Before I get into this subject, I'd like to establish my credentials to do so (just in case anyone thinks I'm scare-mongering or making this up).
- I worked in situations of unrest, war, social chaos, etc. in the Third World (specifically sub-Saharan Africa) for a number of years, seeing at first hand what the disintegration of normal social structures and conditions can (and will) do to people.
- I've seen war and combat, both in uniform and as a civilian.
- I've worked in disaster relief, as an individual and as part of several agencies, in at least a dozen nations on two continents. I've written about some of that in these pages in the past (see, for example, "Lessons learned from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005").
- I've worked with law enforcement at local, regional and national levels in a support capacity, in two nations on two continents, for a total of almost twenty years. I retain many of the contacts I made during that time, and they keep me informed of conditions "on the ground" in their area(s), as readers will be aware from recent blog posts.
I'm drawing on all that background to write this article.
The coronavirus pandemic is already causing social unrest and deprivation in many parts of the world. For examples, click on any of these headlines:
As Reason magazine
sums up:
Unemployment, impoverishment, and despair are frightening outcomes in themselves. They're also a recipe for social unrest that will afflict even those of us who weather both the pandemic and the accompanying economic storm.
That's exactly right. I've seen precisely that happen in many nations and cities under the impact of catastrophe, whether natural or man-made. We've seen it in the USA too, many times. Consider the
looting in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina in 2005, or the impact of the blackout in New York City in 1977, summarized in this TV news report.
Former SEAL Matt Bracken wrote an article back in 2012: "
When The Music Stops – How America’s Cities May Explode In Violence". If you haven't read it before, I recommend you do so now. It may be over-the-top . . . but then again,
it may not. I've seen very similar scenarios to those he portrays in other countries, and the consequences were just as dire as he foresees (including the retaliation of those trying to defend themselves and their neighborhoods). It can happen here too: and right now, with so many people out of work, kids out of school, jobs lost, essential goods in short supply, people confined to their homes without any relief from family and other pressures, and the overall stress of a sudden, massive change in the way we live, I'm expecting social unrest in the USA in many forms. This can and will impact our personal security in many ways.
In the event of urban rioting and violence, I expect the authorities to concentrate their law enforcement efforts on what they perceive as worth defending. They will effectively abandon more violent neighborhoods (and those living in them) to their own devices, seeking instead to protect more peaceful areas from being dragged into the downward spiral. This is a cold, hard calculation based on the resources available. Each city has only so many security personnel available. If they get too thinly stretched, the only answer is to pull them back into a defensible perimeter around trouble spots and let the fires burn themselves out, so to speak. The USA is not alone in adopting that tactic. For example, a French official has effectively conceded it'll happen in some of that country's
banlieues as well, infamous as they are for their insularity and
crime levels (much like inner-city American ghettoes).
Residents of the banlieues are already disregarding quarantine regulations, and actively resisting security measures.
For that matter, many of us in the USA (but not all of us) are fortunate that we live in a reasonably stable society, with support networks available to most of those who need them. The Third World is much worse off. For example, to see what the coronavirus pandemic is doing in a city in the Philippines, read the last couple of weeks' entries on the blog "
Come and Make It". Seriously - click over there and read them. They're eye-witness accounts, straight from the horse's mouth, so to speak.
Poorer neighborhoods in some US cities are not unlike that place. I won't be surprised to see similar developments, and similar reactions.
If you live in or near a major US city, particularly one with a large homeless population and/or a serious inner-city crime problem, you need to be aware that you're at greater risk of exposure to such problems. If you doubt that, consider that
retailers in those cities are already preparing for it. (Some claim that's only because their insurance companies insist on it. Well,
why do you think they insist? Isn't it because they have a fairly good idea of what to expect?) Here are recent pictures of landmark stores in, respectively, Chicago, New York City and San Francisco. Notice anything similar?
If those stores (and/or their insurers) see good reason to prepare for trouble,
why aren't we doing what we can to prepare as well?
Consider, also, the stresses and strains on a population that's become accustomed to using recreational drugs as a "safety valve" to escape the realities of their environment.
As we've already noted, those drugs are in increasingly short supply, and becoming more expensive, too - just when people are out of work and can't afford them. That's going to be a major source of social pressure in and of itself. Addicts don't care about consequences, only about their next "fix". I'm expecting that to grow worse as time passes.
I've written extensively about emergency preparations, and about firearms and self-defense. You'll find a selection of my articles in the blog sidebar. I urge you to read those that seem relevant, and to read more widely as well. There are many voices to teach us, and much to learn. However, the first step is to analyze your own situation.
- What can you do to better protect yourself and your family against criminal predators and social unrest?
- Look at your home, your surroundings, your neighborhood. What are the risks, and where will they come from? Can you resist them from where you are, or is your position basically indefensible, requiring you to move to a safer one? If the latter, can you move to a safer place quickly if the situation gets worse? If not - for example, if intervening streets may be blocked - then consider moving now, before it's needed.
- Can you defend yourself and your loved ones? If you don't have the tools and knowledge needed to do so, it's never too late to start learning and equipping yourself. I don't mean only weapons, either. Fire extinguishers, personal protective gear like masks, gloves, etc., hard helmets to protect your head if things are being thrown, etc. - they're all useful and important.
One thing of which you need to be very cautious is forming any sort of neighborhood group for mutual self-defense. If you're in a jurisdiction where you can clear that with police, and do it with their knowledge and approval, that's good.
I was part of something like that in Louisiana in 2008, after Hurricane Gustav, and I live in a community today where self-reliance will probably be officially encouraged, if necessary. (That's one reason I live here!) However, in large cities with big populations, it's
very unlikely that law enforcement authorities will permit or tolerate anything of the kind. If you find it necessary to do that, keep it to yourself, and make sure you don't recruit Rambo types to your security team. They'll stick out like a sore thumb, make the rest of you look like uncontrolled vigilantes, and draw all sorts of unwanted attention to you, from law enforcement and criminals alike. You don't need that. Work with solid citizens who can be relied on to do only what's necessary, and not take things too far. If you don't know people like that, or not enough of them, now's the time to look for them,
before they're needed.
Remember, too, that many larger cities have technology to detect crime and respond to it. Street cameras, a
"shot-spotter" network, and other devices can pinpoint trouble and photograph those involved within a matter of seconds. That can help to keep crime under control; but if you have to defend yourself, it might also pinpoint
you as a threat. Imagine the radio call to responding officers: "Man with a gun on 23rd Street! Shots fired! Two people on the ground! Suspect is running away!" What if the suspect is you, and you've just defended yourself against two muggers, and are trying to get away from their friends? The cameras won't know that - and as a result, the police might assume you're a fleeing felon, and treat you accordingly. Be aware of those factors, and take them into account in your preparations. Try not to put yourself in a position where you become a suspect. That's not a healthy place to be!
In the final analysis,
you're the first responder for your own security and that of your family.
Do what you have to do to protect yourselves from harm. That's the bottom line. If worse comes to worst, there's always
the 3-S approach. It may not be ethical, or moral, or legal - but there may be times when there's no alternative. How do I know this? Trust me. I
know this.
Peter