Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NIFI-11920 Improve JDBC and JNDI JMS Connection URL Validation #7586

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

exceptionfactory
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

NIFI-11920 Improves JDBC and JNDI JMS connection URL validation handling and adds a driver class validator for database connection services. Changes include incorporating Expression Language evaluation to align with property descriptor support in properties that use the corresponding validator classes.

Tracking

Please complete the following tracking steps prior to pull request creation.

Issue Tracking

Pull Request Tracking

  • Pull Request title starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, such as NIFI-00000
  • Pull Request commit message starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, as such NIFI-00000

Pull Request Formatting

  • Pull Request based on current revision of the main branch
  • Pull Request refers to a feature branch with one commit containing changes

Verification

Please indicate the verification steps performed prior to pull request creation.

Build

  • Build completed using mvn clean install -P contrib-check
    • JDK 17

Licensing

  • New dependencies are compatible with the Apache License 2.0 according to the License Policy
  • New dependencies are documented in applicable LICENSE and NOTICE files

Documentation

  • Documentation formatting appears as expected in rendered files
@exceptionfactory exceptionfactory changed the title NIFI-11920 Improved JDBC and JNDI JMS Connection URL Validation Aug 9, 2023
@mattyb149
Copy link
Contributor

+1 LGTM, thanks for the improvement! Merging to main and support/nifi-1.x

@mattyb149 mattyb149 closed this in 84326ba Aug 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants