Showing posts with label Children. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Children. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 3, 2024

Fireworks

 

I come from a country (South Africa) where fireworks were never a big cultural "thing".  The 5th of November (Guy Fawkes Night) was celebrated as a sort of hangover from colonial days, but not in a big way.  Dad would buy a small box of mixed fireworks, and us kids would wave sparklers enthusiastically while Roman Candles and small rockets lit up the sky over the garden - but it wasn't that big a deal to us.  It was almost exclusively a family affair, with few or no public displays of fireworks.  We didn't spend the rest of the year breathlessly waiting for the next round of bangs, booms and zooms.

Thus, when I came to this country, I was taken aback by the enthusiasm shown by almost everyone, adults and kids alike, at the prospect of converting large sums of money into smoke and (particularly) noise.  I can do that on a shooting range and get some useful practice out of it, but just blowing paper, cardboard and powder into the sky?  It simply doesn't do much for me.  Last weekend, when the town we live in held its annual July 4th fireworks display a little early, I didn't even bother to go out and look.  I did some writing at my desk, comforted the cats (who were being driven frantic by the excessive noise) and endured as patiently as possible until it was over.  I know some (a lot?) of my friends here can't figure that out.  To them, this is a highlight of the civic year, and the more noise we make, the better.  Well, I'm glad they enjoy it.

Something I could never figure out was the seemingly immense number of small fireworks stalls and outlets along the sides of local roads.  Within a couple of miles radius of my home there are at least five, all operating seasonally for major celebrations like July 4th.  A couple of weeks before the day they'll open their doors, and close them again a week afterwards, reverting to their usual status of derelict old shipping containers and garden sheds, locked up until next time.  I wondered how on earth their owners could make a living off such haphazard businesses . . . until I read Mr. B's explanation.


One of the guys that hangs around the airport works for an FBO….and his side job is managing at a Fireworks Outlet.

He was telling us that their market research tells them that the average customer spends nearly 820 dollars for the Independence Day holiday….And their average customer is on welfare or other government assistance, has 4 children, and gets some form of housing subsidy. They nearly all live below the poverty line.

Yet, oddly, they have enough money for fireworks.

He also said that the year they gave out Covid subsidy checks was the best year ever for the business.


There's more at the link.

The average customer spends $820 for Independence Day celebrations?  I don't know if that's for food and drinks as well as fireworks, but even so, ye gods and little fishes!  Those fireworks are over and above the bigger displays put on by almost all cities, towns and villages all over the country.  Around this time of year, you could fly over rural northern Texas and think you were having a flashback to World War II, with every town in sight trying to shoot down everything passing overhead!

I'm sorry.  I must be holiday-spirit-deficient in some way, because the thought of that much money being blown sky-high at this time of year - when many, many people are finding it so hard to make ends meet - is just . . . weird.

Peter


Tuesday, March 19, 2024

Of parents, inheritance, and greed

 

I could hardly believe my eyes when I read this whiny, self-centered, greedy complaint.


... my parents seem to have developed a full-on travel bug. And with every taken-on-a-whim excursion to Provence, every luxury jaunt to Thailand, New York or Costa Rica, I'm afraid to say I grow ever more resentful.

It is not a pleasant thing to admit, but the fact is their dream holidays are draining my inheritance.

As an impecunious 34-year-old millennial in an impossibly expensive property market, I am relying on, at some stage, a handout from them. But all I can see is my money receding into the distance on a long-haul trip to Bali.

With many of my friends in a similar position, and the cost of living crisis still at full throttle, the question troubling us over the generational divide is this. Who is being selfish? Us for wanting them to save their money so we can one day have it? Or them, for splurging it all so freely on themselves?

. . .

While their pensions are healthy, this level of travel is eating into their savings. Is it unbelievably awful to think of the money they spend on these trips as mine?

They had, after all, mentioned they'd divide any eventual sum between my sister and me, and I've been quietly counting on that to get a leg up.

At 34, I am still renting and living hand-to-mouth. Unlike the boomers, my generation are more used to working freelance or making do with gig economy jobs than climbing the corporate ladder in a solid job for life. Soon, AI will come for the white collar workers among us anyway.

I know that when I finally get on the property ladder, I'm going to be in so much debt that there will be no way out without help.

How can I ever settle down and give them grandchildren if there isn't any money in the pipeline to support them? Do they want to go on holiday more than they want me to be able to have and bring up children?


There's more at the link.

I'm at a loss to explain the writer's attitude.  Where on earth did he get the idea that someone else's money was actually his, by entitlement if not by actual transfer?

I can't speak for others, I guess, but I can use myself as an example.  I was raised by parents who survived the Great Depression in England in the 1930's.  My father and his younger brother were abandoned in a workhouse by their mother after their father left home, because she couldn't cope with the cost of feeding them during economic hard times.  They almost certainly hated every minute of their time there;  but they nevertheless buckled down and got on with it, because there was no alternative.  Dad joined the Royal Air Force in 1936 as a mid-teenager under the Aircraft Apprentice Scheme, and worked like a dog to pass the three-year course and become an aircraft fitter.  He then used that background and his own nose for opportunity to become a commissioned engineer officer, which saw him through World War II.  He and my mother (neither having so much as a Grade 12 school education to begin with) went on to complete their Ph. D.'s after the war, emigrated to two countries, raised four kids, and had, all in all, a pretty successful life.  Did we kids think they "owed" us the fruits of their quite incredibly hard labors?  No way!  They clawed their way out of the gutter and into a middle-class lifestyle through their own blood, sweat and tears, then told us that if they could do it, we could too - and they expected us to do precisely that.  It was up to us to succeed, not up to them to do it for us.

I don't like the way the economy has gone over the past couple of decades, but that's my problem, not something I can expect others to magically resolve.  I don't have a pension from my service as a pastor - I forfeited that when I took a stand over the clergy child sexual abuse issue, as regular readers will understand.  That hasn't made me whine and weep and look to others for support.  It's just thrown me back on my own resources, and I'm using them as best I can to support our family (along with my wife's income, of course).  What right do I have to expect others to pay for me?  None whatsoever, as far as I can see.

Therefore, to read such expectations of his parents, and the implied guilt-trip he's trying to lay on them, infuriates me.  Sure, he's going to have a harder time of it, economically speaking, than his parents did - but their parents probably had it worse than he does, and if he goes back far enough, I'm sure he'll find some ancestors who starved during famines or perished during plagues.

President Theodore Roosevelt had some sage advice that I've made my own since I first read it:


Do what you can,
with what you have,
where you are.


That sums up my life, and the writer's, and everybody else's life too.  We can't rely on anyone else to do those things.  It's up to us.  Anything extra, like winning the lottery, or having generous parents, or whatever, is a bonus - but it's not guaranteed.  We could inherit a million dollars tomorrow, and the day after tomorrow watch as the bottom falls out of the economy and our fiat-currency-millionaire status evaporates like snow on a hot rock.  It boils down to making our own way as best we can under the circumstances confronting us.  If those circumstances are worse than our parents had them - so what?  We still have to cope with them.  They're our problem, nobody else's.

He needs to get his own life, and stop hankering after his parents' lives.

Peter


Wednesday, February 7, 2024

The unspoken problem with inheriting property

 

A recent article suggests that "Millennials are at the bottom of the real estate totem pole, but that could change soon as boomers are expected to pass down trillions of dollars over the next decade".


Millennials own a small fraction of America’s real estate wealth, but that could change in the coming decade as they inherit trillions of dollars in property from their boomer parents.

This so-called “great wealth transfer” is expected to transfer more than $53 trillion in boomer assets to younger generations, according to Cerulli Associates, a Boston-based research firm.

Cerulli Associates estimates that a huge chunk of that transfer will be real estate and millennials will likely be the biggest beneficiaries.

. . .

The wealth gap between boomers and millennials isn’t limited to real estate. According to Fed data, boomers have accumulated a staggering $77.55 trillion in wealth as of the third quarter of 2023.

Perhaps surprisingly, real estate isn’t even their largest holding; it's stocks and mutual funds, constituting $20.18 trillion of boomers' wealth. Baby boomers also amassed $8.72 trillion in pension benefits and $8.05 trillion in business assets.

In comparison, the millennial generation has just over $20 trillion in assets, of which only $0.4 trillion is held in stocks. That could soon change as millennials inherit $53 trillion worth of boomers' nest eggs over the next decade.


There's more at the link.

The numbers sound great, provided that there are buyers for the property, stocks, etc. that will be passed down.  What if there aren't?  It's all very well for our parents to own a house valued at half a million dollars;  but after they die, if the housing market is in the doldrums when we try to sell it, we may be able to realize only half of that valuation, or even less.  That's happened in the past, particularly when other parts of the economy melted down.  For example, consider the stock market crash of 1929 that precipitated the Great Depression.  A study titled "Real Estate Prices During the Roaring Twenties and the Great Depression" says of the Manhattan property market:


During the 1920s prices reached their highest level in the third quarter of 1929 before falling by 67% at the end of 1932 and hovering around that value for most of the Great Depression. The value of high-end properties strongly co-moved with the stock market between 1929 and 1932. A typical property bought in 1920 would have retained only 56% of its initial value in nominal terms two decades later.


Again, more at the link.  Similar trends were observed in other housing markets at the time.

Too many people fail to remember (or perhaps were never taught) that we can't determine the market value of an object in terms of its intrinsic value (follow the links for definitions and explanations).  Basically, an object's market value is what someone else is willing to pay for it.  For example, if my wife has a diamond ring that cost us $10,000, and we need cash in a hurry for other needs (e.g. medical expenses), we might decide to sell it.  We might begin by setting the price at what we paid for it - but what if nobody wants to buy a diamond ring right now?  What if they need their money for other things?  Someone might offer us a mere $2,000 on a "take it or leave it" basis.  We have a choice.  We can hold out for more money - but then we wouldn't have the cash we need right now, or even a part of it.  If we take the cash, we lose 80% of the value of the ring at the price we paid for it - but we have money available for our other needs.  The buyer sets the value, not the seller.

The boot's on the other foot, of course, when it comes to selling something that the buyer simply has to have.  For example, in an emergency, food may not be readily available from a supermarket or neighborhood store.  Someone who has reserve supplies of food may be willing to sell some of his surplus;  but he probably won't do so at the price he paid for it, because its market value has gone up - perhaps way up - thanks to its current scarcity value.  I've seen this in operation during civil upheavals in several African nations.  A sack of cornmeal (maize meal in African terms) that would normally sell for about $5 was selling for between $50 and $75, and there were very few buyers because nobody had enough cash to pay that much.  Those with other valuable goods - e.g. a jerrycan filled with gasoline, or meat from a hunted animal - could barter for the cornmeal, and usually did, because cash and/or physical assets like jewelry or precious metals were worth less than food.

That's why I caution against putting a great deal of one's savings into physical objects like gold and silver.  Sure, invest some money in them:  they have intrinsic value and are a time-honored store of value, and are very likely to retain that value if (when?) fiat currency becomes devalued or even worthless.  However, don't go overboard on them, because in an emergency their intrinsic value may not be realizable in the short term.  You can't pay university fees for your child, or buy groceries, or purchase an airline ticket, with gold or silver coins.  You need cash for that.  It's not a good idea to be asset-rich but cash-poor.  A balance is necessary.  (See the definition of "house poor" for an example.  If one inherits a valuable property, but has to spend a lot on rates, taxes, upkeep and services, that may be the result.)

If wealth is to be inherited, the value of that inheritance will be determined by the market at the time that it's transferred and/or sold.  Example:  my wife and I paid a very reasonable price (for the time) when we bought our home in 2016.  It's valuation has more than doubled since then;  but that doesn't say it's actually worth more than double what we paid.  If one of us dies and the other wants to sell the house, it'll be worth what buyers are willing to pay for it at that time.  That may be double what we paid . . . or it may be half.  We can't predict that, and we won't know until we try to sell it.  If there are no buyers, and no bank will give us a loan secured by the house, it'll be effectively worthless to us in cash terms (although it'll still provide shelter, of course).  The same would apply if, in our will, we left our home to someone else.  He or she would inherit a basically valueless asset in cash terms.

If anyone's expecting to inherit a financial windfall, they should think long and hard about that reality.  The market alone will determine its actual value.

Peter


Wednesday, December 20, 2023

For your friends' toddlers (but not necessarily your own)...

 

... the perfect Christmas present - but only if you don't like his or her parents.



You even get a discount if you buy 2 or more!

I had to smile at some of the reviews.  For example:


This is for my 3 year old great grandson for Christmas. He is non verbal autism. Hopefully he will enjoy these. His parents might not but oh well I guess!!!

(Presumably with tongue in cheek) This little drum set is absolutely adorable. Perfect for the little musician in your life. Not too big, doesn't take up much space. Easy to assemble. Hours of fun!!!


The only potential fly in the ointment is that you can't be sure what the kid's parents will get you and/or your family next Christmas.  They say revenge is a dish best served cold . . .



Peter


Tuesday, November 21, 2023

A timely warning for gift-shopping

 

Those of us with children would do well to heed this warning.


Toys that “spy” on children are a rising, “frightening” threat, a new study from a consumer watchdog has warned.

The U.S. PIRG Education Fund noted that certain toys that record children’s voices, images, locations and other information pose a risk to children’s safety and privacy.

The organization also noted that an increasing number of toys are utilizing technological features — even when they do not appear to be doing so.

