dar-al-Islam are violently persecuted. This happens in *every* Muslim-majority country.
Christians are facing full genocide in places like Pakistan and Iraq.
In Egypt and other Islamic countries, it is way of life. Muslims are FULL of hate. The Copts are extremely peaceful people. Despite all the horrible atrocities committed by Muslims against them, they did not ever raise a hand against a Muslim. However, this did not help to soften the extreme hate in the Muslims’ hearts planted by Mohammad in the evil Koran. It is about time to declare Islam is NOT a religion, because it is not.
(Among all the claims Muslims make about their religion at least one of them is absolutely true; nothing has been changed since Muhammad’s first revelation. In an unbroken chain Muslims have been emulating their prophet, as instructed to do by Allah in the Quran. Muhammad had people killed over insults and was not troubled if innocent people, who had some association with the original “criminal”, were also killed.
To riot, burn and loot against perceived blasphemers and their friends and neighbors is 100% pure Islam. And it doesn’t even matter if the alleged blasphemy was a factually correct statement. Some countries will always be poor and their citizens uneducated. These are the countries where Shariah underpins every law. It is not possible for an intelligent, creative or ambitious person to be who they are in such a country. Where the voice of reason has been criminalized the gap is filled by angry, self-righteous mobs.
All of the destruction, death and looting are, in their minds, celebrated by Allah. So they get to hurt people and take their stuff without remorse which makes Islam the preferred religion for ignorant sociopaths. (DRHazard)
underbed cat says
Islamic mirror impressive comment with all the details, history, examples and .the truth backed up with sura’s……commands to terrorize and embed the educated in American culture to influence, it takes time, patience, money, a plan and deception to accomplish. But it does not stay silent forever as it reaches it marker goals called milestones the demands increase, sporadic terror rises, denial ensues and numbers multiply enough to gain political power and subvert another government. We cannot let this happen.
Infidel says
RED HOT TAQIYYA ALERT!!!!
Sharyati says
So Mr OIC chief, you will be abrogating all the violent verses in the Quran with the earlier peaceful ones? The verse of the sword has ceased to exist and Muslims will no longer follow Al-Wala Wal-Baraa?You downright lyiing hypocrite!!! You think we are fools to fall for this type of Taqaiyya?
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Sharyati, thé Quran Abrogated Idol worships of durga/Dharma,pagan christianity of Godman and begotten son of God and jewish hero gods of yahweh and his wife Ashera, all inspired by thé Satan.
LeftisruiningCanada says
And yet Jesus Christ raped, murdered nor enslaved anyone. He also didn’t tell us to bow down to a rock.
I know who looks more ‘inspired by satan” to me…can you guess who i’m thinking of?
gravenimage says
What doesn’t Ibrahim itace muhammed believe was “inspired by thé Satan”?
Well, raping little girls and mass-slaughtering innocent people, to start with.
LeftisruiningCanada says
“the OIC head said those who perpetrated suicide attacks against civilians did not represent the faith of Islam”
But who is a civilian and who is not, mr muslim?
Islamic mirror says
where does in the quran Allah orders muslims to kill non-muslims
(Could you cite Quranic evidences or other prophetic statement where it clearly states that in Islam Muslims must kill unarmed or innocent civilians please. Produce very clear statements)
Where there’s a Muslim, there’s suffering.
(big reward given to murders by their God, for murdering God’s creation).
• Devout Muslims recite the Fatiha 17 times a day, rejecting of Christians and Jews; The Fatiha (sura 1 of the Qur’an) states:
“Guide us to the straight path, the path of those upon whom You have bestowed favor, not of those who have evoked [Your] anger or of those who are astray.
The traditional Islamic understanding of this is that the “straight path” is Islam. The path of those who have earned Allah’s anger are the Jews, and those who have gone astray are the Christians.
The influential Sunni scholar Ibn Kathir explained this passage in this way:“
The two paths He described here are both misguided…the two paths are the paths of the Christians and Jews, a fact that the believer should beware of so that he avoids them. The path of the believers is knowledge of the truth and abiding by it. In comparison, the Jews abandoned practicing the religion, while the Christians lost the true knowledge. This is why ‘anger’ descended upon the Jews, while being described as ‘led astray’ is more appropriate of the Christians
Ibn Kathir’s understanding of this passage is not a lone “extremist” interpretation. In fact, most Muslim commentators believe that the Jews are those who have earned Allah’s wrath and the Christians are those who have gone astray. This is the view of Tabari, Zamakhshari, the Tafsir al-Jalalayn, the Tanwir al-Miqbas min Tafsir Ibn Abbas, and Ibn Arabi, as well as Ibn Kathir. One contrasting, but not majority view, is that of Nisaburi, who says that “those who have incurred Allah’s wrath are the people of negligence, and those who have gone astray are the people of immoderation.”
