London mayor Sadiq Khan has attacked Home Secretary Sajid Javid for “playing to the far right narrative” with a tweet he sent following the sentencing of a grooming gang in Huddersfield. Mr Javid tweeted after a gang of 20 men were sentenced on October 19; “These sick Asian paedophiles are finally facing justice. I want to commend the bravery of the victims. For too long, they were ignored. Not on my watch. There will be no no-go areas.”
Sadiq Khan severely criticised the Home Secretary’s comments, consigning him to the outer darkness by comparing his tweet’s language to that used by Donald Trump. He told LBC: “It’s quite clear now that there are Conservative politicians who think the way to succeed in the Conservative Party is by playing to the far-right narrative. There was no need, in my opinion, to insert the words ‘Asian’ in that tweet, or ”no-go areas.’ The sort of people who use the phrase ‘no-go areas’ are Donald Trump – he used it in the context of London and even Boris Johnson rebutted him when he said that – and also the EDL and far-right groups.”
First, the phrase “no-go areas” has been used not just by Donald Trump and others (all of course right-wing, far-right, alt-right) whom Sadiq Khan despises, but by many local leaders, police officials, scholars, and writers in Europe to describe the situation in their own cities and towns.
In France, for example, as Soeren Kern wrote in 2015:
Fabrice Balanche, a well-known French Islam scholar who teaches at the University of Lyon, recently told Radio Télévision Suisse: “You have territories in France such as Roubaix, such as northern Marseille, where police will not step foot, where the authority of state is completely absent, where mini Islamic states have been formed.”
French writer and political journalist Éric Zemmour recently told BFM TV: “There are places in France today, especially in the suburbs, where it is not really in France. Salafi Islamists are Islamizing some neighborhoods and some suburbs. In these neighborhoods, it’s not France, it’s an Islamic republic.” In a separate interview, Zemmour — whose latest book is entitled, “The French Suicide” — says multiculturalism and the reign of politically correct speech is destroying the country.
French politician Franck Guiot wrote that parts of Évry, a township in the southern suburbs of Paris, are no-go zones where police forces cannot go for fear of being attacked. He said that politicians seeking to maintain “social peace” were prohibiting the police from using their weapons to defend themselves.
The Socialist mayor of Amiens, Gilles Demailly, has referred to the Fafet-Brossolette district of the city as a “no-go zone” where “you can no longer order a pizza or get a doctor to come to the house.” Europe 1, one of the leading broadcasters in France, has referred to Marseille as a “no-go zone” after the government was forced to deploy riot police, known as CRS, to confront warring Muslim gangs in the city. The French Interior Ministry said it was trying to “reconquer” 184 square kilometers (71 square miles) of Marseille that have come under the control of Muslim gangs.
The French newspaper Le Figaro has referred to downtown Perpignan as a “veritable no-go zone” where “aggression, antisocial behavior, drug trafficking, Muslim communalism, racial tensions and tribal violence” are forcing non-Muslims to move out. Le Figaro also reported that the Les Izards district of Toulouse was a no-go zone, where Arab drug trafficking gangs rule the streets in a climate of fear.
Sadiq Khan may want to consult, on the subject of “no-go zones” in France, two reports:
A 120-page research paper entitled “No-Go Zones in the French Republic: Myth or Reality?” documented dozens of French neighborhoods “where police and gendarmerie cannot enforce the Republican order or even enter without risking confrontation, projectiles, or even fatal shootings.”
In October 2011, a 2,200-page report, “Banlieues de la République” (Suburbs of the Republic) found that Seine-Saint-Denis and other Parisian suburbs are becoming “separate Islamic societies” cut off from the French state and where Islamic Sharia law is rapidly displacing French civil law. Since 2011, hundreds more much areas, where the representatives of the French state — police, firemen — hesitate to enter, have been identified.
France is not the only European country with No-Go Zones, but it is the country where no-go zones have been subject to the most study. Parts of London, Birmingham, Manchester, Brussels, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague, Berlin, Malmö and Stockholm are places where the police seem to have lost control. The Hungarian government has released a report.
Sadiq Khan insists there was “no need” for Sajid Javid to mention “no-go zones.” But Javid was trying to present a picture of where these grooming gangs flourish, often out of sight of the police, who are hesitant to enter such areas.
Is anything Sajid Javid said untrue? Were not all 20 of the men who were convicted in Huddersfield “Asians” — a word which has been used for decades in the U.K. to avoid identifying people forthrightly as British Pakistanis, though everyone knows what the word is meant to convey: Muslims of Pakistani origin. Sadiq Khan thinks identifying the groomers in this way is unacceptable, though he fails to explain why. Why is it wrong to identify the religion and ethnicity shared by all of these groomers in Huddersfield? Can he imagine why it might be useful for the public — and parents of daughters — to know?
Nor were these “Asian” groomers limited to Huddersfield. In the most publicized of such cases, dozens of other groomers have been tried and convicted for the sexual exploitation, and repeated rape, of 1,510 English girls in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013. Still other “Asian” — that is, British-Pakistani — men have been tried and convicted for the same offenses in more than two dozen British cities. Their preferred victims were girls aged 12 to 14. The modus operandi was for the men to wait outside schools and care homes, sometimes in taxis (for many were taxi drivers), to engage these young girls in conversation, to show an interest in these vulnerable girls — often from poor and dysfunctional families — that few, of none, had done before, and then to inveigle them into sexual relationships. Then they would be taken to houses where they were first plied with alcohol and drugs, and then sexually abused, repeatedly, by groups of men, passed around like party favors to still other men.
Raja says
How dare Sadiq express his Islamic view when the matter has been spoken truthfully by Sajid?
More than 70% of the Muslim population might concur with Sadiq. The wolrld is ruled by Satan through sharia
mortimer says
NAME-CALLING IS THE ONLY TECHNIQUE REMAINING FOR THE LEFTISH ISLAM-SUPPORTING GLOBALISTS … They cannot defend JIHAD TERRORISM with rational ideas. Name-calling is NOT an argument, but agitation-propaganda.
TERRORIST-DEFENDER Sadiq Khan calls anyone who disagrees with him ‘far right’ regardless of their political beliefs. Stalin similarly called everyone who disagreed with him ‘a fascist’. For Stalin, Leon Trotsky was ‘a fascist’. All Trotsky’s family were also ‘fascists’. All Trosky’s friends and supporters (100% communists) were called ‘FASCISTS’ by Stalin.
Sadiq Khan is basically doing the same thing … when he calls EVERY OPPONENT of his ‘far-right’, he is suggesting every one of his critics is a HITLERITE. This slander is simply evil.
FYI says
It could have been worse:Sajid Javid didn’t say… MUSLIMS.
He said “These sick Asian pedophiles”
It’s much easier to say “ASIANS” than MUSLIMS.
And these mysterious ASIANS?Who are they..?
Chinese?Japanese?Koreans?Indians??…Hindus,Taoists,Buddhists etc?
Well we don’t have serious problems with these ASIANS.
But we DO have problems with MUSLIMS:but it is SO much easier for the media to try to hide this by using that all-embracing term “ASIANS”.
Otherwise they might be accused of being racist and islamophobic:so it is better to call MUSLIM rape gangs,ASIAN rape gangs.
There!Problem solved….
katherine says
The English language itself has been hijacked by the MSM – these Pakistanis and Indians are Caucasians.
Where are their Mongoloid Asian features ? Just look at those mug-shots.
Michael Copeland says
Dickens, in his day, wrote of the Circumlocution Office.
Obviously it is alive and well.
D says
I agrre 100 percent with you. Unfortunate one English daily calls these Muslim rapists as ASIAN.
mortimer says
ASIANS??? Which “ASIANS”?
Hmmm … how about “the ASIANS that have 50 generations of INBREEDING FROM COUSIN MARRIAGES” ??
Is that a sufficient hint?
Jayell says
“How dare Sadiq express his Islamic view when the matter has been spoken truthfully by Sajid?”
Javid has his eye on the job at No. 10, so he will parrot the majority opinion in order to maintain a public image of himself that is acceptable to the masses….until, that is, he manages to get himself into office. Since he is a muslim, I believe the technical term is ‘taqqyia’. The ironic thing is the Khan himself usually plays the same game, as can be evidenced by the deadpan delivery of his all-too-frequent ‘politically acceptable’ public statements, as if he were just reading from a script and not communicating his own thinking (sic); the giveaway is the frequent stumblings and errors in his delivery as he loses his place in the wording of the narrative. Khan has seriously shot himself in the foot here because he has allowed his mask to slip (as indeed he did previously with his ‘Uncle Tom’ comment), but this apparent negligence may be due to a false sense of security since he may have assumed that he achieved security in office due to the continued fawning from certain quarters of the poltical fraternity and MSM despite his absolutely appalling track record as Mayor of London – one gets the impression that he may feel that he is untouchable and he can now do and say as he pleases without consequence. What the gullible masses fail to comprehend is that Javid is probably following the same strategy appropos No.10 that Khan followed in order to get himself into City Hall. The huge problem here is that the current ‘presidential’ role of the Prime Minister, with the power to hire and fire and dictate national policy, will allow Javid to do as Khan is doing now, by which time it may be too late to stop the rot. We need only observe the apparent impossibilty of shifting a comparitive lightweight like Therea May to predict what might happen in the future, especially with the current extent of islamic influence in the UK establishment.
infidel says
Sadiq is that typical Islamic political pest which worms its way deep into the power woodwork of the host infidel society by hook or crook, playing the race/minority/Islamophobia cards and of course the huge enticing bloc votes of the Islamic community. Hard work is not the characteristic of this worm. It will be ALL TALK and NO ACTION. so typical of its kind… and of course the habitual lying and cheating and deceiving..
Thomas Arthur says
How come this evil Muslim Sadiq still in his position no idea!!! By now he must be thrown out from his office.
Clive Stephen Delmonte says
I have always liked Mr Sadiq Khan, but that is different from believing that he understands anything about Islamic culture and practices.
mortimer says
Delmonte, did you know that Khan was a defender of jihad terrorists?
https://youtu.be/3ZM6ujJ983c
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Mortimer.
Cicero says
Delmonte
Did you know that the first act and statement Sadie Khan undertook was to go on tour abroad and declare that he was a Muslim? Not talk about what strategies he would implement to keep London at the cutting edge of Global Devlopment but to hyperventilate the fact that he was a Muslim.
Also when he was successful as the Labour contender for the post of London Mayor an advantage he achieved with the full and public support from Jeremy Corbyn, he immediately distanced himself from Mr Corbyn and was quite arrogant in his stance toward Corbyn.
It was interesting therefore to read that at this year’s summer Labour Party conference Sadiq Khan was denied the opportunity to be a main speaker athe conference
jayell says
Now, here’s a funny thing. Khan was proclaiming himslef an ‘agnostic’ before he got himself elected. So when was the sudden conversion back to islam, because he never told the media aboiut it!
pragmatist says
How can you ‘like’ a supporter of Jihad?ppppppppppppppppppppppr
alex Reid says
Javid is a Muslim & trying to be “our friend”. He didn’t say Muslim or Pakistani Grooming Gangs. Lumping this feral scum in with Chinese, Hindus, Sikhs etc. I would like to see him on a Tv Programme & asked the question, “would he like to see Sharia Law established throughout the UK.?” his response would be interesting if you get a straight answer. As for Khan, he is an odious little sh*t!! Enough said on him. The Politicians, the Authorities simply haven’t got the guts to do what is necessary to face up to this anarchy they’ve permitted to flourish. They simply cannot take the real tough decisions as they’ve never really faced anything. always looking for the PC wishy-washy way out. They’re like kippers: 2-faced & gutless!
mortimer says
NEWS FLASH for Sajid Javid : “These sick Asian paedophiles” get their ideas from a SICK ARABIAN WARLORD and PAEDOPHILE.
Do you see the connection, Sajid. WE SEE THE CONNECTION between the sick Asian paedophiles and the Arabian EXEMPLAR whom they call ‘The Perfect Man’.
Their ‘Perfect Man’ was undoubtedly a PAEDOPHILE.
balam says
VERY WELL PUT ,Mortimer !!!
CogitoErgoSum says
According to the Wikipedia article on Sajid Javid he said the following during his election campaign in 2010:
My own family’s heritage is Muslim. Myself and my four brothers were brought up to believe in God, but I do not practise any religion. My wife is a practising Christian and the only religion practised in my house is Christianity.”
I do not take his words now concerning “sick Asian pedophiles” as being any reason to doubt his honesty in the matter — though I do still believe actions speak louder than words. Also, his words in 2010 could be interpreted to mean that he’s a Muslim, just not a practicing Muslim — and his ideas about practicing or not practicing his religion could change at any time, but then, so could anybody’s.
WorkingClassPost says
Agree with CES, it’s impossible to do anything more than accept what Javid says at face value.
He has also started an inquiry into the ‘Cultural drivers’ behind the rape gangs:-
https://www.rt.com/uk/437508-sex-abuse-grooming-gangs/
So I’m cautiously optimistic that things might be moving in the right direction, but talk is cheap, and whether it proves to be a turning point or another white-wash, remains to be seen.
Michael Copeland says
“‘Cultural drivers’ behind the rape gangs”.
TRANSLATION: keep the spotlight off Islam: focus on the “cultural”.
Remember the obliging Lancashire detective (white English) assuring the press that a case of muslim daughter-killing was not an Islamic matter (which it was) but a “cultural” practice of rural Pakistan.