“It’s chilling to learn what some of these toys can do,” Teresa Murray, co-author of the “Trouble in Toyland 2023” report, said in a statement.

. . .

... technological toys are becoming an increasing security risk to children, as some have been caught improperly collecting and storing data — and even being hacked.

The growing threat of AI has also infiltrated the toy industry as this advanced, still experimental technology is being integrated into products advertised for children as young as 3 years old.

The agency advises shoppers to research the products on a child’s wish list “before buying a toy with a microphone, a camera, a Wi-Fi or Bluetooth connection or any ability to collect information about young children.”

The report comes after the Federal Trade Commission accused Amazon of violating federal children’s privacy laws through its Alexa service by keeping the voice recordings of children, horror stories of hackers speaking to children through their baby monitors and an 11-year-old girl was kidnapped by a man she met through the online gaming platform Roblox.


There's more at the link.

I'm rather glad I grew up in an era where "smart" toys were unheard of.  In fact, the only "smart" around was the "smarting" we felt after our parents whaled the tar out of us for stepping out of line!  It was a different world then . . . if my parents punished us today as they did then, they'd be in jail for child abuse, even though nothing could have been further from their minds.  They'd both been brought up in the "roaring Twenties" and Great Depression-era Britain, in which period children were very strictly disciplined if need be;  and they brought us up in the same way.  I daresay some of my readers can recall similar habits from their parents.

I'm glad I'm not a child today.  When I look at all the "wokeness" seeking to corrupt them, over and above all the normal perils of childhood, it's a pretty nasty environment.  Parents have their work cut out for them to keep their children's heads above water, so to speak.

Peter


Thursday, September 21, 2023

Pretty much

 

Found on MeWe.  Click the image for a larger view.



That gets it said.

I suggest posting that picture in the teachers' lounge of every kindergarten and elementary school in the country.  Next to it, I'd like to see reward posters offering a bounty on those "teachers" who insist on corrupting our youth in that way.

Works for me . . . how about you?

Peter


Tuesday, August 29, 2023

When the State decides it, not you, "owns" your children

 

Last week I published an article titled "You can no longer entrust your children to the state".  In it, I highlighted how warped and deviant sexual mores and practices were being effectively imposed on families and children by State educational and health care authorities.

The latest development in this nightmare comes from Massachusetts.


In June 2023, the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) unveiled the draft of its new “Comprehensive Health and Physical Education Curriculum Framework” document ... Note that this is officially just “guidelines” for schools. But don’t be fooled. The clear intent down the line is for the legislature to mandate these guidelines.

. . .

The idea of “trauma-sensitive” and “safe and supportive” schools reveals the education establishment’s attitude that schools are equally, if not more, concerned about a child’s safety and emotional support than parents. (And, that the home may not be a safe place.)

The new “equity” emphasis relates to pushing ideas on supposed discrimination (re: race, ethnicity, economic status, and LGBTQ+ identities).

. . .

Throughout the document, sexual orientation and gender identity are treated as valid and legitimate “identifications” which cannot be disputed or challenged in any way. (No alternative moral or scientific perspective is mentioned.) Likewise, systemic discrimination and inequities are presented as fact.

Students will be given resources for support in pursuing LGBT identities, STD testing and treatment, birth control, or abortion, and instructed in how to get help from others if their parents are not in agreement.

Other topics to be addressed in the classroom include rape, sexual consent, sex trafficking, sexual abuse, trauma, domestic violence, dating violence, illicit drugs, community standards, and public and school policy.


There's more at the link, including many examples of such policies and their implications.

In all seriousness, if you take your children's upbringing seriously;  if you want them to adhere to the moral and ethical standards and norms that a traditional (particularly a Christian) upbringing espouses;  if you don't want them exposed to the moral filth that permeates modern society;   then you cannot risk exposing them to the cultural environment being deliberately created and promoted in many State school systems.  The report above refers to Massachusetts specifically, but similar policies are being proposed and implemented in many other states as well.  (To name just one example, see what's happening in Maryland right now.)  The education departments in many states have been infiltrated and overwhelmed by those with ulterior motives and radical progressive agendas, and they're targeting our children.  Even private schools, such as those run by churches, are often forced to follow (or willingly adopt) state curricula including such subjects.  They can no longer be blindly trusted.

It's reached the point where I'm recommending to friends and those who reach out to me for advice that they should not put their children into state-run schools, or those that use a state-approved curriculum, without first checking and double-checking that the curriculum doesn't include this moral trash.  If it does, don't send your kids there!  Home-schooling is fortunately still an option for most Americans, and it's fast becoming the only one where you have a say in what your kids are taught and how they are raised.

I'm aware of a number of families that are banding together to homeschool their children as a group, hiring a trusted teacher (paying partly in cash, partly in kind) to oversee their learning, sharing the burden of supervising them at a central location each day, and planning joint extra-curricular activities.  They see it as defending their kids - and I can't disagree.  I only wish more families were following their example.

Peter


Friday, August 25, 2023

You can no longer entrust your children to the state

 

Two reports caught my eye over the past few days.  First, from Germany:


Several daycare centers in Germany are reportedly considering or have already implemented "sexual exploration rooms" where children can engage in sexual games and discover what they find pleasurable.

When asked for comment by the German newspaper Die Welt, the North Rhine-Westphalia children's ministry, headed by Green Josephine Paul, said the "sexual behavior by children" could not be "prevented" and said they had no intention of contacting the daycare centers.

Die Welt reported that one daycare in Kerpen offers children the "freedom to try out childish sexuality." The daycare also said that sexual self-pleasure on its property is of "great importance," insisting that "masturbation is normal."

. . .

Parents voiced concerns about the "exploration rooms" in June when the news outlet BILD published an email from an Arbeiterwohlfahrt (AWO) daycare center in the Hanover region of Germany ... "My daughter is five years old. I don't want boys groping her. I have another child in another daycare center [where] there is no such thing [as an exploration room]," one father told BILD.


There's more at the link.

Next, from Divemedic:


I got a call from my sister. Her 14 year old daughter, my niece, is being sexually harassed at school. There are a couple of boys who are being very descriptive in what they want to do to her. She told them that what they were doing is sexual harassment, but the boys responded with “You women are just too sensitive.”

Two weeks ago, she emailed the school counselor. Who did nothing. It has continued to happen.

So yesterday, she went to the counselor’s office and complained. The counselor said that there is nothing she can do but move my niece to a different class.

I told my niece that this is unacceptable. She is the victim and shouldn’t have to move, plus this won’t stop the boy from simply seeing her somewhere else and continuing the behavior. I told her that the way forward is to go to the principal (or have her mother do it) and ask that administrator if he is going to take action. Point out to him that he is required by law to take disciplinary action against the boy, and if he doesn’t, she will contact the county school board’s title IX officer and make it an official complaint. Trust me, it won’t go that far.

My niece doesn’t want to do that because she is afraid that, if the boys get in trouble, they are going to bring a gun to school and shoot her.

This is what the left is doing to young women- they have them so afraid of the almost nonexistent threat from school shootings that are black swan events, that these young girls are being sexually harassed and afraid enough that they are having to take it.


Again, more at the link.

These come on top of earlier reports that a Virginia school district is refusing to follow the Governor's (conservative/traditional) guidelines on how transgender issues should be handled, and California is "investigating" school districts that don't follow (extremely liberal/progressive) State guidelines on transgender kids.

Folks, we can no longer trust any educational entity in the country to recognize parental rights over children, and to rein in progressive efforts to brainwash our kids into their warped, twisted way of thought (and life).  Some will object that the report from Germany, above, doesn't apply in the USA:  but it does.  Go read the "fact sheet" from the National Center on the Sexual Behavior of Youth, and see for yourself.  Those guidelines are being used by school districts all over this country.  It's only a matter of time until formal "classrooms" for such behavior are established here, too.

It's not just education, either.  Almost every state department and/or institution is being weaponized to be "politically correct", to be "woke" when it comes to dealing with families, parents and children.  The traditional family is being demonized as the source of problems, rather than the solution to them.

It's becoming more and more clear that we need to keep our kids out of any and all state institutions (including schools) that treat them as commodities to be exploited and brainwashed.  I think home-schooling is probably the only way forward for any family wanting to preserve traditional values.

Peter


Saturday, August 5, 2023

Saturday Snippet: Move over, Hardy Boys, you've got competition

 

Fenton Wood is a pseudonym for an author who's published a five-book series he titles "Yankee Republic".  I started reading it recently, and I'm finding it very interesting and well written.  It's for older children and young adults, and brings to mind earlier pulp fiction classics and adventure series such as the Hardy Boys books.  It reminds me of some of the books I used to read as a child.  (Don't knock books for children, no matter how old you may be.  Some remain very enjoyable.  I still read and re-read some childhood favorites.)

The series blurb reads:


A young radio engineer travels across an alt-history America, encountering primeval gods, mythical beasts, and tall tales come to life, in a quest to build a radio transmitter that can reach the stars.

It all starts in the mountain town of Porterville. Twelve-year-old Philo starts a pirate radio station with his friends, and learns that the world is a stranger place than he ever imagined. The Ancient Marauder, the Bright and Terrible Birds, the Mishipeshu, and other creatures of myth and legend populate this enchanting mixture of science and fantasy.

YANKEE REPUBLIC is an old-school adventure series with traditional values and down-to-earth heroes. Escape from the pessimism and propaganda of modern fiction, and take a journey through a mythic America that might have been.


You can read a brief interview with the author at this link.

There are five books in the "Yankee Republic" series, plus a sixth omnibus volume containing the previous five.  Obviously, that's the most economical way to collect them (although their prices on Amazon are pretty low, anyway).  So far, I'm enjoying them.

I found it hard to pick out a selection to highlight the series, so instead I thought I'd just bring you the first chapter of the first volume, titled "Pirates of the Electromagnetic Waves".  It's short, but sets the scene nicely.


This is the story of Philo Hergenschmidt. By now, the whole world knows what he did, although many people don’t believe it. This is the story of how he did it. It was compiled from original research, contemporary news accounts, and interviews with the man himself. It ranges from the apocryphal, to the questionable, to the impossible. But every word of it is true.

The story begins long ago, when Philo was a boy. He had never seen a television set, or flown in an airplane, or been outside of the valley where he was born. But it was there that he took the first steps of his journey.

1. THE HIGH PLACE

A boy of twelve sat atop the Devil’s Throne.

It was a bare outcropping of volcanic rock, topped by a single gnarled pine tree. The rock formed a vaguely throne-like shape that gave the peak its name. It was the highest point in the hills that ringed the valley. It was supposed to be inaccessible. He had accessed it.

The smell of sun-baked earth and green growing things, the sound of rustling leaves and distant traffic, and the feeling of sweat and grime on his body, proclaimed the advent of summer. From his vantage point, he could see the entire town of Porterville, home to upwards of twenty thousand souls. Every building, every street, every tree, every automobile, every railroad line was laid out before him like a fantastically detailed model train diorama. But he wasn’t there for the view.

“Randall!” he called out.

“Philo! What do you see?” came back a voice from somewhere below him.

“The whole town! Every inch of it!”

“You know I can’t get up there!”

“I’ll send you a postcard!”

“Ha, ha.”

“I’m coming down!”

Philo grabbed the rope that trailed down the side of the peak and descended through the trees, half-climbing and half-sliding. Fifteen minutes later, he rejoined his colleague.

Randall was six months older and half a foot taller, blond-haired and stocky, with a broad, genial face. “How does it look?” he said eagerly.

“It’s perfect. It’s more than perfect. It has a direct line of sight to every part of the valley.”

“So what kind of transmitter do we need?”

“Nothing too big. Thirty watts will be plenty.”

“Thirty watts?” said Randall in dismay. “How are we going to reach the whole town with thirty watts? 7J6 has thirty thousand watts! That’s a thousand times more powerful!”

“No, it’s only eight times more powerful. Wattage adds up logarithmically. And the location of the antenna is a lot more important.”

“Well, if you say so,” Randall said doubtfully.

They had to get down off the mountain while there was light enough. They strapped on their army-surplus packs and canteens, consulted their hand-drawn map, and set off.

“I wish I could have seen it,” Randall said wistfully.

“Once we start building the station, we’ll have rope ladders and pulleys and all kinds of stuff.”

“Say, did you happen to look on the other side?”

“Yep. It’s just like the map says, nothing but mountains and more mountains.”

“Do you think we’ll ever get a signal to the next valley?”

“Well, it’s possible. The boys in that valley would have to find a peak just like this one and put up a repeater, and then we’d have a network.”

Randall smacked his forehead. “Hold on. How’s anybody going to reach this place? Who’s going to climb a mountain just to be on the radio?”

“Well, they don’t have to. We’ll find a spot somewhere below the peak that’s easier to reach. That’s where we build our shack. Then we just have to get our hands on about five hundred feet of coaxial cable.”

They retrieved their bicycles and descended from the mountain, following the bed of a dry creek. It was a strange property of the mountain that you could never come down the same way that you came up. The landmarks were unrecognizable in the other direction, or the branches of the trees bent the wrong way, or you plain got lost. This oddity was well known to the people thereabouts, and the boys found nothing remarkable about it.

Finally, they reached a footpath. They raced down the slope, hitting the bumps at full speed and momentarily taking flight. On the turns, they braked by backpedaling their fixed-gear bicycles and skidding their rear wheels in the dirt. They didn’t slow down until they reached the edge of town.