But that “divisiveness” that every practicing Muslim engages in by saying those five daily prayers, and cursing Jews and Christians, is only one small part of the hostility toward Unbelievers that Islam inculcates. There are at least 109 verses that command Muslims to engage in Jihad warfare against the Infidels; they are unambiguous in their meaning.
• Quran 2:191 -“And slay them wherever ye catch them.” Qur’an 2:191..
“Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.” Quran 2:191 , has neither limit nor expiration date.
Actual verse (Surah Al-Baqarah [2:191] – Al-Qur’an al-Kareem: And kill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and fitnah is worse than killing. And do not fight them at al-Masjid al- Haram until they fight you there. But if they fight you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.)
“Kill them wherever you find them.”
btw ur verse is here Quran (2:191-193) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing..
(And slay them wherever you come upon them, and expel them from where they expelled you; persecution is more grievous than slaying. But fight them not by the Holy Mosque until they should fight you there; then, if they fight you, slay them — such is the recompense of unbelievers, but if they give over, surely Allah is All-forgiving, All-compassionate. Fight them, till there is no persecution and the religion is Allah’s; then if they give over, there shall be no enmity save for evildoers. (Quran 2:191-193)
2:191-193: “And kill them wherever you come upon them, and expel them from where they expelled you; persecution is worse than slaughter. But do not fight them by the holy mosque until they should fight you there; then, if they fight you, kill them — such is the recompense of unbelievers, but if they give over, surely Allah is all-forgiving, all-compassionate. Fight them, till there is no persecution and the religion is Allah’s; then if they give over, there shall be no hatred except for evildoers.”
“They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah. But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper.” (Quran 4:89; and again in 2:191 and 9:5)
“And when the inviolable months have passed, then kill the polytheists (Pagans & Christians) wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.” (Quran 9:5).
>> “Or, pour petrol over their houses while they’re asleep and engulf their houses with flames.”…
“And how many cities have We destroyed, and Our punishment came to them at night or while they were sleeping at noon.” (Q 7:4). Punishment? For not accepting Muhammad’s malevolent madness.
the violent aspirations of islam. It’s a bizarre contradiction hard to understand.,” they are facilitators of islam’s violent doctrines that muslims accept as divine truth. that makes all faithful muslims willing participants in the violence terrorists do, because they provide those terrorists with all the religio-political support they could ever need to justify their actions. The only thing that separates the violent muslims from the peaceful ones are the ludicrous denials and obfuscations about their mutual support for each other–religiously, ideologically, legally, and morally
gravenimage says
OIC chief: “There can be no justification for any violent action and killing under the pretext of Islam”
…………………..
What a load of Taqiyya.
Here’s more from the dishonest Dr. Yousef Al-Othaimeen:
“Al-Othaimeen: Counter Terrorism Strategies Should be Compliant with International Human Rights Laws”
http://www.oic-cdpu.org/en/topic/?tID=1317
“Counter terrorism measures like illegal and arbitrary detentions, extrajudicial killings, racial and ethnic profiling, and illegal settlements etc. pose serious challenges to human rights and the rule of law,” said Al-Othaimeen.
“Such measures foster an atmosphere of mistrust, resentment and marginalization in a manner that diminishes States’ long- term security. Such counter- terrorism measures also disproportionately impact certain populations, including ethnic or religious minorities and migrants, which undermines social cohesion and intensifies radicalisation and violence,” he added.
…
This last is a dig at Israel, of course.
And what he is saying is that if you dare notice that it is Muslims waging Jihad terrorism, that this means you are creating more Jihad terror. How often have we heard *this* crap?
He goes on to say, “the OIC is cognizant of the threats to and infringements of basic human rights in the counter terrorism policies and practices. It firmly rejects the identification of terrorism with any nationality or religion and has always highlighted the necessity of addressing the conditions that foster terrorism by promoting human rights, tolerance and multiculturalism and tackling negative socio- economic factors.”
In other words, Jihad terror is th fault of the victims not being tolerant and multicultural enough…
Hilariously, he also “commended the OIC Independent Permanent Human Rights Commission, for doing ‘a great job in promoting human rights within OIC.’”
Of course, Muslim countries have the worst human rights records in the world–but he hopes that his readers have not noticed that…
MFritz says
Words are cheap.
FYI says
I don’t think his “prophet” muhammed would agree..
“I am made victorious THROUGH TERROR”
bukhari 4:52:220
There’s also the slight problem of Mo’s mass-murdering of Jews in the name of the god “allah” and islam
{“The Religion of peace”}
Abu Dawud 4390