Dawne says
Nobody, but nobody in British politics or the MSM states “Pakistani heritage gangs” when these crimes are reported. Much of the time the ethnicity is not even mentioned as “Asian”. I listened to 2 different radio shows in the car this afternoon – Classic FM and BBC Local Radio and when the item about the sentencing at Leeds Crown Court today was on the news, neither the ethnicity (not even “Asian”) nor the names of the criminals was mentioned on either station. There was a subsequent item on the BBC station about a crime of “threatening behaviour” (bear in mind this is a Suffolk BBC local station and we don’t have that much serious crime here) and the name was given in full (and was clearly a white British man). So I think Javid saying “Asian” is quite a big deal to be honest. I agree though that he wouldn’t bother saying it if he didn’t have an eye on May’s job.
Paul says
Agreed. It is improper for Sajiv Javid to refer to to Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs as ‘Asians’ This unfairly taints millions of law abiding Chinese, Indian, Burmese, Hindu, Buddhist, Confucian British citizens who are not gang rapists or thugs or a threat to anyone. Javid should issues a correction and call a spade a spade.
James Lincoln says
Any time that Sadiq Khan is offended, somebody is doing something right.
dan christenen says
London mayor Sadiq Khan has of course, as a pakistani muslim, been brainwashed and groomed to do and say what he does. His sayings mirrors at the bottom line always fundamental islamic dogma. He was born that way, to the detriment of the dumbstruck London population.
Adrian Molenkamp says
….to the detriment of the dumbstruck London population, that voted him into office.
Malcolm Jackson says
“These sick Asian paedophiles are finally facing justice. I want to commend the bravery of the victims. For too long, they were ignored. Not on my watch. There will be no no-go areas.”
Should be ““These sick MUSLIM paedophiles are finally …..”
Marina says
When is Sadiq Khan going to be voted out! I wonder what were the British people thinking when they elected a muzzie.
Anne Smith says
He was voted in by the population of London some of whom who thought they were voting for a Labour candidate and the rest are imported immigrants just like him and they have a vote and are;using it to make sure Muslims are getting all the jobs they can in Government and local Councils to influence and control our society.
Terry Gain says
Would Khan (or the Pope) propose that we refer to Catholic Priests engaged in pedophilia as Religious Ministers.
christianblood says
+1
lisalles says
England voted this guy in and only England can vote this guy out. Until then, keep your daughters inside your homes. Find different news sources.
Tony Pearson says
These two could not be further apart. I live near Javid’s constituency in the UK and have only spoken to him once but it was clear to me that in practice he is an ex-muslim. He’s a politician so he does not loudly announce it. Let’s face it, he could probably attract some votes from ‘asians’ who are horrified by the grooming gangs. Khan should be saying what Javid says but he doesn’t, and that reveals a lot about them. His effective abandonment of Islam also helps explain why Javid had no qualms about withdrawing any objections to the US dealing with British terrorist suspects.. He is . Politically, he is a small government, individual rights advocate, very pro-Israel and belongs to the Friends of Israel group within the Conservative party. It’s also interesting that he is one of the few UK top politicians that does not attack Donald Trump. I suppose in US terms he is close to libertarian Republican or Ayn Randian. When he goes to the US he reularly speaks at the American Enterprise Institute. Watch his progress – he is currently behind Boris Johnson but is definitely a prime minister contender. If he was PM he would certainly clear the UK swamp and that would include Sadiq Khan.
jayell says
I am getting the impression that the UK High Street Intellogentsia is full of cock-eyed liberal optimists who see what they want to see and believe ‘the best’ (their idea of ‘the best’, that is) about whoever is trotted out in front of them (usually by the BBC). Sadly, this involves closing their eyes to what might be glaringly obvious or what is loosely concealed under the surface, yet they would continue to argue that ‘black’ is ‘white’ and vociferously denigrate anyone who tries to say otherwise.
Fatts says
This is funny.
Not satisfied with British enforcement of blasphemy laws, Khan hits Javid for saying “Asian” and “no go”.
Apparently, rape gangs are supposed to be part and parcel of of living in a city, just like mass murder jihad attacks, according to Khan.
Joe says
By defending them, Khan is aligning with them and approving of rape and jihad. We know that he is for rape and jihad, because he defends them. How is it that women vote for the defender of rape?
Fatts says
I should add what some of you are already thinking. These 2 are in competition…to be the first muslim P.M. of the U.K.
A sobering thought?
FYI says
It reminds me a bit of that well know Law Enforcement trick;Good cop-Bad cop.