They turned onto Main Street, a two-lane road that cut a straight path through the town and onward to the Western Gate, a high and narrow notch cut into the rock at the lowest point of the hills. The notch was thirty feet wide, a hundred feet tall, and a hundred fifty feet deep. The setting sun blazed through the gap.

Great piles of rock were poised on either side of the notch, massing thousands of tons, ready to be rolled down to close off the gap in the event of invasion or civil disorder. It would take a construction crew a month to move that much rock, and they’d have to dodge boulders while they were doing it. Meanwhile, the mountain folk would travel the secret paths they had used for centuries before the highway was built. The most hazardous of these was the legendary Eastern Pass, which climbed up so high that on a clear day you could see the far-off glimmer of the ocean.

It was said that the mountains could never be invaded, because the mightiest army would be scattered and lost, diverted into a thousand gullies and crevices. Only the people who were born here, who felt the land in their bones, could navigate it. Even the forces of nature were thwarted. A hundred thousand years ago, when the glaciers came down from the North, the mountains had turned them back. This valley, and others like it, served as refugia, providing shelter to numerous species of plants and animals. While the surrounding lands were a frozen waste, hidden forests grew in the deepest valleys. When the glaciers began to thaw, the forests spread outward and reclaimed the land. Some eighty thousand acres of the original cove forest still stood, being too inaccessible for logging.

The mountain people still remembered the time of the wars, when peace-loving people fled to the places where no one would follow. They were more settled now, but they weren’t domesticated. They knew how to hunt and fish, how to build a shelter from logs and mud, how to grow crops on the steepest mountainside, and how to defend their land.

They even had their own youth organization, the Survival Scouts. The Survival Scout Handbook was a wonder to behold, eight hundred pages long and packed full of information gleaned from the toughest mountain men and a variety of experts. Every summer, boys in uniform could be found up in the hills, building shelters, foraging for edible plants, trapping game, and toughening their bodies. They had to work to earn their merit badges, unlike certain other organizations we could name.

Philo and Randall discussed which merit badges they ought to try for, once the radio station was operational. “It’s too bad they don’t have a merit badge for Piracy,” said Randall.

“There’s one for Guerrilla Warfare,” said Philo. “But you have to earn Rifle Shooting first. I’m just about the worst shot in the whole troop.”

“You’re a wiz at Sabotage,” Randall said helpfully. “You’ve broken more stuff than anyone I know. Radios, windows, collarbones…”

Philo snorted. “Doing it accidentally doesn’t count.”


Things get interesting from there.  Enjoy!

Peter


Tuesday, July 25, 2023

"Why parents of trans kids just can't move on"

 

In an interview with Peter Boghossian, journalist Helen Joyce discussed why parents of trans children just can't let go of the subject, and why they keep harping on about it.  The transcript below is courtesy of John Kass.


“Something you may not have thought of is that there are a lot of people who can’t move on from this. And that’s the people who have transitioned their own children. So those people are going to be like the Japanese soldiers who were on Pacific islands and didn’t know the war was over. They’ve got to fight forever. This is another reason why this is the worst, worst, worst social contagion that we’ll ever have experienced.

“A lot of people have done what is the worst thing you could do, which is to harm their children irrevocably, because of it. Those people will have to believe that they did the right thing for the rest of their lives, for their own sanity, and for their own self-respect. So they’ll still be fighting, and each one of those people destroys entire organizations and entire friendship groups.

“Like, I’ve lost count of the number of times that somebody has said to me of a specific organization that has been turned upside down on this, “Oh, the deputy director has a trans child.” Or, oh, the journalist on that paper who does special investigations has a trans child. Or whatever. The entire organization gets paralyzed by that one person. And it may not even be widely known at that organization that they have a trans child. But it will come out, people will have sort of said quietly, and now you can’t talk truth in front of that person, and you know you can’t, because what you’re saying is: “You as a parent have done a truly, like, a human rights abuse level of awful thing to your own child that can not be fixed.

“There are specific individuals who are actively against women’s rights here and it is not known why they are, but I happen to know through the back channels that it is because they’ve transed their child.

“So those people will do anything for the entire rest of their lives to destroy me and people like me because people like me are standing in reproach to them. I don’t want to be, I’m not talking directly to them, and I don’t spend my time bitching to them.

“But the fact is that just simply by saying we will never accept natural males in women’s spaces, well it is their son that we’re talking about. And they’ve told their son that he can get himself sterilized and destroy his own basic sexual function and women will accept him as a woman. And if we don’t, there’s no way back for them and that child.

“They’ve sold their child a bill of goods that they can’t deliver on.

“And I’m the one that has to be bullied to try to force me to deliver on it.

“So those people are going to be the people who will keep this bloody movement going, I’m sorry to say, because they’ve everything to lose, and it is a fight to the death as far as they are concerned.”


There's more at John Kass' article.

Tragically, that makes an awful lot of sense to me . . .



Peter


Thursday, June 22, 2023

A physician examines the "transgender nightmare"

 

An interview from City Journal:


Christopher Rufo: Please begin by setting the scene. What’s it like in a major children’s hospital in the United States regarding transgender interventions for children?

Physician: I think the best way to answer that question is to talk about the cultural shift that happened in 2020, because transgender ideology and Covid are inextricably linked. Normally, doctors operate by the authority of the professional societies that govern our specific practice. That worked because the individuals in those institutions were reliable, intelligent, and thoughtful. But with Covid in 2020, we started getting medical decrees without peer review or evidence—you saw this with masks, social distancing, and emergency-use authorizations. These decrees were expressed as something that everyone had to do, without justification based on sound science. The other thing was censorship. If you were to ask questions or express doubt about these medical decrees, you would be ostracized within your department, and you stood a good chance of being publicly humiliated, severely reprimanded, or fired.

That’s when transgender ideology really took off. Within these academic institutions, so-called experts in the field of transgender medicine would simply declare that puberty blockers and other interventions were the gold standard of care. The evidence to support this is completely fraudulent, but no dissent was permitted. Everyone within the medical community knew that if he questioned transgender ideology, he would suffer the same type of repercussions that had happened during Covid. The best way to describe the environment would be as an authoritarian, censorious culture that discourages any meaningful debate and encourages the demonization of anyone who asks questions.

Rufo: What are the main tenets of transgender medical theory that are enforced as the conventional wisdom? And how have those tenets changed medical practice?

Physician: One, when an individual believes he or she is of a certain sex, he or she is truly of that sex. Two, the ideal response is to affirm that individual’s preferred identity. Three, the repercussion of nonintervention is a higher likelihood of that individual committing suicide. The threat of suicide removes any of the guardrails for what we must do to affirm that individual’s identity. Puberty blockers become justified at 11 years old. Hormones become justified at 13 years old. Double mastectomy becomes justified before 18.

But in reality, when you “affirm” these individuals’ gender identity, what you are doing is affirming their hatred for themselves. You have these children who are going through confusing times, difficult times; when you affirm this belief system, what you’re really doing is telling them: “You hate yourself at this moment, and I will affirm that.” We have to ask ourselves, why do these people have such high rates of suicide? Because we’re affirming that they should hate themselves and that they should try to destroy themselves.


There's much more at the link.

It's nightmare material.  If you're a parent with young children (particularly those in their early teens), you need to be aware of the pressure that the transgender lobby is exerting on your kids, and be ready, willing and able to counter it if (when?) necessary.  Go read the whole article.  It's worth your time.



Peter


Monday, June 5, 2023

They taught their kids properly back then

 

A friend sent me a link to an article titled "Return of the One Room Schoolhouse".  I found it very interesting, particularly because it gave examples of eighth grade final examinations from 1895.  I doubt most of our modern schoolchildren could pass them - in fact, I think most of us adults would have a hard time with them too!

Here, for example, is the Geography exam.


Geography (Time, one hour)

1. What is climate? Upon what does climate depend?

2. How do you account for the extremes of climate in Kansas?

3. Of what use are rivers? Of what use is the ocean?

4. Describe the mountains of N.A.

5. Name and describe the following: Monrovia, Odessa, Denver, Manitoba, Hecla, Yukon, St. Helena, Juan Fernandez, Aspinwall and Orinoco.

6. Name and locate the principal trade centers of the U.S.

7. Name all the republics of Europe and give capital of each.

8. Why is the Atlantic Coast colder than the Pacific in the same latitude?

9. Describe the process by which the water of the ocean returns to the sources of rivers.

10. Describe the movements of the earth. Give inclination of the earth.


All that in one hour?  I'd be very hard pressed to answer that many questions, concisely enough, in that time limit.

Click over to the article to look at the examinations for English, arithmetic and other subjects.  They're interesting and thought-provoking.  Why are modern children taught so much less factually, and so much more about irrelevant, touchy-feely subjects that will do nothing to help them as adults?

Peter


Thursday, June 1, 2023

Spongebob - perhaps not so innocent as he seems?

 

I was surprised to read Vox Day's comments about rumors that the Spongebob Squarepants children's TV character may have pedophile influences in his background.  It looks like the address on Spongebob's driver's license is located on Little Saint James Island in the American Virgin Islands - the island formerly owned by the infamous sexual predator, Jeffrey Epstein.

I highly recommend clicking over to Vox's blog post and reading it for yourself, then verifying it via Google Maps.  It checks out - at least, it did for me, five minutes ago.

Vox advises:


At this point, all children’s shows need to be considered intrinsically suspect. Just as all media “fact-checks” need to be considered inherently false.


True dat.



Peter


Wednesday, May 24, 2023

True dat

 

Gab user Rich Shappard posts this image:



Based on many years' experience as a pastor and chaplain, allow me to assure you, that's very, very true.

I'd guesstimate that of the sexual predators and child molesters I encountered in prison, well over half - perhaps as many as four-fifths - had been molested or abused as children themselves.  It permanently warped and twisted them, so they were never able to break free of those early bonds of evil that had been laid upon them.  It's all very well to say that free will is involved, that they could always have refused to follow such inclinations by strength of will . . . but sadly, it's not that easy.  Such psychological damage can and does cripple many people, making it impossible for them to turn away from what has been done to them.  Many people don't realize this.

That's why I've said all along that there is no cure for pedophilia, and no cure for similar sexual predators.  It's simply not possible.  There are only three possibilities in my experience:

  1. For those with the strength of will to do so, they have to stay away from vulnerable people so that they don't put themselves in temptation's path.  This is, of course, not always possible, so there are times that only their own strength of will will help.  If they have it, great.  If they don't . . . not so much.
  2. Those who can marry happily, and find a partner that will accept them and their psychological burdens and work with them to help them adjust, may find the peace of mind needed to overcome their past.  That doesn't often happen, and it takes a very special kind of partner.  Sadly, it's been my experience that "damaged" people (i.e. the victims of pedophilia, etc.) often find each other and form partnerships where their mutual damage translates into mutual predation upon others.
  3. Those who don't fall into either group above are often beyond worldly help.  Even psychologists and psychiatrists, although they can explain their conduct to them and help them to understand it, can't provide the inner motivation to make them want to change.  We pastors and chaplains face a similar problem;  we can talk about Divine grace until we're blue in the face, but unless the person is willing to make a serious, life-changing commitment to seek and use that grace, our words won't get them anywhere.  For such people, all too often, the only "treatment" possible is incarceration, to keep them away from their potential victims;  and even that isn't a perfect solution, because sooner or later they're going to be released from prison, and many of them won't be able to stop themselves reverting to pattern.
It's a tragic situation for their victims, and in some ways equally tragic for the perpetrators.

It's facile to say "just shoot them".  There are, and will be, too many others to take their place.  We can't kill our way out of this problem.  It takes parents who are actively involved in raising their children, who establish bonds of trust with them and encourage them to tell them about any encounters with this sort of thing, who can help them avoid the worst of the problem.  Today, we do our kids a disservice if we don't educate them about the risks involved, and what to do about them.

We can also make sure that they aren't exposed to "grooming" behavior (including "drag queen story hours" at libraries, "woke" schools and education authorities that actively encourage deviant behavior, and other such threats).  Yes, that means we have to get involved.  Yes, that means we may have to abandon more attractive and interesting uses of our time in order to protect our kids by our involvement.  That's what parenting - proper parenting - is all about.

Peter


Wednesday, May 10, 2023

This is sick and evil beyond belief - but it's happening right now, all over the place

 

There's an article by Tayler Hansen titled "The 'All Ages' Drag Show Epidemic Plaguing America".  It documents - complete with video recordings - what's actually going on in these so-called "Drag Queen Story Hours" being presented at local libraries, churches and other venues.

I was horrified to read it, not because I was unaware of how bad things were getting, but at how widespread the infection has become in our society.  An example:


Within 5 minutes of sitting down with my bingo card and pamphlet detailing the [First Christian Church's] “values” I was approached by who I labeled “church worker #2”. (A total creep) He sat next to me and immediately asked my name and how I identify. He began talking about how much pride the church places in what they call the “trans” or “transparency” closet. At this point I knew something even weirder than Drag Queen Bingo was taking place and I leaned into the conversation. He offered to give me a tour after I showed interest and had already made multiple sexual remarks about my appearance. He seemed very fidgety and sporadic as if he were on an amphetamine of some kind.