They are actually both on the SAME side and they want the accused to incriminate himself to make their job easier.
Perhaps the islamic equivalent would be:
Mr Tawriya-Mr Taqqiya.
Using dissembling to fool the easily-deceived sheeple:They are both on the same religious side.And Indeed,if a muslim wanted to get elected,he might perhaps appeal to non-muslims by saying that he opposes sharia law..then he would be a “moderate” muslim to them…neat trick!
Carol the 1st says
I can’t forget the slap-in-the-face picture of Theresa May flanked by Javid and Khan right at the time of the Tommy Robinson March. Articles indicated that both muslims would undoubtedly be contending for the Prime Minister position.
Having a Christian wife and raising the children as Christians adds a curious element – but doesn’t it seem a little too convenient?
Fatts says
“You have territories in France such as Roubaix, such as northern Marseille, where police will not step foot, where the authority of state is completely absent, where mini Islamic states have been formed.”
Indeed. That is now the modus operandi. Form a mini Islamic State, confident it will grow over time, in all likelihood.
High fertility rates force the mini Islamic State to grow, as new families seek new apartments etc.
The degree to which sharia is enforced and observed in these areas would probably shock even some of those who don’t deny their existence.
Jean says
Javid is merely making this statement at this moment to place a smokescreen before the fact that Tommy Robinson was unjustly imprisoned a month after Javid became Home Secretary; and that the order to move Robinson from a relatively safe prison to HMP Onley (with a large percentage of violent Muslims) came directly from the Home Secretary’s office.
Now that Robinson has not been re-imprisoned, and has gained a large additional following, including in the British military, Javid is trying to get under this group’s radar. To deflect a focused examination, or criticism, of his own position.
Khan can then comfortably supplement Javid with a more Islamic response to comfort the Muslim population, signalling that they are not being let down by their fellow Muslims in power.
Not a bad strategy, adapted to circumstance. But the rat still smells.
Carol the 1st says
It sure makes you wonder:
Definition of tag team
1 : a team of two or more professional wrestlers who spell each other during a match
2 : two or more people working in association toward the same goal —usually hyphenated when used attributively
BTW. Steve Turley’s video re Tommy’s tour is great news!
Lydia Church says
Then I will attack Sadiq Khan for ‘playing to the far left narrative’ and attacking Home Secretary Sajid Javid for speaking the truth!
Raja says
This same evil Sadiq justified killing of Lee Rigby. It was as though he was setting the rules for Islamic killing of infidels, which can be anything grotesque and sickening to the stomach.
The sharia-compliant/seeking zealots are always combatants for Islam and never ashamed for the same. The numb world, especially the Left is silent on these matters. Shame on them for their immorality and double standards…
gravenimage says
Hugh Fitzgerald: Sajid Javid’s Tweet Horrifies Sadiq Khan (Part One)
“These sick Asian paedophiles are finally facing justice. I want to commend the bravery of the victims. For too long, they were ignored. Not on my watch. There will be no no-go areas.”
…………………
So now London’s Muslim mayor is enraged if someone so much as says anything negative about pedophile rapists? Good God…
Not that I think Sajid Javid is actually all that committed to rooting out Jihad, though…
John Vic says
The Nice Attack was a Muslim
The Paris Attacks were Muslims
The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Orlando attack was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The Underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The Westminster Attack was a Muslim
The 2005 Bali Bombings were Muslims
The Murder of Lee Rigby were Muslims
The U.S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The London Bridge Attack were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Charlie Hebdo Attacks were Muslims
The San Bernadino Attacks were Muslims
The Davao Philippines Attack were Muslims
The 2018 Surabaya bombings were Muslims
The Minnesota Mall stabbings was a Muslim
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Ankara Airport Turkey Attack were Muslims
The Manchester Arena bombing was a Muslim
The Pan-Am Flight #103 Bombers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover was by Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The 2002 Bali Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The Batta Meena Pakistan Attacks were Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
The Yazidi Sinjar Massacre of 2014 were Muslims
The Beheading of the French priest were Muslims
The Buenos Aires Suicide bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The First World Trade Center bombers were Muslims
The Beheading of journalist Daniel Pearl was Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The Bombay & Mumbai Indian Attackers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims
The 1915 Armenian Genocide, where nearly 2 million were
killed in Turkey, was the Ottoman government… were Muslims
The Beheadings, stabbings, live burnings, & drownings by Muslims
The Piracy off the Barbary Coast in T. Jefferson’s time were Muslims
The June 2017 Brighton siege in Melbourne, Australia was a Muslim
The 2016 Brussels bombings in Zaventem and Maalbeek were Muslims
The Daily inhumane acts by the religion of peace, Islam = the Muslims
(Forgive this poor attempt to list all Muslim atrocities in recent history, hundreds more i can list )
Where do folks seem to act kindly toward one another?
Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
Baha’is living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
Hindus living with Baha’is = No Problem
Christians living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
Baha’is living with Christians = No Problem
Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem
Confucians living with Baha’is = No Problem
Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
Where in the world does the poo always seem to hit the fan?
Muslims living with Jews = Problem
Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
Muslims living with Baha’is = Problem
Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
Muslims living with Atheists = Problem
Muslims living with Christians = Problem
Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
Muslims living with other Muslims = Problem
So what are some Muslim Social Clubs?
ISIS: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Ansaru: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hamas: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Taliban: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Badr: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Nusra: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Qaeda: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hezbollah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abu Sayyaf: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Boko Haram: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Islamic Jihad: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Lashkar-e-Taiba: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Jemaah Islamiyah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Muslim Brotherhood: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Palestine Liberation Front: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abdullah Azzam Brigades: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Moro Islamic Liberation Front: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION, etc.
Islam = Muhammad & the Koran
Don’t conflate Islam with Muslims. When we talk about Islam, we are not talking about how Muslims behave.
We are talking about Muhammad and the Koran. Muslims can act any way they wish, and they do.
But Islam does NOT change. There is no such thing as moderate Islam.
There is no moderate Islam, there are moderate muslims, but no moderate Islam, there is only one Islam.
People who are reading the Koran literally, are not interpreting the Koran, they are following the Koran.
In other words, the people who are, or claim to be, “moderate” Muslims, are interpreting the Koran.
But those Muslims who kill and terrorise in the name of Allah and Islam, are following the Koran literally.
And those violent beliefs are much more common than Muslims would like people to know.
There are three kinds of muslims:
1) The muslim who lives in an Islam dominant society, is muslim because to be otherwise would mean certain death.
2) The western world muslim who wanted to be part of something, so became muslim, but has no clue what Islam really teaches.
3) The ACTUAL muslim, who spends their lives subjugating or attempting to subjugate others because they understand that this is exactly what Muhammad taught is the duty of all muslims.
———————————————————————-
Is radical Islam, in the Muslim world, a minority? To answer that we need to define our terms. We’re not talking about people who are active terrorists, radical beliefs are a lot broader than terrorists. But terrorists draw their moral, financial and religious support from those who are not terrorists themselves, SO WHERE ARE THE RADICALS?
All these stats are from PEW research:
Indonesia, the most populous Muslim country, with 205 million Muslims, 50% support strict sharia law, 70% blame the U.S. or Isreal for 9/11, THAT’S 143 MILLION PEOPLE WHO ARE RADICALISED.
Egypt, 80 million Muslims, 65% want strict sharia law in every Islamic country, 70% had positive feelings about Bin Laden, THAT’S 55.2 MILLION MORE RADICALS.
Pakistan has 179 million Muslims, 76% want strict sharia law in all Islamic countries, THAT’S ANOTHER 135.4 MILLION RADICALS.
Bangladesh, 149 million Muslims, over a quarter said suicide bombings or targeting of civilians was sometimes justified, 82% want sharia law and two thirds say honor killings of women can sometimes be justified, THAT’S 121.9 MILLION MORE RADICALS.
Nigeria, 79.7 million Muslims, 71% favour sharia law, THAT’S 53.7 MILLION MORE RADICALS.
Iran, 74.8 million Muslims, 83% favour implementation of sharia law, THAT’S 62.1 MILLION MORE RADICALS.
Turkey, 74.7 million Muslims, 32% said honor killings could sometimes be justified, THAT’S 23.9 MILLION MORE RADICALS.
Morocco, 32.4 million Muslims, over 3 quarters support sharia law, THAT’S 24.6 MILLION MORE RADICALS.
Iraq, 31.1 million Muslims, 78% say honor killings of women can sometimes be justified, THAT’S 24.3 MILLION MORE RADICALS.
Afghanistan, 24 million people, 76% support honor killing of women, 99% want sharia law as law of their land, THAT’S 24 MILLION MORE RADICALS.
Jordan, 6.4 million Muslims, where Hamas has a 60% approval rating, THAT’S 3.8 MILLION MORE RADICALS.
Palestinian areas, where the U.S. sends hundreds of millions of dollars, 4.3 million Muslims, 89% support terrorist attacks on Isreal, 89% support sharia law, 78% have positive feelings of Bin Laden, THAT’S 3.8 MILLION MORE RADICALS.