He began to lead me to the back where a confined room was located, where he would take multiple children throughout the event without adult supervision. Once I entered the room, worker #1 explained that this closet was for children to come and select “gender affirming” clothing. They were offering chest binders, underwear, bras, jewelry, and other clothing. He explained how they even have whole foods bags so children can bring their “gender affirming” clothes and binders home without raising suspicion of their parents. Definitely not a “transparent” closet as they said it was. Throughout this entire process, church worker #2 was struggling to open a package of donuts while acting like an addict.


This is - at least nominally - a church.  A Christian church.  Anything less in conformity with the Gospel of Christ is almost impossible to imagine . . . but they're doing it.  I somehow doubt they bother to read the salient portions of those Gospels in that church, particularly Luke 17:1-2.  Perhaps someone should leave a pile of millstones outside their front door as a reminder.

(Nor is that church alone.  Witness the current brouhaha over a Catholic church in New York that proclaimed - on the altar - "God is Trans".  I understand the display was not approved by the local Bishop, but the very fact that the parish pastor could permit and/or tolerate such an exhibit is - literally - heretical.  In the light of the ongoing fallout from the Catholic Church's problems with child sexual abuse by some of its pastors, it's even worse.)

Also noteworthy is that many parents of the kids who are dragged along to such events are themselves mentally deranged.  I've seen this as a pastor many times.  A parent persuades him/herself that their child is oriented in this, or that, or the other way, because it makes them - the parent - look good to their social circle.  Therefore, they effectively force their child into that way of behavior, despite the damage they're undoubtedly doing to them.  Another example from the article:


I remember sitting there at the bar alongside Aldo Buttazoni in complete disbelief in what we were witnessing. In the moment I couldn’t fathom that this gay bar with sexual signs and scantily dressed men posing as women were about dance for little children with easily malleable minds. The environment was that of a strip club or a burlesque show. Looking around I was in complete disbelief watching parents, who are supposed to protect their children from perversion, were hooting and hollering in anticipation for men to dance sexually for their children.

As the show started, a young child was sitting next to me at the bar top, he looked miserable and out of place. He was playing with a rubiks cube and Nintendo throughout the entire performance. The bartender began talking to him as he was serving alcoholic beverages over the child’s head. That’s when I overheard a conversation that was truly horrifying and depicted the days events perfectly.

Bartender: Are you gay?

Child: No, I’m not gay.

Mother: *Interrupting* No he is gay, don’t let him lie to you, he is.

The Child, visibly uncomfortable by the bartenders comment and his mothers correction, bowed his head towards the ground like a puppy that was just scolded. The child didn’t say another word for the remainder of the show, and instead resumed playing on his Nintendo with his head hidden away.


Again, millstones come to mind.

I'm not going to embed more here, but I am going to recommend as strongly as I know how that you click over to the article and read it in full for yourself.  When you've done so, pass it on to your family and friends, and keep the link handy for future use.

Our kids are being targeted by the forces of evil.  There's no other way to put it.  The way one deals with evil is to drag it out into the light, so that it can be clearly seen and understood for what it is;  and, when that's been done, one deals with the evildoers as firmly and as permanently as possible, so that they no longer have any opportunity for future evil.

This article is a good start to that process.

Peter


Thursday, April 20, 2023

Doofus Of The Day #1,105

 

Today's award goes to the organisers of the North Canterbury Hunting Competition in New Zealand.  The BBC reports:


A children's cat-hunting competition in New Zealand has been cancelled following backlash against the event.

Organisers of an annual hunt were criticised after announcing a new category for those aged 14 and under to hunt feral cats.

The animals are considered a pest and a risk to the country's biosecurity.

Youngsters were told to not kill pets, but they were otherwise encouraged to kill as many feral cats as possible for a prize.

The child who killed the most between mid-April and the end of June would have won NZ$250 (£124; $155).

. . .

The event had been announced as part of a June fundraiser hunt for a local school in North Canterbury in the South Island, a largely rural area of New Zealand where hunting is popular.

The competition each year typically sees hundreds - including children - compete to kill wild pigs, deer and hares.


There's more at the link.

I know that feral cats pose a grave risk to small indigenous animals and birds, and that their population needs to be controlled, if not eradicated (the latter almost impossible in practical terms).  However, to ask children to kill cats is dubious on several grounds.

  • What about kids who have cats at home?  They're used to thinking of cats as pets, even friends.  Now they're told to kill them.  Conflict, much?
  • What about the kids who will gleefully kill any and every cat they come across, including other people's pets, in an attempt to run up their score and win the competition?  You know as well as I do that such kids exist.  I've met too many of them, both as a child and as an adult.  Some of them will even take pleasure in torturing cats and other animals.  Yes, they're out there.
  • The organizers must have been as thick as two short planks in failing to take into consideration the number of cat-lovers who'd object to their contest.  Did they have no public relations advisers at all among their number?
I'm not anti-hunting at all, and despite having two cats of my own, I'll even support the hunting of feral cats by adults as a pest eradication effort.  However, this children's cat hunt was not a good idea . . .

Peter


Wednesday, April 19, 2023

Your warm-and-fuzzy story of the week

 

Here's a wonderful example of a generous, loving family.  The report is from 2019, but that doesn't diminish its impact.


A set of seven brothers and sisters were just adopted together after being separated for over a year in foster care.

Emerson, 12, Autumn, 11, Jaxon, 9, Journey, 8, Jace, 7, Piper, 5, and Sawyer, 3, found their forever home on Wednesday thanks to their new adoptive parents , Lisa and Gary Fulbright.

"Everyone was ecstatic, it was a full courtroom," Lisa Fulbright of Derby, Kansas, told "Good Morning America," about the adoption day. "Autumn, she woke up this morning, stretched and her first words were, 'I'm adopted!'"

Lisa and Gary Fulbright already had a combined seven children from their previous marriages. The couple also share a biological son together, Logan, 17.

Siblings Piper, 5 and Sawyer, 3, got their forever home on Wednesday thanks to their new parents, Lisa and Gary Fulbright of Derby, Kan.

Since all of their children except Logan had moved out, the Fulbrights decided to become foster parents. Three years ago, they adopted a pair of siblings -- Hannah, 10, and Levi, 8.

Then, in Feb. 2017, three brothers, Jaxon, Journey and Jace, came into their care. The Fulbrights would often invite their other siblings over for holidays so that Emerson, Autumn, Jaxon, Journey, Jace, Piper and Sawyer could all be together.

June of that same year, Emerson and Autumn joined their brothers at the Fulbright's home. Piper and Sawyer followed in February 2018.

Emerson, 12, Autumn, 11, Jaxon, 9, Journey, 8, Jace, 7, Piper, 5 and Sawyer 3, had been in foster care in the state of Kansas for 734 days.

Lisa Fulbright said she and her husband fell in love with all seven kids, who came from a neglectful family and were into care by the state of Kansas. Saint Francis Ministries, an organization that provides foster care and adoption services to children in state custody, asked the Fulbrights if they would consider adopting all of the siblings.