France, 4.7 million Muslims, 35% said suicide bombings could sometimes be justified, THAT’S 1.6 MILLION MORE RADICALS.
Great Britain, 2.8 million Muslims, 78% wanted cartoonists of Muhammad legally prosecuted, THAT’S 2.2 MILLION MORE RADICALS.
United States, 2.6 million Muslims, 13% said violence against civilians can be justified, 19% are favourable toward Al-Qaida, THAT’S 500K MORE RADICAL MUSLIMS.
THAT GIVES US 680 MILLION RADICALS. Of 942 million Muslims, 72% are radicalised. So it’s fair to assume that simillar proportions of people in countries like Algeria, Syria, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Tunisia, Somalia, and Lybia are also radicalised. And if they are, that’s over 800 million Muslims who are radicalised. That’s more than half of the Muslims on earth, that’s not a minority, it is now a majority, and that’s still not even surveying hundreds of millions of Muslims in other countries. In other words, the myth of the tiny radical muslim minority, is just that, it’s a myth. And unfortunately it’s a myth that’s going to get a lot of civilised people killed.
Rufluc says
A very interesting, albeit worrying, list of statistics John Vic. A copy of this needs to be sent to every western politician. Maybe a dozen or so to Merkel herself!
It has always aggrieved me that our naive and poorly educated politicians (like Merkel) make decisions based on their ‘beliefs’ (sometimes religiously based….like Merkel), with complete and utter disregard to the interests of the people they serve. Many of these politicians (like Merkel) now have blood on their hands from all the ensuing violent and sexual attacks that have taken place as a consequence of the third world animals they’ve allowed in.
How do they sleep at night? Why aren’t they being held to account? They are directly responsible for ruining the lives of thousands of Christian and other western individuals who are mainly peace loving people. But our politicians are hell bent on swamping our countries with these barbaric heathens from the third world, irrespective of financial, cultural, societal or human cost. Mores the question, why do we keep voting the same treacherous people back into power?
I believe It’s simply because of all the left wing brain washing that has been sweeping across the West, that stops people from voting for the right wing parties that would put a stop to all this western destruction? Though recently this situation is at last changing.
The people of the West need to realise that the right is made up of people like themselves. Proud of their country, culture, beliefs and achievements. The right are not Nazis. The Nazis were socialists from the left! It is the self loathing left that is destroying the West. They hate everything about themselves, and all the prior associations they had with their own people and families. They embrace everything that will aid the destruction of the west. Yes, they are truly that sick in the head!
You only need to look at the violent actions of far left wing organisations like Antifa to see that this is true. THEY are the true fascists! We must not let them bring us down to their vile level of depravity. Learn to cast off the vile labels they so joyfully love to place on people who talk sense. The ‘R’ word being their favourite of course. And because they can’t win their pathetically shallow arguments, they use these labels to shut down any debate truly intelligent people from the right wish to discuss.
Learn to expose them for what they truly are, and don’t allow them to bring you down to their level of stupidity and lunacy, as they just love to prey on people (mainly females) who can be easily led. Which is why so many under aged girls in the UK have been so easily ‘groomed’, and why you see the majority of placard wavers welcoming in these muslim hordes of invaders are also female, despite the fact it is they that are the invaders prey!
I also applaud Sajid Jarvis (who apparently is not a practicing Muslim) for calling out the type of child abusers they were, though in my opinion the term ‘Asian men’ should not have been used but ‘Muslim men’ should have been used instead, as this more accurately describes the monsters who did these dreadful crimes.
As for SADiq Khan…every time he opens his mouth he just demonstrates to all what a pathetic excuse of a man he is. Yet again he tries to sweep under the carpet all the evil that Muslims commit in the West against Western people. He needs gotten rid of NOW! (Would they allow a Christian to become the equivalent of mayor in Riyad?…..There is no need to answer that one as the answer is so blatantly obvious! So why do WE in the West allow it? And there lies the problem!).
infidel says
Why the F is Sajid Javid USING THE MISLEADING TERM OF ASIANs when referring to these grooming gangs. He is INSULTING scores of Non-Muslim Asians like me and other Hindus who work hard and are dignified people. We have NOTHING IN COMMON with these Koranimals. And so also the other hard working Asians like Japanese, Koreans, and even Chinese Viets, Thais, Cambodians. SHAME ON JAVID TO HIDE THE CRIMES OF HIS MUSLIM COMMUNITY UNDER THE NAME OF ASIANS. But the public are not fooled anymore. JAVID MUST BE SUED for his remarks.