. . .

The Fulbrights immediately agreed to adopt the children, and on April 10, they made it official at the Juvenile District Court in Wichita. The family even worse custom jerseys to honor their favorite football team, the Kansas City Chiefs.

. . .

Lisa Fulbright said all seven of her children are kind-hearted and a whole lot of fun.

"It's kind of chaos but it's a fun type of chaos because we just love them," she added.


There's more at the link, including photographs.

In this day and age, when so much pressure is being exerted on and against traditional families, it's heartwarming to see a couple care so much about keeping siblings together that they expanded their family to include them.  There are few who'd have been willing to take on that responsibility - or so many extra kids!  Kudos to them, and to the agencies that made the arrangements.

We need more families like this.

Peter


Wednesday, January 18, 2023

There's no hell hot enough for this filth in human form

 

I'm not going to post a lengthy excerpt from this article, because it's just too sickening for words.  I'll let the headline speak for it, and leave you to click over there if you want to read it.



I've been exposed to some of the most ghastly crimes - including offenses against children - during my work as a prison chaplain.  However, I've never come across something as bad as this before.  To homosexually assault your own adopted children, make pornographic movies of it, and pimp them out to other pedophiles . . . it's beyond comprehension.

All I can say is, I hope the investigation yields the names of many more offenders, and that all of them are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.  If those responsible are convicted, I also hope their fellow inmates behind bars learn of their crimes.  They'll most likely provide a far more appropriate punishment than anything the law might allow.  (Personally, I think it might be time to bring back public burning at the stake.  I'll gladly contribute firewood and/or charcoal.)




Peter


Tuesday, December 20, 2022

"For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind"

 

That headline comes from the Bible:  Hosea 8:7.  I can't think of a more appropriate application for it than those behind the so-called "Drag Queen Christmas" show for children.  I can only assess it in Biblical and Christian terms, because if I didn't - if I didn't have that moral restraint to control my actions - I'd be vitriolic, and less than measured in my response.

I'm not going to publish details or pictures here, because they're sickening.  You'll find a very informative Twitter thread, complete with pictures, here:  for a more convenient read, including the pictures, see the Threadreader combined thread hereWARNING:  Neither link is safe for work, or for family viewing, and they will offend viewers with any sense of traditional morality at all.  View at your own risk.

(I found it noteworthy that the "host" of the show is affiliated with Disney+ and Nickelodeon.  So much for those corporations and their "family values" . . .)

I presume that the readers of this blog have too much sense, and are sufficiently ethical and honorable in their behavior, to ever expose their kids to this sort of moral meltdown.  However, tragically, the same can't be said for many others in our demented society.  An ancient idiom warns us that "Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad".  If our society not only permits, not only tolerates, but actually encourages this filth, then I can only suspect we have an awful lot of gods trying to make us as insane as possible.  From where else could such madness come?

If I knew that anyone associated in any way with this endeavor were living anywhere near my home, I'd mobilize as many people as possible in my neighborhood to drive them out.  I could not tolerate such evil in close proximity to those I hold dear.  How can anyone in his or her right mind tolerate such public displays - and displayers - of evil anywhere near them?

I can only urge you, dear readers, to find out whether this abomination is coming to any venue near you.  If it is, boycott the performance, raise outrage against the venue allowing it to be performed, contact local churches and urge them to mobilize their members against it - in other words, do anything and everything possible to disrupt it.  Filth like this stains everything and everyone it touches, morally for certain, and possibly physically as well (in terms of crime rates and other real-world consequences).  You certainly don't want it corrupting local children!

As for those promoting it, and performing in it, and defending it?


Matthew 18:5-6 - "Whoever receives one such child in my name receives me;  but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened round his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea."

Luke 17:1-2 - And he said to his disciples, "Temptations to sin are sure to come; but woe to him by whom they come!  It would be better for him if a millstone were hung round his neck and he were cast into the sea, than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin."


I don't think Jesus was joking.


Hebrews 10:31 - "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God."


I'm pretty sure those concerned will learn that the hard way, sooner or later.

Peter


Friday, December 9, 2022

The sobering reality of child trafficking

 

Larry Lambert writes:


DRSZ teaches in the humanities and one of his interests has been alien smuggling. On the order of 12 years ago, DRSZ reached out to me and asked me if I had something that he could write a paper on. Something that he could publish and present to other academics at conferences. I asked if it had to deal with snakeheads and Asians and he said that it didn’t.

I explained how the system worked in Tijuana at the time. Mexican traffickers traveled throughout Central America and Mexico buying children from families who had many children and could not afford to feed or house them. The going rate was US$20-35 in local currency. The traffickers posed as priests and nuns and promised to take the youngsters (pre-teen) to a better place. SZ was intrigued. Could he meet the smugglers and the slaves? Of course. He could even buy a child at the going rate then which was US$75-150 in Tijuana.

I knew/still know the MEXGOV official who oversees this so we went to TJ and met G. G is his name and also stands for Gordo. G took DRSZ to the building where the children were housed. Once purchased they had a no-return policy. Snuff the child or do whatever but they didn’t want them back when you were done with them. SZ met the alien smugglers and the slaves. The smugglers had people among them dressed in police uniforms to convince the children that going to the police for help was a bad idea.


There's more at the link.  Go read the whole thing.

Larry's not exaggerating at all.  I saw the beginning of one of the child smuggling pipelines in Africa, where "excess" children are sold by their parents, or stolen from refugee camps where their parents can't always keep track of them.  If they're pretty, they'll end up as sex slaves;  if they're not, they'll end up as regular slaves, worked to death to extract minerals or labor in dangerous factories.  There are regular markets in the Middle East and north Africa where those in the know can gather to examine the "merchandise" and bid on it.  From there, the children are smuggled into First World nations where they're sold or rented out to the highest bidder.

Many of the illegal aliens coming across our southern border are accompanied by children, because they get better treatment that way from the authorities here.  Relatively few of those children are related to those with whom they're found.  Furthermore, when "relatives" in the USA claim them, there's seldom any DNA testing done to ensure that they are, indeed related.  Commonly, they're not.  The children are simply being moved along the pipeline to where their "owners" can make the most money out of them.  Nobody in authority seems to care about that, or have the time to verify that the children are OK.

Most terrifying of all is that many of these children will be used for sexual abuse.  Nobody knows them;  nobody wants them - so when the abusers have done with them, they can be "disappeared" without anybody in authority knowing they even existed.  The bodies can be hidden in many ways and places, or even used to make more money.  (I read of one investigation into the ingredients of a popular brand of dog food in another country.  You don't want to know what they discovered.  It never made the headlines.)

I regard child kidnappers or sellers in the same light as child abusers.  Prison is far, far too good for them.




Peter