Carol the 1st says
Doing a quick look-up on the subject it appears that technically the Pakistanis are SOUTH ASIANS. In the past however they’ve tended to reject this categorization as it links them with India (South Asians). They don’t care to link themselves with Afghanistan as an alternative and would instead prefer to be linked up as MIDDLE EASTERNERS but this hasn’t worked out and so Pakistanis seem to be reconciling themselves to the South Asian descriptor. People farther to the east are considered FAR EAST or EAST ASIAN. In the past we would have clearly and easily defined them as Orientals but using that term seems to be considered outdated and on hold (but here’s an interesting article on that subject – http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-tsuchiyama-oriental-insult-20160601-snap-story.html )
SamB says
I don’t want to use strong language but I have say it: Sadiq Khan makes me livid… He belongs in Pakistan. I wouldn’t be surprised if he is carrying out the agenda of Pakistan. Soon if he sets foot in parliament he will be passing bills to reduce Christians to the catacombs. This man hates Christians and yet he and his family have made it into the West, now he needs to create the conditions of the Dar-al harb where it does not belong
Rufluc says
A very interesting, albeit worrying, list of statistics John Vic. A copy of this needs to be sent to every western politician. Maybe a dozen or so to Merkel herself!
It has always aggrieved me that our naive and poorly educated politicians (like Merkel) make decisions based on their ‘beliefs’ (sometimes religiously based….like Merkel), with complete and utter disregard to the interests of the people they serve. Many of these politicians (like Merkel) now have blood on their hands from all the ensuing violent and sexual attacks that have taken place as a consequence of the third world animals they’ve allowed in.
How do they sleep at night? Why aren’t they being held to account? They are directly responsible for ruining the lives of thousands of Christian and other western individuals who are mainly peace loving people. But our politicians are hell bent on swamping our countries with these barbaric heathens from the third world, irrespective of financial, cultural, societal or human cost. Mores the question, why do we keep voting the same treacherous people back into power?
I believe It’s simply because of all the left wing brain washing that has been sweeping across the West, that stops people from voting for the right wing parties that would put a stop to all this western destruction? Though recently this situation is at last changing.
The people of the West need to realise that the right is made up of people like themselves. Proud of their country, culture, beliefs and achievements. The right are not Nazis. The Nazis were socialists from the left! It is the self loathing left that is destroying the West. They hate everything about themselves, and all the prior associations they had with their own people and families. They embrace everything that will aid the destruction of the west. Yes, they are truly that sick in the head!
You only need to look at the violent actions of far left wing organisations like Antifa to see that this is true. THEY are the true fascists! We must not let them bring us down to their vile level of depravity. Learn to cast off the vile labels they so joyfully love to place on people who talk sense. The ‘R’ word being their favourite of course. And because they can’t win their pathetically shallow arguments, they use these labels to shut down any debate truly intelligent people from the right wish to discuss.
Learn to expose them for what they truly are, and don’t allow them to bring you down to their level of stupidity and lunacy, as they just love to prey on people (mainly females) who can be easily led. Which is why so many under aged girls in the UK have been so easily ‘groomed’, and why you see the majority of placard wavers welcoming in these muslim hordes of invaders are also female, despite the fact it is they that are the invaders prey!
I also applaud Sajid Jarvis (who apparently is not a practicing Muslim) for calling out the type of child abusers they were, though in my opinion the term ‘Asian men’ should not have been used but ‘Muslim men’ should have been used instead, as this more accurately describes the monsters who did these dreadful crimes.
As for SADiq Khan…every time he opens his mouth he just demonstrates to all what a pathetic excuse of a man he is. Yet again he tries to sweep under the carpet all the evil that Muslims commit in the West against Western people. He needs gotten rid of NOW! (Would they allow a Christian to become the equivalent of mayor in Riyad?…..There is no need to answer that one as the answer is so blatantly obvious! So why do WE in the West allow it? And there lies the problem!).
Rufluc says
The main thing that is wrong with all this is that there is no deterent to stop these monsters doing what they do. They treat our laws and us with total disrespect, so these vile acts will just. go on unabated. Which means an endless number of our daughters and sisters are going to end up as ‘Easy meat for these vile cretins. Whole generations are going to be mentally ruined, which will deter these poor girls from getting into any loving relationships with Western men. No doubt exactly what the barbarians want!
We need to stop all Muslims coming into the West and start deporting them back to the s**thole countries they came from! They will never change and nobody will ever know when they are telling the truth or not, because lies and deception is also what their cult teaches them to do! It is evil through and through.